 |
PDBsum entry 1ud7
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Structure Fold Des
7:967-976
(1999)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Solution structure and dynamics of a designed hydrophobic core variant of ubiquitin.
|
|
E.C.Johnson,
G.A.Lazar,
J.R.Desjarlais,
T.M.Handel.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
BACKGROUND: The recent merger of computation and protein design has resulted in
a burst of success in the generation of novel proteins with native-like
properties. A critical component of this coupling between theory and experiment
is a detailed analysis of the structures and stabilities of designed proteins to
assess and improve the accuracy of design algorithms. RESULTS: Here we report
the solution structure of a hydrophobic core variant of ubiquitin, referred to
as 1D7, which was designed with the core-repacking algorithm ROC. As a measure
of conformational specificity, we also present amide exchange protection factors
and backbone and sidechain dynamics. The results indicate that 1D7 is similar to
wild-type (WT) ubiquitin in backbone structure and degree of conformational
specificity. We also observe a good correlation between experimentally
determined sidechain structures and those predicted by ROC. However, evaluation
of the core sidechain conformations indicates that, in general, 1D7 has more
sidechains in less statistically favorable conformations than WT. CONCLUSIONS:
Our results provide an explanation for the lower stability of 1D7 compared to
WT, and suggest modifications to design algorithms that may improve the accuracy
with which structure and stability are predicted. The results also demonstrate
that core packing can affect conformational flexibility in subtle ways that are
likely to be important for the design of function and protein-ligand
interactions.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Structures of 1D7 versus WT. (a) Stereoview of an
ensemble of the 20 lowest energy structures of 1D7. Sidechains
of core residues are displayed in green and the N and C termini
are labeled. (b) Superposition of the structure of 1D7 closest
to the mean (blue) with the crystal structure (red; accession
code 1UBI [15]) the coordinates of which were used for the
design. (c) Residual dipolar NH couplings of partially oriented
1D7 (y axis) versus WT ubiquitin (x axis) in DMPC:DHPC bicelles
[16]. WT dipolar couplings were taken from Cornilescu et al.
[25]. The difference in the range of dipolar couplings between
the two samples is due to differences in bicelle content.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figure is
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Structure Fold Des
(1999,
7,
967-976)
copyright 1999.
|
|
| |
Figure was
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
E.J.Helmreich
(2010).
Ways and means of coping with uncertainties of the relationship of the genetic blue print to protein structure and function in the cell.
|
| |
Cell Commun Signal,
8,
26.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.R.Donald,
and
J.Martin
(2009).
Automated NMR Assignment and Protein Structure Determination using Sparse Dipolar Coupling Constraints.
|
| |
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc,
55,
101-127.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Farès,
N.A.Lakomek,
K.F.Walter,
B.T.Frank,
J.Meiler,
S.Becker,
and
C.Griesinger
(2009).
Accessing ns-micros side chain dynamics in ubiquitin with methyl RDCs.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
45,
23-44.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Bhardwaj,
and
M.Gerstein
(2009).
Relating protein conformational changes to packing efficiency and disorder.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
18,
1230-1240.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.D.Weeks,
K.C.Grasty,
L.Hernandez-Cuebas,
and
P.J.Loll
(2009).
Crystal structures of Lys-63-linked tri- and di-ubiquitin reveal a highly extended chain architecture.
|
| |
Proteins,
77,
753-759.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.P.Mielke,
and
V.V.Krishnan
(2009).
Characterization of protein secondary structure from NMR chemical shifts.
|
| |
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc,
54,
141-165.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Haririnia,
R.Verma,
N.Purohit,
M.Z.Twarog,
R.J.Deshaies,
D.Bolon,
and
D.Fushman
(2008).
Mutations in the hydrophobic core of ubiquitin differentially affect its recognition by receptor proteins.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
375,
979-996.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.A.Crowhurst,
and
S.L.Mayo
(2008).
NMR-detected conformational exchange observed in a computationally designed variant of protein Gbeta1.
|
| |
Protein Eng Des Sel,
21,
577-587.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.A.Lakomek,
K.F.Walter,
C.Farès,
O.F.Lange,
B.L.de Groot,
H.Grubmüller,
R.Brüschweiler,
A.Munk,
S.Becker,
J.Meiler,
and
C.Griesinger
(2008).
Self-consistent residual dipolar coupling based model-free analysis for the robust determination of nanosecond to microsecond protein dynamics.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
41,
139-155.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Ding,
and
N.V.Dokholyan
(2006).
Emergence of protein fold families through rational design.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol,
2,
e85.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.A.Lakomek,
T.Carlomagno,
S.Becker,
C.Griesinger,
and
J.Meiler
(2006).
A thorough dynamic interpretation of residual dipolar couplings in ubiquitin.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
34,
101-115.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Dobson,
G.Dantas,
D.Baker,
and
G.Varani
(2006).
High-resolution structural validation of the computational redesign of human U1A protein.
|
| |
Structure,
14,
847-856.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.E.Jackson
(2006).
Ubiquitin: a small protein folding paradigm.
|
| |
Org Biomol Chem,
4,
1845-1853.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.I.Igumenova,
K.K.Frederick,
and
A.J.Wand
(2006).
Characterization of the fast dynamics of protein amino acid side chains using NMR relaxation in solution.
|
| |
Chem Rev,
106,
1672-1699.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Lindorff-Larsen,
R.B.Best,
M.A.Depristo,
C.M.Dobson,
and
M.Vendruscolo
(2005).
Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics.
|
| |
Nature,
433,
128-132.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.J.Langmead,
A.Yan,
R.Lilien,
L.Wang,
and
B.R.Donald
(2004).
A polynomial-time nuclear vector replacement algorithm for automated NMR resonance assignments.
|
| |
J Comput Biol,
11,
277-298.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Liang,
and
N.V.Grishin
(2004).
Effective scoring function for protein sequence design.
|
| |
Proteins,
54,
271-281.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Ventura,
and
L.Serrano
(2004).
Designing proteins from the inside out.
|
| |
Proteins,
56,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Kuhlman,
G.Dantas,
G.C.Ireton,
G.Varani,
B.L.Stoddard,
and
D.Baker
(2003).
Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy.
|
| |
Science,
302,
1364-1368.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.G.Saven
(2002).
Combinatorial protein design.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
12,
453-458.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.M.Kraemer-Pecore,
A.M.Wollacott,
and
J.R.Desjarlais
(2001).
Computational protein design.
|
| |
Curr Opin Chem Biol,
5,
690-695.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.A.Ross,
C.A.Sarisky,
A.Su,
and
S.L.Mayo
(2001).
Designed protein G core variants fold to native-like structures: sequence selection by ORBIT tolerates variation in backbone specification.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
10,
450-454.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Raha,
A.M.Wollacott,
M.J.Italia,
and
J.R.Desjarlais
(2000).
Prediction of amino acid sequence from structure.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
9,
1106-1119.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.B.Hill,
D.P.Raleigh,
A.Lombardi,
and
W.F.DeGrado
(2000).
De novo design of helical bundles as models for understanding protein folding and function.
|
| |
Acc Chem Res,
33,
745-754.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.A.Lazar,
E.C.Johnson,
J.R.Desjarlais,
and
T.M.Handel
(1999).
Rotamer strain as a determinant of protein structural specificity.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
8,
2598-2610.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |