 |
PDBsum entry 1v8j
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structural protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1v8j
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
A common mechanism for microtubule destabilizers-M type kinesins stabilize curling of the protofilament using the class-Specific neck and loops.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
T.Ogawa,
R.Nitta,
Y.Okada,
N.Hirokawa.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Cell, 2004,
116,
591-602.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Unlike other kinesins, middle motor domain-type kinesins depolymerize the
microtubule from its ends. To elucidate its mechanism, we solved the X-ray
crystallographic structure of KIF2C, a murine member of this family. Three major
class-specific features were identified. The class-specific N-terminal neck
adopts a long and rigid helical structure extending out vertically into the
interprotofilament groove. This structure explains its dual roles in targeting
to the end of the microtubule and in destabilization of the lateral interaction
of the protofilament. The loop L2 forms a unique finger-like structure, long and
rigid enough to reach the next tubulin subunit to stabilize the peeling of the
protofilament. The open conformation of the switch I loop could be reversed by
the shift of the microtubule binding L8 loop, suggesting its role as the sensor
to trigger ATP hydrolysis. Mutational analysis supports these structural
implications.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. The Open Conformation of the Nucleotide Binding
Pocket of KIF2C in the AMP-PNP Form(A) Comparison of the
structures of KIF2C in the ADP form (red) and in the AMP-PNP
form (blue). The interaction between the neck (green) and the
KVD-finger (pink) is also shown. Note the disulfide bond
(yellow) between the neck and the KVD-finger.(B) Comparison of
the configuration of the switch I and switch II regions of KIF1A
(purple) and KIF2C (blue). Although both structures are of the
AMP-PXP (X = C or N) form, the switch I loop is distant from the
γ-phosphate due to the rotation of α3. To move the switch I
loop closer to the γ-phosphate, α3 must be rotated as shown by
the yellow arrows. This rotation may be triggered by the
preceding L8 loop. This open conformation of the switch I loop
is similar to the structure of the salt bridge mutant (R598A) of
Kar3. The structures of the wild-type (purple) and R598A mutant
(blue) of Kar3 are shown for comparison (C). The mutation
resulted in the rotation of α3 and the switch I loop moved away
from the nucleotide binding pocket (yellow arrow).
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Structural Model of the Mechanism of MT
Depolymerization by KIF-M(A) ADP bound KIF-M (light blue) binds
to the side wall of the MT.(B) The neck helix (green) interferes
with the M loop in the interprotofilament groove, and KIF-M
cannot bind tightly to the side wall of the MT. The nucleotide
binding pocket is trapped in the open state. Thus, ATP bound
KIF-M diffuses along the MT protofilament.(C) When KIF-M reaches
the end of the MT, the curved conformation of the protofilament
allows full contact with KIF-M. The L8 loop (blue) closes the
nucleotide binding pocket and ATP hydrolysis takes place. The
neck helix destabilizes the lateral interaction of the
protofilament, and the KVD-finger (red) stabilizes the curved
conformation of the interdimer groove.(D) Tubulin dimer or
oligomer is spontaneously released from the curved end of the
protofilament.Hydrolysis of ATP on the tubulin dimer (or
oligomer) releases KIF-M and the next cycle starts.
Alternatively, only the tubulin dimer is released and KIF-M
remains on the protofilament, sliding back to release the next
tubulin dimer processively (C′ and D′). The same mechanism
can also explain depolymerization from the minus end of MT (E).
Dimerization of KIF-M is not required for this mechanism, but
will further increase the depolymerization activity (F).
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Cell
(2004,
116,
591-602)
copyright 2004.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |