 |
PDBsum entry 1nyp
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell adhesion
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1nyp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Nat Struct Biol
10:558-564
(2003)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural and functional insights into PINCH LIM4 domain-mediated integrin signaling.
|
|
A.Velyvis,
J.Vaynberg,
Y.Yang,
O.Vinogradova,
Y.Zhang,
C.Wu,
J.Qin.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
PINCH is an adaptor protein found in focal adhesions, large cellular complexes
that link extracellular matrix to the actin cytoskeleton. PINCH, which contains
an array of five LIM domains, has been implicated as a platform for multiple
protein-protein interactions that mediate integrin signaling within focal
adhesions. We had previously characterized the LIM1 domain of PINCH, which
functions in focal adhesions by binding specifically to integrin-linked kinase.
Using NMR spectroscopy, we show here that the PINCH LIM4 domain, while
maintaining the conserved LIM scaffold, recognizes the third SH3 domain of
another adaptor protein, Nck2 (also called Nckbeta or Grb4), in a manner
distinct from that of the LIM1 domain. Point mutation of LIM residues in the
SH3-binding interface disrupted LIM-SH3 interaction and substantially impaired
localization of PINCH to focal adhesions. These data provide novel structural
insight into LIM domain-mediated protein-protein recognition and demonstrate
that the PINCH-Nck2 interaction is an important component of the focal adhesion
assembly during integrin signaling.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Structural properties of LIM4 and its sequence and
structural comparisons with other LIM domains. (a) Primary
sequence comparison of PINCH LIM domains. Residues in LIM1 and
LIM4 that are perturbed in HSQC spectra of free versus bound
protein (>100 Hz in LIM1 and >10 Hz in LIM4) are highlighted in
green. Zinc-coordinating residues are shown in red. Symbols at
the top indicate secondary structure elements in LIM4. (b)
Stereo view of best-fit superposition of 20 structures of LIM4
with the least NOE violations. (c) Zn2+ coordination. In the
top, Cys193, Cys196, His213 and His216 coordinate Zn2+ in the
N-terminal finger. In the bottom, Cys219, Cys222, Cys240 and
His243 coordinate Zn2+ in the C-terminal finger. (d) C 2
planes for His213, His216 and His243 (left to right) in 3D
15N,13C-edited NOESY spectrum showing NOE peaks (labels at
right) of imidazole ring H 2
atoms that unambiguously establish ring orientations for
Zn2+-coordinating histidines. (e) Best-fit superposition of
minimized average LIM4 (blue) with CRIP (red), showing the
relative twist between N- and C-terminal Zn-fingers in CRIP and
absence thereof in LIM4. Red spheres represent Zn2+ ions in
LIM4. The orientation is a 90° rotation about vertical axis
compared with b.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. R197A-R198A double mutation reduces the efficiency of
PINCH localization to focal adhesions. ILK binding as
analyzed by western blotting with (a) HRP-conjugated anti-GFP
and (b) mouse monoclonal anti-ILK 65.1. Lysates (8 g
per lane) of C2C12 cells expressing GFP-FLAG -tagged PINCH, the
GFP-FLAG -tagged PINCH mutant with the R197A-R198A mutation
(PINCHm) or GFP alone (control) were mixed with rabbit
polyclonal antibodies to GFP (Clontech) and then
immunoprecipitated as indicated. (c -f) Subcellular
localization. C2C12 cells expressing GFP-FLAG-PINCHm (c and d)
or GFP-FLAG-PINCH (e and f) were plated on fibronectin-coated
coverslips and stained with mouse monoclonal antibody to
paxillin (a marker of focal adhesions; clone 349, Transduction
Laboratories) and rhodamine-conjugated anti-mouse IgG.
GFP-FLAG-PINCHm (c), GFP-FLAG-PINCH (e) and paxillin (d and f)
were visualized under a fluorescence microscope equipped with
GFP (c and e) and rhodamine (d and f) filters. Bar, 10 m.
Although the GFP-FLAG-PINCH mutant and GFP-FLAG-PINCH proteins
bind to ILK equally well, the GFP-FLAG-PINCH mutant localized to
focal adhesions much less efficiently than GFP-FLAG-PINCH.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nat Struct Biol
(2003,
10,
558-564)
copyright 2003.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.J.Rowe
(2011).
Ultra-weak reversible protein-protein interactions.
|
| |
Methods,
54,
157-166.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Kovalevich,
B.Tracy,
and
D.Langford
(2011).
PINCH: More than just an adaptor protein in cellular response.
|
| |
J Cell Physiol,
226,
940-947.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Bieri,
A.H.Kwan,
M.Mobli,
G.F.King,
J.P.Mackay,
and
P.R.Gooley
(2011).
Macromolecular NMR spectroscopy for the non-spectroscopist: beyond macromolecular solution structure determination.
|
| |
FEBS J,
278,
704-715.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.Eke,
S.Hehlgans,
and
N.Cordes
(2009).
There's something about ILK.
|
| |
Int J Radiat Biol,
85,
929-936.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Qi,
H.K.Dhiman,
N.Bhola,
I.Budyak,
S.Kar,
D.Man,
A.Dutta,
K.Tirupula,
B.I.Carr,
J.Grandis,
Z.Bar-Joseph,
and
J.Klein-Seetharaman
(2009).
Systematic prediction of human membrane receptor interactions.
|
| |
Proteomics,
9,
5243-5255.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.P.Chiswell,
R.Zhang,
J.W.Murphy,
T.J.Boggon,
and
D.A.Calderwood
(2008).
The structural basis of integrin-linked kinase-PINCH interactions.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
20677-20682.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Wang,
K.Fukuda,
I.J.Byeon,
A.Velyvis,
C.Wu,
A.Gronenborn,
and
J.Qin
(2008).
The structure of alpha-parvin CH2-paxillin LD1 complex reveals a novel modular recognition for focal adhesion assembly.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
21113-21119.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Ababou,
M.Gautel,
and
M.Pfuhl
(2007).
Dissecting the N-terminal myosin binding site of human cardiac myosin-binding protein C. Structure and myosin binding of domain C2.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
282,
9204-9215.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Hehlgans,
M.Haase,
and
N.Cordes
(2007).
Signalling via integrins: implications for cell survival and anticancer strategies.
|
| |
Biochim Biophys Acta,
1775,
163-180.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.J.Martinsen,
A.N.Neumann,
A.J.Frasier,
C.V.Baker,
C.E.Krull,
and
J.L.Lohr
(2006).
PINCH-1 expression during early avian embryogenesis: implications for neural crest and heart development.
|
| |
Dev Dyn,
235,
152-162.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.W.Liew,
K.D.Rand,
R.J.Simpson,
W.W.Yung,
R.E.Mansfield,
M.Crossley,
M.Proetorius-Ibba,
C.Nerlov,
F.M.Poulsen,
and
J.P.Mackay
(2006).
Molecular analysis of the interaction between the hematopoietic master transcription factors GATA-1 and PU.1.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
281,
28296-28306.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Vaynberg,
and
J.Qin
(2006).
Weak protein-protein interactions as probed by NMR spectroscopy.
|
| |
Trends Biotechnol,
24,
22-27.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Li,
G.A.Peters,
K.Ding,
X.Zhang,
J.Qin,
and
G.C.Sen
(2006).
Molecular basis for PKR activation by PACT or dsRNA.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
103,
10005-10010.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Xu,
X.Wang,
J.Yang,
J.Vaynberg,
and
J.Qin
(2006).
PASA--a program for automated protein NMR backbone signal assignment by pattern-filtering approach.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
34,
41-56.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Xu,
T.Fukuda,
Y.Li,
X.Zha,
J.Qin,
and
C.Wu
(2005).
Molecular dissection of PINCH-1 reveals a mechanism of coupling and uncoupling of cell shape modulation and survival.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
280,
27631-27637.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Grashoff,
I.Thievessen,
K.Lorenz,
S.Ussar,
and
R.Fässler
(2004).
Integrin-linked kinase: integrin's mysterious partner.
|
| |
Curr Opin Cell Biol,
16,
565-571.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.E.Deane,
D.P.Ryan,
M.Sunde,
M.J.Maher,
J.M.Guss,
J.E.Visvader,
and
J.M.Matthews
(2004).
Tandem LIM domains provide synergistic binding in the LMO4:Ldb1 complex.
|
| |
EMBO J,
23,
3589-3598.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.L.Kadrmas,
and
M.C.Beckerle
(2004).
The LIM domain: from the cytoskeleton to the nucleus.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
5,
920-931.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.B.Russell,
F.Alber,
P.Aloy,
F.P.Davis,
D.Korkin,
M.Pichaud,
M.Topf,
and
A.Sali
(2004).
A structural perspective on protein-protein interactions.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
14,
313-324.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |