 |
PDBsum entry 1o3r
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gene regulation/DNA
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1o3r
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
314:63-74
(2001)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Indirect readout of DNA sequence at the primary-kink site in the CAP-DNA complex: DNA binding specificity based on energetics of DNA kinking.
|
|
S.Chen,
J.Vojtechovsky,
G.N.Parkinson,
R.H.Ebright,
H.M.Berman.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The catabolite activator protein (CAP) makes no direct contact with the
consensus base-pair T:A at position 6 of the DNA half-site
5'-A(1)A(2)A(3)T(4)G(5)T(6)G(7)A(8)T(9)C(10)T(11)-3' but, nevertheless, exhibits
strong specificity for T:A at position 6. Binding of CAP results in formation of
a sharp DNA kink, with a roll angle of approximately 40 degrees and a twist
angle of approximately 20 degrees, between positions 6 and 7 of the DNA
half-site. The consensus base-pair T:A at position 6 and the consensus base-pair
G:C at position 7 form a T:A/G:C step, which is known to be associated with DNA
flexibility. It has been proposed that specificity for T:A at position 6 is a
consequence of formation of the DNA kink between positions 6 and 7, and of
effects of the T:A(6)/G:C(7) step on the geometry of DNA kinking, or the
energetics of DNA kinking. In this work, we determine crystallographic
structures of CAP-DNA complexes having the consensus base-pair T:A at position 6
or the non-consensus base-pair C:G at position 6. We show that complexes
containing T:A or C:G at position 6 exhibit similar overall DNA bend angles and
local geometries of DNA kinking. We infer that indirect readout in this system
does not involve differences in the geometry of DNA kinking but, rather, solely
differences in the energetics of DNA kinking. We further infer that the main
determinant of DNA conformation in this system is protein-DNA interaction, and
not DNA sequence.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. CAP-DNA complexes having and not having the
T:A/G:C base-pair step at the primary-kink site. (a) DNA
fragments used for crystallization in space group C222[1]. (b)
Least-squares superimposition of structures of CAP-DNA (cyan)
and CAP-[6C;17G]DNA (yellow; position 6 of each DNA half-site in
red) complexes in space group C222[1]. (c) DNA fragments used
for crystallization in space group P3[1]21. (d) Least-squares
superimposition of structures of CAP-DNA (blue) and
CAP-[6C;17G]DNA (green; position 6 of each DNA half-site in red)
complexes in space group P3[1]21. In (a) and (c) the positions
of the nicks in the DNA are shown as vertical bars. The o
indicates the position of the 2-fold symmetry axis in the
sequence. In (b) and (d), CAP is shown in a ribbon
representation, and bound cAMP. One molecule per CAP subunit in
space group C222[1][13, 14 and 15]; two molecules per CAP
subunit in space group P3[1]21. The same positions and the same
number of molecules of cAMP were seen in another CAP-DNA complex
in a trigonal space group[28]. (b) and (d) were generated using
MOLSCRIPT [45].
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Details of CAP-DNA interactions in complexes
having and not having the T:A/G:C base-pair step at the
primary-kink site. Panels illustrate the second a-helix of the
helix-turn-helix motif of CAP (recognition helix) and positions
4 to 8 of the DNA half-site. For reference, the primary-kink is
located between position 6 and 7 of the DNA half-site. (a)
CAP-DNA (top), CAP-[6C;17G]DNA (middle) and superimposed CAP-DNA
and CAP-[6C;17G]DNA (bottom; colors as in Figure 1) complexes in
space group C222[1] (half-complex A). (b) CAP-DNA (top),
CAP-[6C;17G]DNA (middle) and superimposed CAP-DNA and
CAP-[6C;17G]DNA (bottom; colors as in Figure 1) complexes in
space group C222[1] (half-complex B). (c) CAP-DNA (top),
CAP-[6C;17G]DNA (middle) and superimposed CAP-DNA and
CAP-[6C;17G]DNA (bottom; colors as in Figure 1) complexes in
space group P3[1]21. Stereodiagrams were generated using
MOLSCRIPT[45]. The cutoff distance used for defining hydrogen
bonds (violet broken lines) was 3.5 Å.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2001,
314,
63-74)
copyright 2001.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.Marathe,
and
M.Bansal
(2011).
An ensemble of B-DNA dinucleotide geometries lead to characteristic nucleosomal DNA structure and provide plasticity required for gene expression.
|
| |
BMC Struct Biol,
11,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.S.Mitchell,
C.A.Laughton,
and
S.A.Harris
(2011).
Atomistic simulations reveal bubbles, kinks and wrinkles in supercoiled DNA.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
39,
3928-3938.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Lindemose,
P.E.Nielsen,
and
N.E.Møllegaard
(2008).
Dissecting direct and indirect readout of cAMP receptor protein DNA binding using an inosine and 2,6-diaminopurine in vitro selection system.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
36,
4797-4807.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Koyanagi,
T.Katayama,
H.Suzuki,
and
H.Kumagai
(2008).
Altered oligomerization properties of N316 mutants of Escherichia coli TyrR.
|
| |
J Bacteriol,
190,
8238-8243.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.J.Lu,
and
W.K.Olson
(2008).
3DNA: a versatile, integrated software system for the analysis, rebuilding and visualization of three-dimensional nucleic-acid structures.
|
| |
Nat Protoc,
3,
1213-1227.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Tutar
(2008).
Syn, anti, and finally both conformations of cyclic AMP are involved in the CRP-dependent transcription initiation mechanism in E. coli lac operon.
|
| |
Cell Biochem Funct,
26,
399-405.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Cava,
O.Laptenko,
S.Borukhov,
Z.Chahlafi,
E.Blas-Galindo,
P.Gómez-Puertas,
and
J.Berenguer
(2007).
Control of the respiratory metabolism of Thermus thermophilus by the nitrate respiration conjugative element NCE.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol,
64,
630-646.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Das,
and
G.Melacini
(2007).
A model for agonism and antagonism in an ancient and ubiquitous cAMP-binding domain.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
282,
581-593.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Das,
V.Esposito,
M.Abu-Abed,
G.S.Anand,
S.S.Taylor,
and
G.Melacini
(2007).
cAMP activation of PKA defines an ancient signaling mechanism.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
104,
93-98.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.A.Napoli,
C.L.Lawson,
R.H.Ebright,
and
H.M.Berman
(2006).
Indirect readout of DNA sequence at the primary-kink site in the CAP-DNA complex: recognition of pyrimidine-purine and purine-purine steps.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
357,
173-183.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.D.Cameron,
and
R.J.Redfield
(2006).
Non-canonical CRP sites control competence regulons in Escherichia coli and many other gamma-proteobacteria.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
34,
6001-6014.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Fukuzawa,
Y.Komeiji,
Y.Mochizuki,
A.Kato,
T.Nakano,
and
S.Tanaka
(2006).
Intra- and intermolecular interactions between cyclic-AMP receptor protein and DNA: ab initio fragment molecular orbital study.
|
| |
J Comput Chem,
27,
948-960.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Tworzydło,
A.Polit,
J.Mikołajczak,
and
Z.Wasylewski
(2005).
Fluorescence quenching and kinetic studies of conformational changes induced by DNA and cAMP binding to cAMP receptor protein from Escherichia coli.
|
| |
FEBS J,
272,
1103-1116.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.B.Dixit,
D.Q.Andrews,
and
D.L.Beveridge
(2005).
Induced fit and the entropy of structural adaptation in the complexation of CAP and lambda-repressor with cognate DNA sequences.
|
| |
Biophys J,
88,
3147-3157.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Höglund,
and
O.Kohlbacher
(2004).
From sequence to structure and back again: approaches for predicting protein-DNA binding.
|
| |
Proteome Sci,
2,
3.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.L.Lawson,
D.Swigon,
K.S.Murakami,
S.A.Darst,
H.M.Berman,
and
R.H.Ebright
(2004).
Catabolite activator protein: DNA binding and transcription activation.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
14,
10-20.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.A.Gollmick,
M.Lorenz,
U.Dornberger,
J.von Langen,
S.Diekmann,
and
H.Fritzsche
(2002).
Solution structure of dAATAA and dAAUAA DNA bulges.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
30,
2669-2677.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.M.Thayer,
and
D.L.Beveridge
(2002).
Hidden Markov models from molecular dynamics simulations on DNA.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
99,
8642-8647.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.R.Hardwidge,
J.M.Zimmerman,
and
L.J.Maher
(2002).
Charge neutralization and DNA bending by the Escherichia coli catabolite activator protein.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
30,
1879-1885.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |