 |
PDBsum entry 1w2r
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immune system
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1w2r
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
* C-alpha coords only
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Immune system
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Solution structure of cr2 scr 1-2 by x-ray scattering
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Complement receptor type 2 precursor,. Chain: a. Synonym: cr2 scr 1-2, complement c3d receptor, epstein-barr virus receptor, ebv receptor, cd21 antigen. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Expressed in: pichia pastoris. Expression_system_taxid: 4922
|
|
Ensemble:
|
 |
6 models
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
H.E.Gilbert,J.P.Hannan,V.M.Holers,S.J.Perkins
|
Key ref:
|
 |
H.E.Gilbert
et al.
(2005).
Solution structure of the complex between CR2 SCR 1-2 and C3d of human complement: an X-ray scattering and sedimentation modelling study.
J Mol Biol,
346,
859-873.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
08-Jul-04
|
Release date:
|
29-Sep-05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P20023
(CR2_HUMAN) -
Complement receptor type 2 from Homo sapiens
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
1033 a.a.
142 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
|
*
PDB and UniProt seqs differ
at 10 residue positions (black
crosses)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
346:859-873
(2005)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Solution structure of the complex between CR2 SCR 1-2 and C3d of human complement: an X-ray scattering and sedimentation modelling study.
|
|
H.E.Gilbert,
J.T.Eaton,
J.P.Hannan,
V.M.Holers,
S.J.Perkins.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Complement receptor type 2 (CR2, CD21) forms a tight complex with C3d, a
fragment of C3, the major complement component. Previous crystal structures of
the C3d-CR2 SCR 1-2 complex and free CR2 SCR 1-2 showed that the two SCR domains
of CR2 form contact with each other in a closed V-shaped structure. SCR 1 and
SCR 2 are connected by an unusually long eight-residue linker peptide.
Medium-resolution solution structures for CR2 SCR 1-2, C3d, and their complex
were determined by X-ray scattering and analytical ultracentrifugation. CR2 SCR
1-2 is monomeric. For CR2 SCR 1-2, its radius of gyration R(G) of 2.12(+/-0.05)
nm, its maximum length of 10nm and its sedimentation coefficient s20,w(o) of
1.40(+/-0.03) S do not agree with those calculated from the crystal structures,
and instead suggest an open structure. Computer modelling of the CR2 SCR1-2
solution structure was based on the structural randomisation of the
eight-residue linker peptide joining SCR 1 and SCR 2 to give 9950 trial models.
Comparisons with the X-ray scattering curve indicated that the most favoured
arrangements for the two SCR domains corresponded to an open V-shaped structure
with no contacts between the SCR domains. For C3d, X-ray scattering and
sedimentation velocity experiments showed that it exists as a monomer-dimer
equilibrium with a dissociation constant of 40 microM. The X-ray scattering
curve for monomeric C3d gave an R(G) value of 1.95 nm, and this together with
its s20,w(o) value of 3.17 S gave good agreement with the monomeric C3d crystal
structure. Modelling of the C3d dimer gave good agreements with its scattering
and ultracentrifugation parameters. For the complex, scattering and
ultracentrifugation experiments showed that there was no dimerisation,
indicating that the C3d dimerisation site was located close to the CR2 SCR 1-2
binding site. The R(G) value of 2.44(+/-0.1) nm, its length of 9 nm and its
s20,w(o) value of 3.45(+/-0.01) S showed that its structure was not much more
elongated than that of C3d. Calculations with 9950 models of CR2 SCR 1-2 bound
to C3d through SCR 2 showed that SCR 1 formed an open V-shaped structure with
SCR 2 and was capable of interacting with the surface of C3d. We conclude that
the open V-shaped structures formed by CR2 SCR 1-2, both when free and when
bound to C3d, are optimal for the formation of a tight two-domain interaction
with its ligand C3d.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Schematic diagrams of the CR2 SCR 1-2/C3d complex
to show three alternative models for the complex comprising
either (a) a compact V-shaped SCR structure, (b) an extended SCR
structure, or (c) a folded-back SCR structure. The domains are
drawn approximately to scale. The two SCR domains are joined by
an eight residue linker (8) with their N terminus and C terminus
denoted by N and C, respectively. Two potential N-linked
glycosylation sites at Asn101 and Asn107 are shown by Y symbols.
In this study, CR2 SCR 1-2 is deglycosylated, and only single
GlcNAc residues are found at these two sites.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. X-ray distance distribution functions P(r) for
CR2 SCR 1-2, C3d, and their complex. The maximum M of each P(r)
curve shows the most frequently occurring distance within each
molecule. The maximum dimension is denoted by L. (a) For CR2 SCR
1-2, M occurs at 2.1 nm and L at 10 nm. (b) For C3d, five
different sample concentrations are shown at 0.5 mg ml -1 (red),
0.8 mg ml -1 (orange), 1.1 mg ml -1 (green), 2.1 mg ml -1
(blue), and 3.73 mg ml -1 (pink) from bottom to top. The three
broken lines represent P(r) curves whose intensities have been
increased by factors of 8.5 (0.5 mg ml -1), 7.0 (0.8 mg ml -1),
and 5.5 (1.1 mg ml -1) for clarity. Peak M[1] corresponds to
monomeric C3d and peak M[2] corresponds to its dimer. (c) For
the complex, M occurs at 3.0 nm and L at 9 nm.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2005,
346,
859-873)
copyright 2005.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
C.A.Kieslich,
D.Morikis,
J.Yang,
and
D.Gunopulos
(2011).
Automated computational framework for the analysis of electrostatic similarities of proteins.
|
| |
Biotechnol Prog,
27,
316-325.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.I.Okemefuna,
L.Stach,
S.Rana,
A.J.Buetas,
J.Gor,
and
S.J.Perkins
(2010).
C-reactive protein exists in an NaCl concentration-dependent pentamer-decamer equilibrium in physiological buffer.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
285,
1041-1052.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.I.Okemefuna,
R.Nan,
A.Miller,
J.Gor,
and
S.J.Perkins
(2010).
Complement factor H binds at two independent sites to C-reactive protein in acute phase concentrations.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
285,
1053-1065.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Li,
J.Gor,
and
S.J.Perkins
(2010).
Self-association and domain rearrangements between complement C3 and C3u provide insight into the activation mechanism of C3.
|
| |
Biochem J,
431,
63-72.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Abe,
J.Gor,
D.G.Bracewell,
S.J.Perkins,
and
P.A.Dalby
(2010).
Masking of the Fc region in human IgG4 by constrained X-ray scattering modelling: implications for antibody function and therapy.
|
| |
Biochem J,
432,
101-111.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.M.Kovacs,
J.P.Hannan,
E.Z.Eisenmesser,
and
V.M.Holers
(2009).
Mapping of the C3d ligand binding site on complement receptor 2 (CR2/CD21) using nuclear magnetic resonance and chemical shift analysis.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
9513-9520.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.J.Perkins,
A.I.Okemefuna,
R.Nan,
K.Li,
and
A.Bonner
(2009).
Constrained solution scattering modelling of human antibodies and complement proteins reveals novel biological insights.
|
| |
J R Soc Interface,
6,
S679-S696.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Krishnan,
Y.Xu,
K.Macon,
J.E.Volanakis,
and
S.V.Narayana
(2009).
The structure of C2b, a fragment of complement component C2 produced during C3 convertase formation.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
65,
266-274.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Ricklin,
S.K.Ricklin-Lichtsteiner,
M.M.Markiewski,
B.V.Geisbrecht,
and
J.D.Lambris
(2008).
Cutting edge: members of the Staphylococcus aureus extracellular fibrinogen-binding protein family inhibit the interaction of C3d with complement receptor 2.
|
| |
J Immunol,
181,
7463-7467.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.A.Young,
A.P.Herbert,
P.N.Barlow,
V.M.Holers,
and
J.P.Hannan
(2008).
Molecular basis of the interaction between complement receptor type 2 (CR2/CD21) and Epstein-Barr virus glycoprotein gp350.
|
| |
J Virol,
82,
11217-11227.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Haspel,
D.Ricklin,
B.V.Geisbrecht,
L.E.Kavraki,
and
J.D.Lambris
(2008).
Electrostatic contributions drive the interaction between Staphylococcus aureus protein Efb-C and its complement target C3d.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
17,
1894-1906.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Gros,
F.J.Milder,
and
B.J.Janssen
(2008).
Complement driven by conformational changes.
|
| |
Nat Rev Immunol,
8,
48-58.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.D.Putnam,
M.Hammel,
G.L.Hura,
and
J.A.Tainer
(2007).
X-ray solution scattering (SAXS) combined with crystallography and computation: defining accurate macromolecular structures, conformations and assemblies in solution.
|
| |
Q Rev Biophys,
40,
191-285.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.E.Saunders,
C.Abarrategui-Garrido,
V.Frémeaux-Bacchi,
E.Goicoechea de Jorge,
T.H.Goodship,
M.López Trascasa,
M.Noris,
I.M.Ponce Castro,
G.Remuzzi,
S.Rodríguez de Córdoba,
P.Sánchez-Corral,
C.Skerka,
P.F.Zipfel,
and
S.J.Perkins
(2007).
The interactive Factor H-atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome mutation database and website: update and integration of membrane cofactor protein and Factor I mutations with structural models.
|
| |
Hum Mutat,
28,
222-234.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Zhang,
and
D.Morikis
(2006).
Immunophysical properties and prediction of activities for vaccinia virus complement control protein and smallpox inhibitor of complement enzymes using molecular dynamics and electrostatics.
|
| |
Biophys J,
90,
3106-3119.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |