 |
PDBsum entry 2blo
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.3.4.21.36
- pancreatic elastase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
Hydrolysis of proteins, including elastin. Preferential cleavage: Ala-|-Xaa.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr
61:1227-1237
(2005)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Improving radiation-damage substructures for RIP.
|
|
M.H.Nanao,
G.M.Sheldrick,
R.B.Ravelli.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Specific radiation damage can be used to solve macromolecular structures using
the radiation-damage-induced phasing (RIP) method. The method has been
investigated for six disulfide-containing test structures (elastase, insulin,
lysozyme, ribonuclease A, trypsin and thaumatin) using data sets that were
collected on a third-generation synchrotron undulator beamline with a highly
attenuated beam. Each crystal was exposed to the unattenuated X-ray beam between
the collection of a 'before' and an 'after' data set. The X-ray 'burn'-induced
intensity differences ranged from 5 to 15%, depending on the protein
investigated. X-ray-susceptible substructures were determined using the
integrated direct and Patterson methods in SHELXD. The best substructures were
found by downscaling the 'after' data set in SHELXC by a scale factor K, with
optimal values ranging from 0.96 to 0.99. The initial substructures were
improved through iteration with SHELXE by the addition of negatively occupied
sites as well as a large number of relatively weak sites. The final
substructures ranged from 40 to more than 300 sites, with strongest peaks as
high as 57sigma. All structures except one could be solved: it was not possible
to find the initial substructure for ribonuclease A, however, SHELXE iteration
starting with the known five most susceptible sites gave excellent maps.
Downscaling proved to be necessary for the solution of elastase, lysozyme and
thaumatin and reduced the number of SHELXE iterations in the other cases. The
combination of downscaling and substructure iteration provides important
benefits for the phasing of macromolecular structures using radiation damage.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4
The effect of scale factor on the structure solution of (a) insulin, (b) lysozyme, (c)
thaumatin and (d) trypsin. CC[best] is represented by open squares, wMPE is represented by
crosses and pseudo-free CC is represented as closed squares.
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6
Experimental electron-density maps (a) and weighted mean phase errors (b) for lysozyme for
different subsequent iterations in SHELXE. A total of 13 substructure iterations were
made; maps were drawn after iteration Nos. 1, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 11.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the IUCr:
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr
(2005,
61,
1227-1237)
copyright 2005.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
D.de Sanctis,
P.A.Tucker,
and
S.Panjikar
(2011).
Additional phase information from UV damage of selenomethionine labelled proteins.
|
| |
J Synchrotron Radiat,
18,
374-380.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Sanishvili,
D.W.Yoder,
S.B.Pothineni,
G.Rosenbaum,
S.Xu,
S.Vogt,
S.Stepanov,
O.A.Makarov,
S.Corcoran,
R.Benn,
V.Nagarajan,
J.L.Smith,
and
R.F.Fischetti
(2011).
Radiation damage in protein crystals is reduced with a micron-sized X-ray beam.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
108,
6127-6132.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.F.Garman
(2010).
Radiation damage in macromolecular crystallography: what is it and why should we care?
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
66,
339-351.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.M.Sheldrick
(2010).
Experimental phasing with SHELXC/D/E: combining chain tracing with density modification.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
66,
479-485.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.P.Bourenkov,
and
A.N.Popov
(2010).
Optimization of data collection taking radiation damage into account.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
66,
409-419.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Diederichs
(2010).
Quantifying instrument errors in macromolecular X-ray data sets.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
66,
733-740.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.B.Moore
(2009).
On the relationship between diffraction patterns and motions in macromolecular crystals.
|
| |
Structure,
17,
1307-1315.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.M.Sheldrick
(2008).
A short history of SHELX.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr A,
64,
112-122.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.De la Mora-Rey,
and
C.M.Wilmot
(2007).
Synergy within structural biology of single crystal optical spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
17,
580-586.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
|
');
}
}
 |