 |
PDBsum entry 1p2j
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrolase/hydrolase inhibitor
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1p2j
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Structural consequences of accommodation of four non-Cognate amino acid residues in the s1 pocket of bovine trypsin and chymotrypsin.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
R.Helland,
H.Czapinska,
I.Leiros,
M.Olufsen,
J.Otlewski,
A.O.Smalås.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Mol Biol, 2003,
333,
845-861.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Crystal structures of P1 Gly, Val, Leu and Phe bovine pancreatic trypsin
inhibitor (BPTI) variants in complex with two serine proteinases, bovine trypsin
and chymotrypsin, have been determined. The association constants for the four
mutants with the two enzymes show that the enlargement of the volume of the P1
residue is accompanied by an increase of the binding energy, which is more
pronounced for bovine chymotrypsin. Since the conformation of the P1 side-chains
in the two S1 pockets is very similar, we suggest that the difference in DeltaG
values between the enzymes must arise from the more polar environment of the S1
site of trypsin. This results mainly from the substitutions of Met192 and Ser189
observed in chymotrypsin with Gln192 and Asp189 present in trypsin. The more
polar interior of the S1 site of trypsin is reflected by a much higher order of
the solvent network in the empty pocket of the enzyme, as is observed in the
complexes of the two enzymes with the P1 Gly BPTI variant. The more optimal
binding of the large hydrophobic P1 residues by chymotrypsin is also reflected
by shrinkage of the S1 pocket upon the accommodation of the cognate residues of
this enzyme. Conversely, the S1 pocket of trypsin expands upon binding of such
side-chains, possibly to avoid interaction with the polar residues of the walls.
Further differentiation between the two enzymes is achieved by small differences
in the shape of the S1 sites, resulting in an unequal steric hindrance of some
of the side-chains, as observed for the gamma-branched P1 Leu variant of BPTI,
which is much more favored by bovine chymotrypsin than trypsin. Analysis of the
discrimination of beta-branched residues by trypsin and chymotrypsin is based on
the complexes with the P1 Val BPTI variant. Steric repulsion of the P1 Val
residue by the walls of the S1 pocket of both enzymes prevents the P1 Val
side-chain from adopting the most optimal chi1 value.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Electron density of the P1 residue, Met192 and
solvent molecules in the chymotrypsin-BPTI complexes: (a) P1
Gly, (b) P1 Val, (c) P1 Leu and (d) P1 Phe: 2F[o] -F[c] density
is colored blue at 1s, and F[o] -F[c] density is colored green
at 3s.
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. P1 Gly BPTI-binding epitope (residues 11-19 and
38-40) on the electrostatic surface of trypsin (left) and
chymotrypsin (right). The Figure was made using ICM (MolSoft
LLC, La Jolla).
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2003,
333,
845-861)
copyright 2003.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |