 |
PDBsum entry 1ojv
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulator of complement pathway
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1ojv
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Complement regulation at the molecular level: the structure of decay-Accelerating factor.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
P.Lukacik,
P.Roversi,
J.White,
D.Esser,
G.P.Smith,
J.Billington,
P.A.Williams,
P.M.Rudd,
M.R.Wormald,
D.J.Harvey,
M.D.Crispin,
C.M.Radcliffe,
R.A.Dwek,
D.J.Evans,
B.P.Morgan,
R.A.Smith,
S.M.Lea.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2004,
101,
1279-1284.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
The human complement regulator CD55 is a key molecule protecting self-cells from
complement-mediated lysis. X-ray diffraction and analytical ultracentrifugation
data reveal a rod-like arrangement of four short consensus repeat (SCR) domains
in both the crystal and solution. The stalk linking the four SCR domains to the
glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor is extended by the addition of 11 highly
charged O-glycans and positions the domains an estimated 177 A above the
membrane. Mutation mapping and hydrophobic potential analysis suggest that the
interaction with the convertase, and thus complement regulation, depends on the
burial of a hydrophobic patch centered on the linker between SCR domains 2 and 3.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Structure of CD55. (a) Structure of the four SCR
domains (views at 0° and 90°). The molecule shown is
molecule A from crystal form A (see Table 2). The structure is
colored from blue at the N terminus to red at the C terminus.
All figures were drawn with AESOP (M. E. M. Noble, unpublished
program). (b) Comparison between eight copies of CD55[1234] from
three different crystal forms. The molecules are overlaid with
carbons from SCR domain
3 (residues 126-185) so that the lack of variation in the SCR
2/3 domain interface may be appreciated, and the molecules are
colored so that the two copies from crystal forms A and B are
red and green, respectively, and the four copies from crystal
form C are blue. (c) Full model for CD55 in the cell membrane.
This model combines the atomic coordinates for the SCR domains
with models for the N- and O-linked sugars and the GPI anchor,
built as described in the text. The molecule is embedded in a
lipid monolayer to allow the extension of the stalk that
supports the SCR domains above the membrane to be visualized.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Model of the complex between CD55 and the von
Willebrand factor type A domain (vWF-A) of factor B. b and d
show two views of the complex between CD55 and the vWF-A domain
of factor B generated as described in the text. CD55 is oriented
as in Fig. 1a Left. b shows a surface representation, and d
shows a secondary structure trace for both molecules, which are
colored as follows: CD55, the hydrophobic potential was
calculated by using the program GRID and mapped onto the surface
in AESOP (43) colored from green (most favorable for hydrophobic
probe interaction) via yellow to white; and vWF-A of factor B,
residues implicated in CD55 binding are colored red, and those
implicated in C3b binding are colored orange; positions where
mutation has no effect on CD55 sensitivity are colored blue. a
and c show each molecule rotated 90° away from the view
shown in b to allow inspection of the surfaces buried in the
interface. CD55 is shown in the same view as in that of Fig. 1a
Right.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Secondary reference #1
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Biological activity, Membrane-Targeting modification, And crystallization of soluble human decay accelerating factor expressed in e. Coli.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
J.White,
P.Lukacik,
D.Esser,
M.Steward,
N.Giddings,
J.R.Bright,
S.J.Fritchley,
B.P.Morgan,
S.M.Lea,
G.P.Smith,
R.A.Smith.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Protein Sci, 2004,
13,
2406-2415.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Summary of the domain structures and
modifications made to the DAF forms used in this study. For
definitions of the forms, see Abbreviations. Note that the exact
composition of the glycoform carbohydrate differs between nDAF
and PpDAF.
|
 |
Figure 7.
Figure 7. Effect of seeding on DAF crystal growth: (A)
crystals grown from an undiluted seeding stock, (B) 10-fold
diluted stock, (C) 100-fold diluted stock. The largest crystal
at center of insert (C) is 210 µm in the longest dimension.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reproduced from the cited reference
with permission from the Protein Society
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |