 |
PDBsum entry 1w0r
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
* C-alpha coords only
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
343:1327-1343
(2004)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The dimeric and trimeric solution structures of the multidomain complement protein properdin by X-ray scattering, analytical ultracentrifugation and constrained modelling.
|
|
Z.Sun,
K.B.Reid,
S.J.Perkins.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Properdin regulates the alternative pathway of the complement system of immune
defence by stabilising the C3 convertase complex. It contains six thrombospondin
repeat type I (TSR-1 to TSR-6) domains and an N-terminal domain. Properdin
exists as either a dimer, trimer or tetramer. In order to determine the solution
structure of multiple TSR domains, the molecular structures of dimeric and
trimeric properdin were studied by X-ray scattering and analytical
ultracentrifugation. Guinier analyses showed that the dimer and trimer have
radii of gyration R(G) values of 7.5 nm and 10.3 nm, respectively, and
cross-sectional radii of gyration R(XS) values of 1.3 nm and 1.5 nm,
respectively. Distance distribution functions showed that the maximum lengths of
the dimer and trimer were 25 nm and 30 nm, respectively. Analytical
ultracentrifugation gave sedimentation coefficients of 5.1S and 5.2S for the
dimer and trimer forms, respectively. Homology models for the TSR domains were
constructed using the crystal structure of the TSP-2 and TSP-3 domains in human
thrombospondin as templates. Properdin could be represented by seven TSR
domains, not six as believed, since the crystal structure determined for TSP-2
and TSP-3 showed that the N-terminal domain (TSR-0) could be represented by a
truncated TSR domain with the same six conserved Cys residues found in TSR-1 to
TSR-6. Automated constrained molecular modelling revealed the solution
conformations of multiple TSR domains in properdin at medium resolution. The
comparison of 3125 systematically generated conformational models for the trimer
with the X-ray data showed that good curve fits could be obtained by assuming
that the linker between adjacent TSR domains possessed limited flexibility. Good
trimer models correspond to partially collapsed triangular structures, and
extended triangular shapes do not fit the data. The corresponding 3125 models
for the dimer revealed a similar outcome in which a partially collapsed TSR
structure gave good fits. The models account for the effect of mutations that
cause properdin deficiencies, and suggest that the biologically active TSR-4,
TSR-5 and TSR-6 domains are exposed for protein-protein interactions. The role
of the other TSR domains in properdin may be to act as spacers to make TSR-4,
TSR-5 and TSR-6 accessible for function.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Schematic cartoon of the TSR arrangement in the
properdin dimer and trimer. The full-length TSR domains are
numbered from TSR-1 to TSR-6, while the putative truncated
N-terminal TSR domain is denoted by TSR-0. The location of the
presumed N-linked glycosylation site on TSR-6 is denoted by a q
symbol. Both these domain arrangements are drawn for clarity,
however neither of these arrangements fit the scattering
modelling (see Figure 8(b) and (d) below).
|
 |
Figure 11.
Figure 11. Electrostatic views of the properdin monomer.
The extended model is shown for clarity. The blue and red
colours denote positively and negatively charged surfaces,
respectively. (a) Three views are shown of the four-domain
N-terminal half, which is comprised of TSR-0 to TSR-3. The
ribbon view showing the location of the TSR domains is shown to
the left. The electrostatic surface view to the left corresponds
to the view of the ribbon representation, while that to the
right corresponds to an 180° rotation about the vertical
axis. (b) Three views are shown likewise for the four-domain
C-terminal half, which is comprised of TSR-3 to TSR-6.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2004,
343,
1327-1343)
copyright 2004.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
J.S.Philo
(2011).
Limiting the sedimentation coefficient for sedimentation velocity data analysis: partial boundary modeling and g(s) approaches revisited.
|
| |
Anal Biochem,
412,
189-202.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Kemper,
J.P.Atkinson,
and
D.E.Hourcade
(2010).
Properdin: emerging roles of a pattern-recognition molecule.
|
| |
Annu Rev Immunol,
28,
131-155.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.J.Perkins,
A.I.Okemefuna,
R.Nan,
K.Li,
and
A.Bonner
(2009).
Constrained solution scattering modelling of human antibodies and complement proteins reveals novel biological insights.
|
| |
J R Soc Interface,
6,
S679-S696.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Liu,
and
D.F.Mosher
(2009).
Interactions among stalk modules of thrombospondin-1.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
28563-28570.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Couvreur,
J.Beaufays,
C.Charon,
K.Lahaye,
F.Gensale,
V.Denis,
B.Charloteaux,
Y.Decrem,
P.P.Prévôt,
M.Brossard,
L.Vanhamme,
and
E.Godfroid
(2008).
Variability and Action Mechanism of a Family of Anticomplement Proteins in Ixodes ricinus.
|
| |
PLoS ONE,
3,
e1400.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Wang,
S.Bansal,
M.Jiang,
and
J.H.Prestegard
(2008).
RDC-assisted modeling of symmetric protein homo-oligomers.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
17,
899-907.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Kimura,
T.Miwa,
L.Zhou,
and
W.C.Song
(2008).
Activator-specific requirement of properdin in the initiation and amplification of the alternative pathway complement.
|
| |
Blood,
111,
732-740.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.D.Putnam,
M.Hammel,
G.L.Hura,
and
J.A.Tainer
(2007).
X-ray solution scattering (SAXS) combined with crystallography and computation: defining accurate macromolecular structures, conformations and assemblies in solution.
|
| |
Q Rev Biophys,
40,
191-285.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.D.van Dijk,
R.Boelens,
and
A.M.Bonvin
(2005).
Data-driven docking for the study of biomolecular complexes.
|
| |
FEBS J,
272,
293-312.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.V.Petoukhov,
and
D.I.Svergun
(2005).
Global rigid body modeling of macromolecular complexes against small-angle scattering data.
|
| |
Biophys J,
89,
1237-1250.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
|
');
}
}
 |