 |
PDBsum entry 1o6w
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nuclear protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1o6w
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Solution structure and ligand recognition of the ww domain pair of the yeast splicing factor prp40.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
S.Wiesner,
G.Stier,
M.Sattler,
M.J.Macias.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Mol Biol, 2002,
324,
807-822.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
The yeast splicing factor pre-mRNA processing protein 40 (Prp40) comprises two
N-terminal WW domains, separated by a ten-residue linker, and six consecutive FF
domains. In the spliceosome, the Prp40 WW domains participate in cross-intron
bridging by interacting with proline-rich regions present in the branch-point
binding protein (BBP) and the U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein component Prp8.
Furthermore, binding of Prp40 to the phosphorylated C-terminal domain (CTD) of
the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II is thought to link splicing to
transcription. To gain insight into this complex interaction network we have
determined the solution structure of the tandem Prp40 WW domains by NMR
spectroscopy and performed chemical shift mapping experiments with different
proline-rich peptides. The WW domains each adopt the characteristic
triple-stranded beta-sheet structure and are connected by a stable alpha-helical
linker. On the basis of a detailed analysis of residual dipolar couplings (RDC)
and 15N relaxation data we show that the tandem Prp40 WW domains behave in
solution as a single folded unit with unique alignment and diffusion tensor,
respectively. Using [1H-15N]-RDCs, we were able to accurately define the
relative orientation of the WW domains revealing that the binding pockets of
each domain face opposite sides of the structure. Furthermore, we found that
both Prp40 WW domains interact with PPxY motifs (where x is any residue) present
in peptides derived from the splicing factors BBP and Prp8. Moreover, the Prp40
WW domains are shown to bind proline-rich peptides devoid of aromatic residues,
which are also recognised by the Abl-SH3 domain and the WW domain of the
mammalian Prp40 orthologue formin binding protein 11. In contrast, no
interaction was observed between the Prp40 WW domains and the CTD repeats used
in this work.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Superposition of representative regions of the
1H, 15N correlation spectra for the interaction of the Prp40
tandem WW domains and the second Rsp5 WW domain with different
proline-rich peptides. The free WW domains are shown in black
(reference spectra without ligand). In (a)-(c), G* corresponds
to a glycine residue resulting from the TEV protease cleavage
site (see Materials and Methods). (a) Addition of PPxY/F motif
containing peptides from BBP Image in green) and Prp8 Image in
blue and Image in red) to the Prp40 tandem WW domains. (b)
Addition of PPQQP motif containing peptides from mouse formin
Image in blue) and the Abl-SH3 3BP-10 peptide Image in red) to
the Prp40 tandem WW domains. (c) Addition of Prp8 peptide
(PPPPSNFE in green), the unphosphorylated tandem CTD repeat
(YSPTSPSYSPTSPS in blue) and the doubly phosphorylated CTD
repeat (SYpSPTpSPS in red) to the Prp40 tandem WW domains. (d)
Addition of the unphosphorylated tandem CTD repeat
(YSPTSPSYSPTSPS in red) and the doubly phosphorylated CTD repeat
(SYpSPTpSPS in cyan) to the second WW domain of Rsp5. All
peptide/protein ratios refer to the WW domain pair for Prp40 and
to the single domain for Rsp5.
|
 |
Figure 7.
Figure 7. Intermolecular NOEs observed in the Prp40
WW2-PSPPPVYDA complex. The Figure is based on a schematic
representation of the interaction produced using the program
LIGPLOT[57.] and a model of the Prp40 WW2-PSPPPVYDA complex.
Residues exhibiting inter-molecular NOEs (broken lines) are
shown in grey for the Prp40 WW2 and in green for the BBP
peptide. For reasons of clarity, protons have been removed from
the illustration, but proton-proton NOEs are implied. Where NOEs
involved diastereotopic protons degenerate in their chemical
shifts, only one of the possible interactions is shown.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2002,
324,
807-822)
copyright 2002.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |