 |
PDBsum entry 1p1n
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membrane protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1p1n
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
100:5736-5741
(2003)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Tuning activation of the AMPA-sensitive GluR2 ion channel by genetic adjustment of agonist-induced conformational changes.
|
|
N.Armstrong,
M.Mayer,
E.Gouaux.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The (S)-2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole) propionic acid (AMPA)
receptor discriminates between agonists in terms of binding and channel gating;
AMPA is a high-affinity full agonist, whereas kainate is a low-affinity partial
agonist. Although there is extensive literature on the functional
characterization of partial agonist activity in ion channels, structure-based
mechanisms are scarce. Here we investigate the role of Leu-650, a binding cleft
residue conserved among AMPA receptors, in maintaining agonist specificity and
regulating agonist binding and channel gating by using physiological, x-ray
crystallographic, and biochemical techniques. Changing Leu-650 to Thr yields a
receptor that responds more potently and efficaciously to kainate and less
potently and efficaciously to AMPA relative to the WT receptor. Crystal
structures of the Leu-650 to Thr mutant reveal an increase in domain closure in
the kainate-bound state and a partially closed and a fully closed conformation
in the AMPA-bound form. Our results indicate that agonists can induce a range of
conformations in the GluR2 ligand-binding core and that domain closure is
directly correlated to channel activation. The partially closed, AMPA-bound
conformation of the L650T mutant likely captures the structure of an
agonist-bound, inactive state of the receptor. Together with previously solved
structures, we have determined a mechanism of agonist binding and subsequent
conformational rearrangements.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. Comparison of WT and S1S2J L650T/AMPA(AS)
conformations. (A) Superposition of WT S1S2J/AMPA (gray) with
S1S2J L650T/AMPA (AS form) protomer A (blue). (B) Superposition
of WT S1S2J/AMPA (gray) with S1S2J L650T/AMPA(AS) protomer B
(green). The black arrows in A and B indicate the axis of
rotation relating the conformational difference between the WT
and L650T structures. (C) Superimposed WT and mutant AMPA dimers.
|
 |
Figure 6.
Fig. 6. Mechanism of agonist binding and domain closure.
(A) The binding site of the open-cleft, closed-channel state
(Apo S1S2J, protomer A). (B) The possible first step in agonist
binding as observed in molecule B of the L650T/AMPA(AS)
structure. We suggest that this semiclosed cleft conformation
represents the agonist-bound, closed-channel state. (C) The
closed-cleft, open-channel conformation as observed in the WT
S1S2J/AMPA binding cleft (protomer A). In B and C, water
molecules are shown as green spheres, AMPA is drawn in magenta,
and hydrogen bonds are depicted by black dashed lines. The
degrees of domain closure relative to the Apo conformation are
indicated below each structure.
|
 |
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
C.F.Landes,
A.Rambhadran,
J.N.Taylor,
F.Salatan,
and
V.Jayaraman
(2011).
Structural landscape of isolated agonist-binding domains from single AMPA receptors.
|
| |
Nat Chem Biol,
7,
168-173.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Pøhlsgaard,
K.Frydenvang,
U.Madsen,
and
J.S.Kastrup
(2011).
Lessons from more than 80 structures of the GluA2 ligand-binding domain in complex with agonists, antagonists and allosteric modulators.
|
| |
Neuropharmacology,
60,
135-150.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Birdsey-Benson,
A.Gill,
L.P.Henderson,
and
D.R.Madden
(2010).
Enhanced efficacy without further cleft closure: reevaluating twist as a source of agonist efficacy in AMPA receptors.
|
| |
J Neurosci,
30,
1463-1470.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.K.Fenwick,
and
R.E.Oswald
(2010).
On the mechanisms of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor binding to glutamate and kainate.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
285,
12334-12343.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.A.Postila,
G.T.Swanson,
and
O.T.Pentikäinen
(2010).
Exploring kainate receptor pharmacology using molecular dynamics simulations.
|
| |
Neuropharmacology,
58,
515-527.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Edwards,
J.Madine,
L.Fielding,
and
D.A.Middleton
(2010).
Measurement of multiple torsional angles from one-dimensional solid-state NMR spectra: application to the conformational analysis of a ligand in its biological receptor site.
|
| |
Phys Chem Chem Phys,
12,
13999-14008.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Nakagawa
(2010).
The biochemistry, ultrastructure, and subunit assembly mechanism of AMPA receptors.
|
| |
Mol Neurobiol,
42,
161-184.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
U.Das,
J.Kumar,
M.L.Mayer,
and
A.J.Plested
(2010).
Domain organization and function in GluK2 subtype kainate receptors.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
8463-8468.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.H.Ahmed,
M.D.Thompson,
M.K.Fenwick,
B.Romero,
A.P.Loh,
D.E.Jane,
H.Sondermann,
and
R.E.Oswald
(2009).
Mechanisms of antagonism of the GluR2 AMPA receptor: structure and dynamics of the complex of two willardiine antagonists with the glutamate binding domain.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
48,
3894-3903.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.J.Plested,
and
M.L.Mayer
(2009).
AMPA receptor ligand binding domain mobility revealed by functional cross linking.
|
| |
J Neurosci,
29,
11912-11923.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Frydenvang,
L.L.Lash,
P.Naur,
P.A.Postila,
D.S.Pickering,
C.M.Smith,
M.Gajhede,
M.Sasaki,
R.Sakai,
O.T.Pentikaïnen,
G.T.Swanson,
and
J.S.Kastrup
(2009).
Full domain closure of the ligand-binding core of the ionotropic glutamate receptor iGluR5 induced by the high affinity agonist dysiherbaine and the functional antagonist 8,9-dideoxyneodysiherbaine.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
14219-14229.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Du,
A.Rambhadran,
and
V.Jayaraman
(2009).
Vibrational spectroscopic investigation of the ligand binding domain of kainate receptors.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
18,
1585-1591.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Gill,
A.Birdsey-Benson,
B.L.Jones,
L.P.Henderson,
and
D.R.Madden
(2008).
Correlating AMPA receptor activation and cleft closure across subunits: crystal structures of the GluR4 ligand-binding domain in complex with full and partial agonists.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
47,
13831-13841.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.S.Maltsev,
A.H.Ahmed,
M.K.Fenwick,
D.E.Jane,
and
R.E.Oswald
(2008).
Mechanism of partial agonism at the GluR2 AMPA receptor: Measurements of lobe orientation in solution.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
47,
10600-10610.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.J.Bjerrum,
and
P.C.Biggin
(2008).
Rigid body essential X-ray crystallography: distinguishing the bend and twist of glutamate receptor ligand binding domains.
|
| |
Proteins,
72,
434-446.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Gonzalez,
A.Rambhadran,
M.Du,
and
V.Jayaraman
(2008).
LRET investigations of conformational changes in the ligand binding domain of a functional AMPA receptor.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
47,
10027-10032.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.A.Mankiewicz,
A.Rambhadran,
L.Wathen,
and
V.Jayaraman
(2008).
Chemical interplay in the mechanism of partial agonist activation in alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
47,
398-404.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.K.Fenwick,
and
R.E.Oswald
(2008).
NMR spectroscopy of the ligand-binding core of ionotropic glutamate receptor 2 bound to 5-substituted willardiine partial agonists.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
378,
673-685.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.L.Blanke,
and
A.M.VanDongen
(2008).
Constitutive activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor via cleft-spanning disulfide bonds.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
21519-21529.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Yao,
C.B.Harrison,
P.L.Freddolino,
K.Schulten,
and
M.L.Mayer
(2008).
Molecular mechanism of ligand recognition by NR3 subtype glutamate receptors.
|
| |
EMBO J,
27,
2158-2170.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Y.Lau,
and
B.Roux
(2007).
The free energy landscapes governing conformational changes in a glutamate receptor ligand-binding domain.
|
| |
Structure,
15,
1203-1214.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.A.Mankiewicz,
A.Rambhadran,
M.Du,
G.Ramanoudjame,
and
V.Jayaraman
(2007).
Role of the chemical interactions of the agonist in controlling alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor activation.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
46,
1343-1349.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.A.Mankiewicz,
and
V.Jayaraman
(2007).
Glutamate receptors as seen by light: spectroscopic studies of structure-function relationships.
|
| |
Braz J Med Biol Res,
40,
1419-1427.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Menuz,
R.M.Stroud,
R.A.Nicoll,
and
F.A.Hays
(2007).
TARP auxiliary subunits switch AMPA receptor antagonists into partial agonists.
|
| |
Science,
318,
815-817.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Du,
H.Ulrich,
X.Zhao,
J.Aronowski,
and
V.Jayaraman
(2007).
Water soluble RNA based antagonist of AMPA receptors.
|
| |
Neuropharmacology,
53,
242-251.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.S.Walker,
M.M.Francis,
P.J.Brockie,
D.M.Madsen,
Y.Zheng,
and
A.V.Maricq
(2006).
Conserved SOL-1 proteins regulate ionotropic glutamate receptor desensitization.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
103,
10787-10792.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.S.Walker,
P.J.Brockie,
D.M.Madsen,
M.M.Francis,
Y.Zheng,
S.Koduri,
J.E.Mellem,
N.Strutz-Seebohm,
and
A.V.Maricq
(2006).
Reconstitution of invertebrate glutamate receptor function depends on stargazin-like proteins.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
103,
10781-10786.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Ramanoudjame,
M.Du,
K.A.Mankiewicz,
and
V.Jayaraman
(2006).
Allosteric mechanism in AMPA receptors: a FRET-based investigation of conformational changes.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
103,
10473-10478.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Cohen-Kashi Malina,
Y.Ganor,
M.Levite,
and
V.I.Teichberg
(2006).
Autoantibodies against an extracellular peptide of the GluR3 subtype of AMPA receptors activate both homomeric and heteromeric AMPA receptor channels.
|
| |
Neurochem Res,
31,
1181-1190.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.C.Weston,
P.Schuck,
A.Ghosal,
C.Rosenmund,
and
M.L.Mayer
(2006).
Conformational restriction blocks glutamate receptor desensitization.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
13,
1120-1127.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.L.Mayer
(2006).
Glutamate receptors at atomic resolution.
|
| |
Nature,
440,
456-462.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.E.Chen,
and
D.J.Wyllie
(2006).
Pharmacological insights obtained from structure-function studies of ionotropic glutamate receptors.
|
| |
Br J Pharmacol,
147,
839-853.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
U.Pentikäinen,
L.Settimo,
M.S.Johnson,
and
O.T.Pentikäinen
(2006).
Subtype selectivity and flexibility of ionotropic glutamate receptors upon antagonist ligand binding.
|
| |
Org Biomol Chem,
4,
1058-1070.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Zhang,
A.Robert,
S.B.Vogensen,
and
J.R.Howe
(2006).
The relationship between agonist potency and AMPA receptor kinetics.
|
| |
Biophys J,
91,
1336-1346.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Zheng,
P.J.Brockie,
J.E.Mellem,
D.M.Madsen,
C.S.Walker,
M.M.Francis,
and
A.V.Maricq
(2006).
SOL-1 is an auxiliary subunit that modulates the gating of GLR-1 glutamate receptors in Caenorhabditis elegans.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
103,
1100-1105.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Inanobe,
H.Furukawa,
and
E.Gouaux
(2005).
Mechanism of partial agonist action at the NR1 subunit of NMDA receptors.
|
| |
Neuron,
47,
71-84.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
B.B.Nielsen,
D.S.Pickering,
J.R.Greenwood,
L.Brehm,
M.Gajhede,
A.Schousboe,
and
J.S.Kastrup
(2005).
Exploring the GluR2 ligand-binding core in complex with the bicyclical AMPA analogue (S)-4-AHCP.
|
| |
FEBS J,
272,
1639-1648.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.R.Madden
(2005).
New light on an open-and-shut case.
|
| |
Nat Chem Biol,
1,
317-319.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Rodriguez,
L.Carcache,
and
K.S.Rein
(2005).
Low-mode docking search in iGluR homology models implicates three residues in the control of ligand selectivity.
|
| |
J Mol Recognit,
18,
183-189.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.L.Mayer
(2005).
Crystal structures of the GluR5 and GluR6 ligand binding cores: molecular mechanisms underlying kainate receptor selectivity.
|
| |
Neuron,
45,
539-552.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.L.Mayer
(2005).
Glutamate receptor ion channels.
|
| |
Curr Opin Neurobiol,
15,
282-288.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.M.Holm,
M.L.Lunn,
S.F.Traynelis,
J.S.Kastrup,
and
J.Egebjerg
(2005).
Structural determinants of agonist-specific kinetics at the ionotropic glutamate receptor 2.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
102,
12053-12058.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Q.Cheng,
M.Du,
G.Ramanoudjame,
and
V.Jayaraman
(2005).
Evolution of glutamate interactions during binding to a glutamate receptor.
|
| |
Nat Chem Biol,
1,
329-332.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Balannik,
F.S.Menniti,
A.V.Paternain,
J.Lerma,
and
Y.Stern-Bach
(2005).
Molecular mechanism of AMPA receptor noncompetitive antagonism.
|
| |
Neuron,
48,
279-288.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Strømgaard,
and
I.Mellor
(2004).
AMPA receptor ligands: synthetic and pharmacological studies of polyamines and polyamine toxins.
|
| |
Med Res Rev,
24,
589-620.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Kubo,
and
E.Ito
(2004).
Structural dynamics of an ionotropic glutamate receptor.
|
| |
Proteins,
56,
411-419.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.S.Horning,
and
M.L.Mayer
(2004).
Regulation of AMPA receptor gating by ligand binding core dimers.
|
| |
Neuron,
41,
379-388.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |