 |
PDBsum entry 1tdq
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extracellular matrix
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1tdq
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Structural basis for interactions between tenascins and lectican c-Type lectin domains: evidence for a crosslinking role for tenascins.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
A.Lundell,
A.I.Olin,
M.Mörgelin,
S.Al-Karadaghi,
A.Aspberg,
D.T.Logan.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Structure, 2004,
12,
1495-1506.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
The C-terminal G3 domains of lecticans mediate crosslinking to diverse
extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins during ECM assembly, through their C-type
lectin (CLD) subdomains. The structure of the rat aggrecan CLD in a
Ca(2+)-dependent complex with fibronectin type III repeats 3-5 of rat tenascin-R
provides detailed support for such crosslinking. The CLD loops bind Ca2+ like
other CLDs, but no carbohydrate binding is observed or possible. This is thus
the first example of a direct Ca(2+)-dependent protein-protein interaction of a
CLD. Surprisingly, tenascin-R does not coordinate the Ca2+ ions directly.
Electron microscopy confirms that full-length tenascin-R and tenascin-C
crosslink hyaluronan-aggrecan complexes. The results are significant for the
binding of all lectican CLDs to tenascin-R and tenascin-C. Comparison of the
protein interaction surface with that of P-selectin in complex with the PGSL-1
peptide suggests that direct protein-protein interactions of Ca(2+)-binding CLDs
may be more widespread than previously appreciated.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Overall Structure of the Complex between the
Aggrecan CLD and FnIII Repeats 3–5 of Tenascin-R, TN3–5
A consistent coloring scheme is used throughout for the
different domains. Surfaces, cartoon elements, and carbon atoms
from domain 3 are colored beige, those in domain 4 are colored
cyan, and those in domain 5 are purple. Figure 2, Figure 3,
Figure 4 and Figure 7 were made using Pymol
(http://www.pymol.org). (A) Secondary structure cartoon.
The three Ca^2+ ions are shown as yellow spheres. The boxes
marked a–c denote the interaction areas for which detailed
views are given in Figures 4A–4C. (B) Surface
representation colored by domain. (C) Exploded “open
book” view of the interaction surface. The aggrecan CLD has
been rotated 90° around a horizontal axis in the plane of
the paper, TN3–5 in the opposite direction. The cyan and
purple patches on the surface of the CLD represent the
interaction areas with TN4 and TN5, respectively. Similarly, the
maroon patches on the surface of TN3–5 represent the
interaction area with the CLD. (D) The aggrecan CLD amino
acid residues mediating interaction with tenascin-R form a
surface corresponding to the sulfopeptide binding surface of
P-selectin in complex with PSGL-1 (Somers et al., 2000). The
interaction surface of P-selectin with the protein part of the
PSGL-1 sulfoglycopeptide on is colored cyan, and the
carbohydrate interaction surface is colored purple. The part of
the PSGL-1 peptide visible in the crystal structure is shown as
a ball-and-stick model. The figure is in the same orientation as
the lower part of Figure 2C, showing the interaction surface of
tenascin-R on aggrecan.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Details of the Interactions between the Aggrecan
CLD and TN3–5 Important interacting side chains are shown
as ball-and-stick, and the central hydrogen bonds are
highlighted. The color scheme is as described in the legend to
Figure 2. (A) Molecular interactions of the hydrophobic
patch on loop L4 of the aggrecan CLD. The view is approximately
the same as in Figure 2A. (B) Interactions involving the
CC′ loop in TN4. The view is approximately as in (A). (C)
Interactions of the TN4–5 linker region and the FG loop on
TN5. The molecule has been rotated by approximately 180°
around a vertical axis to make the interactions clearer; i.e.,
the view is from the back of the molecule as seen in Figure 2A.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Structure
(2004,
12,
1495-1506)
copyright 2004.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |