 |
PDBsum entry 1s9t
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membrane protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1s9t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Crystal structures of the glur5 and glur6 ligand binding cores: molecular mechanisms underlying kainate receptor selectivity.
|
 |
|
Author
|
 |
M.L.Mayer.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Neuron, 2005,
45,
539-552.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying differences in the
ligand binding properties of AMPA, kainate, and NMDA subtype glutamate
receptors. Crystal structures of the GluR5 and GluR6 kainate receptor ligand
binding cores in complexes with glutamate, 2S,4R-4-methylglutamate, kainate, and
quisqualate have now been solved. The structures reveal that the ligand binding
cavities are 40% (GluR5) and 16% (GluR6) larger than for GluR2. The binding of
AMPA- and GluR5-selective agonists to GluR6 is prevented by steric occlusion,
which also interferes with the high-affinity binding of 2S,4R-4-methylglutamate
to AMPA receptors. Strikingly, the extent of domain closure produced by the
GluR6 partial agonist kainate is only 3 degrees less than for glutamate and 11
degrees greater than for the GluR2 kainate complex. This, together with
extensive interdomain contacts between domains 1 and 2 of GluR5 and GluR6,
absent from AMPA receptors, likely contributes to the high stability of GluR5
and GluR6 kainate complexes.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Docking GluR5-Selective Ligands in the GluR6 and
GluR5 Ligand Binding Sites
|
 |
Figure 7.
Figure 7. Interdomain Contacts in GluR5 and GluR2
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Neuron
(2005,
45,
539-552)
copyright 2005.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |