 |
PDBsum entry 1p69
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Viral protein/receptor
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1p69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Structural basis for variation in adenovirus affinity for the cellular coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
J.Howitt,
M.C.Bewley,
V.Graziano,
J.M.Flanagan,
P.Freimuth.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Biol Chem, 2003,
278,
26208-26215.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
The majority of adenovirus serotypes can bind to the coxsackievirus and
adenovirus receptor (CAR) on human cells despite only limited conservation of
the amino acid residues that comprise the receptor-binding sites of these
viruses. Using a fluorescence anisotropy-based assay, we determined that the
recombinant knob domain of the fiber protein from adenovirus serotype (Ad) 2
binds the soluble, N-terminal domain (domain 1 (D1)) of CAR with 8-fold greater
affinity than does the recombinant knob domain from Ad12. Homology modeling
predicted that the increased affinity of Ad2 knob for CAR D1 could result from
additional contacts within the binding interface contributed by two residues,
Ser408 and Tyr477, which are not conserved in the Ad12 knob. Consistent with
this structural model, substitution of serine and tyrosine for the corresponding
residues in the Ad12 knob (P417S and S489Y) increased the binding affinity by 4-
and 8-fold, respectively, whereas the double mutation increased binding affinity
10-fold. X-ray structure analysis of Ad12 knob mutants P417S and S489Y indicated
that both substituted residues potentially could form additional hydrogen bonds
across the knob-CAR interface. Structural changes resulting from these mutations
were highly localized, implying that the high tolerance for surface variation
conferred by the stable knob scaffold can minimize the impact of antigenic drift
on binding specificity and affinity during evolution of virus serotypes. Our
results suggest that the interaction of knob domains from different adenovirus
serotypes with CAR D1 can be accurately modeled using the Ad12 knob-CAR D1
crystal structure as a template.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
FIG. 3. Homology model of Ad2 knob bound to CAR D1. The
x-ray structure of Ad2 knob was overlaid onto Ad12 knob in the
x-ray structure of the Ad12 knob-CAR D1 complex. For simplicity,
only one monomer of the knob trimer is shown. The surface of CAR
D1 (space-filling model on left) is colored blue. Superimposed
ribbon structures of Ad2 knob and Ad12 knob are colored cyan and
green, respectively. Side chain residues of Ad12 knob contacting
CAR D1 are shown in gray except for side chains of Ser489 and
Pro417, which are shown in red. Ad2 knob Ser408 and Tyr477 side
chains are colored yellow.
|
 |
Figure 5.
FIG. 5. Comparison of crystal structures of wild type Ad12
knob-CAR D1 and Ad12 knob P417S-CAR D1. a, stereo figure showing
part of the wild type Ad12 knob-CAR D1 interface including CAR
D1 residues I55-E56-W57 (cyan) and Ad12 knob residues
P416-P417-P418 (yellow); no hydrogen bonds are formed at this
interface. b, stereo figure of same view of the interface
between Ad12 knob mutant P417S (blue) and CAR D1 (red); note the
novel hydrogen bond formed between Ser417 of knob and Glu56 of
CAR D1.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2003,
278,
26208-26215)
copyright 2003.
|
 |
|
Secondary reference #1
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Structural analysis of the mechanism of adenovirus binding to its human cellular receptor, Car.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
M.C.Bewley,
K.Springer,
Y.B.Zhang,
P.Freimuth,
J.M.Flanagan.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Science, 1999,
286,
1579-1583.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Fig. 2. A molecular surface representation of the interface in
the Ad12 knob-CAR D1 complex. (A) Sequence conservation surface
diagram of two knob monomers viewed at the CAR interface. The
molecules are colored on a sliding scale from white (conserved)
to red (nonconserved). Conservation analysis was based on an
alignment of all human Ad knob sequences available in GenBank. A
white strip of conservation transects the surface of the
molecule. Upon binding, the CAR D1 molecule occludes the
conserved strip on Ad12 knob. (B) Surface diagram of two
adjacent Ad12 knob monomers shown in the same view as (A). The
molecules are colored on a sliding scale from yellow (contact)
to red (no contact). Atoms in contact with CAR D1 are shared
between monomers. (C) Surface diagram of CAR D1. The molecules
are colored on a sliding scale from magenta (contact) to cyan
(no contact). This figure was generated with GRASP (30).
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. CPK model of the region around the cavity. The three
consecutive proline residues in Ad12 knob partially shape the
cavity, which is colored magenta. The AB loop, whose carbon
atoms are colored yellow, lines one side of the cavity. The
carbon atoms from the remainder of the monomer are colored red,
those of the second knob monomer, green, and those of CAR D1,
cyan. All oxygen and nitrogen atoms are colored light red and
blue, respectively. The cavity is lined with atoms from residues
,
(backbone),
(side),
V448 (side), (backbone),
V450, L455 (side), Q535 (side), P573 (side), and S575 (side)
from one Ad12 knob; S514 (backbone), A515 (backbone), (side),
N520 (side), A524 (main), E523, K525, and S526 (side) from the
other Ad12 knob; and L39 (side), K47 (backbone), V48 (backbone),
D49, Q50, V51, and K102 (side) from CAR. The underlined residues
are conserved or similar in all CAR-binding Ad serotypes.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reproduced from the cited reference
with permission from the AAAs
|
 |
|
Secondary reference #2
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor amino-Terminal immunoglobulin v-Related domain binds adenovirus type 2 and fiber knob from adenovirus type 12.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
P.Freimuth,
K.Springer,
C.Berard,
J.Hainfeld,
M.Bewley,
J.Flanagan.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Virol, 1999,
73,
1392-1398.
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |