|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
102:3366-3371
(2005)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
An atomic resolution view of ICAM recognition in a complex between the binding domains of ICAM-3 and integrin alphaLbeta2.
|
|
G.Song,
Y.Yang,
J.H.Liu,
J.M.Casasnovas,
M.Shimaoka,
T.A.Springer,
J.H.Wang.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Within the Ig superfamily (IgSF), intercellular adhesion molecules (ICAMs) form
a subfamily that binds the leukocyte integrin alphaLbeta2. We report a
1.65-A-resolution crystal structure of the ICAM-3 N-terminal domain (D1) in
complex with the inserted domain, the ligand-binding domain of alphaLbeta2. This
high-resolution structure and comparisons among ICAM subfamily members establish
that the binding of ICAM-3 D1 onto the inserted domain represents a common
docking mode for ICAM subfamily members. The markedly different off-rates of
ICAM-1, -2, and -3 appear to be determined by the hydrophobicity of residues
that surround a metal coordination bond in the alphaLbeta2-binding interfaces.
Variation in composition of glycans on the periphery of the interfaces
influences on-rate.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. The ICAM-3/ [L] [2] binding interface.
(A) The interface residues are shown in light cyan and light
gold for ICAM-3 and the I domain, respectively. The metal ion,
oxygens, and nitrogens are shown as magenta, red, and blue
spheres, respectively. Water molecules are shown as red spheres.
Metal coordination is shown by black dashed lines. Hydrogen
bonds and a salt bridge between Lys-42 in ICAM-3 and Glu-241 in
the I domain are represented by silver dashed lines. Residues
involved in the hydrophobic patch are colored in silver. For
clarity, MIDAS residues are omitted. (B) Structural elements
that stabilize the conformation of the CD loop of ICAM-3. The CD
and EF loops are colored in yellow and green, respectively. Only
relevant side chains are shown in this figure for clarity.
Hydrophobic, neutral hydrophilic, and basic residues are colored
in orange, cyan, and blue, respectively. The broken lines
represent hydrogen bonds, whereas the silver ball is a bound
water molecule. A was prepared with RIBBONS (43), and B was
prepared with SETOR (44).
|
 |
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. Surface representation of the binding faces of
ICAM-3 and -1. Negatively and positively charged residues are
colored red and blue, respectively. Hydrophobic and neutral
hydrophilic residues are colored white and yellow, respectively.
Some important residues are labeled. The binding footprints are
encircled with green dashed lines. Prepared with GRASP (45).
|
 |
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
R.P.McEver,
and
C.Zhu
(2010).
Rolling cell adhesion.
|
| |
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol,
26,
363-396.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Zhang,
J.H.Liu,
W.Yang,
T.Springer,
M.Shimaoka,
and
J.H.Wang
(2009).
Structural basis of activation-dependent binding of ligand-mimetic antibody AL-57 to integrin LFA-1.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
18345-18350.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Tan,
M.Duquette,
A.Joachimiak,
and
J.Lawler
(2009).
The crystal structure of the signature domain of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein: implications for collagen, glycosaminoglycan and integrin binding.
|
| |
FASEB J,
23,
2490-2501.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Li,
C.Cao,
W.Jia,
L.Yu,
M.Mo,
Q.Wang,
Y.Huang,
J.M.Lim,
M.Ishihara,
L.Wells,
P.Azadi,
H.Robinson,
Y.W.He,
L.Zhang,
and
R.A.Mariuzza
(2009).
Structure of the F-spondin domain of mindin, an integrin ligand and pattern recognition molecule.
|
| |
EMBO J,
28,
286-297.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Zhang,
J.M.Casasnovas,
M.Jin,
J.H.Liu,
C.G.Gahmberg,
T.A.Springer,
and
J.H.Wang
(2008).
An unusual allosteric mobility of the C-terminal helix of a high-affinity alphaL integrin I domain variant bound to ICAM-5.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
31,
432-437.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Iskandarsyah,
B.A.Tejo,
U.S.Tambunan,
G.Verkhivker,
and
T.J.Siahaan
(2008).
Structural modifications of ICAM-1 cyclic peptides to improve the activity to inhibit heterotypic adhesion of T cells.
|
| |
Chem Biol Drug Des,
72,
27-33.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.R.Aricescu,
and
E.Y.Jones
(2007).
Immunoglobulin superfamily cell adhesion molecules: zippers and signals.
|
| |
Curr Opin Cell Biol,
19,
543-550.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.H.Luo,
C.V.Carman,
and
T.A.Springer
(2007).
Structural basis of integrin regulation and signaling.
|
| |
Annu Rev Immunol,
25,
619-647.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Takagi
(2007).
Structural basis for ligand recognition by integrins.
|
| |
Curr Opin Cell Biol,
19,
557-564.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.D.Perez,
D.Mitchell,
and
G.P.Nolan
(2007).
Differential role of ICAM ligands in determination of human memory T cell differentiation.
|
| |
BMC Immunol,
8,
2.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Vorup-Jensen,
T.T.Waldron,
N.Astrof,
M.Shimaoka,
and
T.A.Springer
(2007).
The connection between metal ion affinity and ligand affinity in integrin I domains.
|
| |
Biochim Biophys Acta,
1774,
1148-1155.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.P.Wojcikiewicz,
M.H.Abdulreda,
X.Zhang,
and
V.T.Moy
(2006).
Force spectroscopy of LFA-1 and its ligands, ICAM-1 and ICAM-2.
|
| |
Biomacromolecules,
7,
3188-3195.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Song,
G.A.Lazar,
T.Kortemme,
M.Shimaoka,
J.R.Desjarlais,
D.Baker,
and
T.A.Springer
(2006).
Rational design of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) variants for antagonizing integrin lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1-dependent adhesion.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
281,
5042-5049.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Shimaoka,
M.Kim,
E.H.Cohen,
W.Yang,
N.Astrof,
D.Peer,
A.Salas,
A.Ferrand,
and
T.A.Springer
(2006).
AL-57, a ligand-mimetic antibody to integrin LFA-1, reveals chemokine-induced affinity up-regulation in lymphocytes.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
103,
13991-13996.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.L.Rich,
and
D.G.Myszka
(2006).
Survey of the year 2005 commercial optical biosensor literature.
|
| |
J Mol Recognit,
19,
478-534.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Yang,
C.V.Carman,
M.Kim,
A.Salas,
M.Shimaoka,
and
T.A.Springer
(2006).
A small molecule agonist of an integrin, alphaLbeta2.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
281,
37904-37912.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |