spacer
spacer
Go to PDB code: 
protein ligands Protein-protein interface(s) links
Hormone/growth factor/membrane protein PDB-id
1nun
Asymmetric unit
Main view
    Jmol     Help!  
Contents
Description
Header details
Header records
References
PROCHECK
Protein chains
139 a.a. *
209 a.a. *
Ligands
SO4 ×2
15P
Waters ×25

* Residue conservation analysis
Tools
Image Generation
AstexViewer™@PDBe
Run PROCHECK
Clefts Calculation
  
  Biological unit*, tetramer
(*as deduced by PQS)
PDB id: 1nun
Name: Hormone/growth factor/membrane protein
Title: Crystal structure analysis of the fgf10-fgfr2b complex

Structure:
Fibroblast growth factor-10. Chain: a. Synonym: fgf-10, keratinocyte growth factor receptor, k- sam protein, protein tyrosine kinase, receptor like 14, fgf receptor, bacteria-expressed kinase, fibroblast growth factor receptor bek, tyrosylprotein kinase, hydroxyaryl- protein kinase. Engineered: yes. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 isoform 2.

Source:
Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: fgf10. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21. Expression_system_taxid: 511693.

Biological unit:
Tetramer (from PQS)

UniProt:
Chain A: O15520 (FGF10_HUMAN)
Pfam  
Seq: 208 a.a.
Struc: 139 a.a.

Chain B: P21802 (FGFR2_HUMAN)
Pfam  
Seq:
Struc:
Seq:
Struc:
Seq:
Struc:
Seq: 821 a.a.
Struc: 209 a.a.*
Key:    PfamA domain  PfamB domain
 Secondary structure  CATH domain
* PDB and UniProt seqs differ at 22 residue positions (black crosses)

Enzyme class:
Chain B: E.C.2.7.10.1   [IntEnz]   [ExPASy]   [KEGG]   [BRENDA]

Reaction:
ATP + a [protein]-L-tyrosine = ADP + a [protein]-L-tyrosine phosphate

Resolution:
2.90Å

R-factor:
0.239

R-free:
0.288

Authors:
B.K.Yeh,M.Igarashi,A.V.Eliseenkova,A.N.Plotnikov,I.Sher, D.Ron,S.A.Aaronson,M.Mohammadi

Key ref:
B.K.Yeh et al. (2003). Structural basis by which alternative splicing confers specificity in fibroblast growth factor receptors.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100, 2266-2271. [PubMed id: 12591959] [DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0436500100]

Date:
31-Jan-03

Release date:
11-Feb-03
Quick_links
RCSB
PDBe
SRS
MMDB
JenaLib
OCA
Proteopedia
CATH
SCOP
FSSP
HSSP
PDBSWS
PQS
PROCOGNATE
ProSAT
Whatcheck
Procheck
Go to PROCHECK summary
Clefts
Clefts
Surface
RasMol surface
spacer
spacer

 
    Key reference    
 
 
DOI no: 10.1073/pnas.0436500100 Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:2266-2271 (2003)
PubMed id: 12591959  
 
 
Structural basis by which alternative splicing confers specificity in fibroblast growth factor receptors.
B.K.Yeh, M.Igarashi, A.V.Eliseenkova, A.N.Plotnikov, I.Sher, D.Ron, S.A.Aaronson, M.Mohammadi.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
Binding specificity between fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and their receptors (FGFRs) is essential for mammalian development and is regulated primarily by two alternatively spliced exons, IIIb ("b") and IIIc ("c"), that encode the second half of Ig-like domain 3 (D3) of FGFRs. FGF7 and FGF10 activate only the b isoform of FGFR2 (FGFR2b). Here, we report the crystal structure of the ligand-binding portion of FGFR2b bound to FGF10. Unique contacts between divergent regions in FGF10 and two b-specific loops in D3 reveal the structural basis by which alternative splicing provides FGF10-FGFR2b specificity. Structure-based mutagenesis of FGF10 confirms the importance of the observed contacts for FGF10 biological activity. Interestingly, FGF10 binding induces a previously unobserved rotation of receptor Ig domain 2 (D2) to introduce specific contacts with FGF10. Hence, both D2 and D3 of FGFR2b contribute to the exceptional specificity between FGF10 and FGFR2b. We propose that ligand-induced conformational change in FGFRs may also play an important role in determining specificity for other FGF-FGFR complexes.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 5.
Fig. 5. FGF10-induced D2 rotation contributes to FGF10-FGFR2b specificity. (a) Relationship between the D2 domains after superimposition of FGF10 and FGF2 from the FGF10-FGFR2b and FGF2-FGFR2c structures. For the sake of clarity, D3 and the linker region are not shown. The direction and degree of rotation between the two domains is shown. D2 of FGFR2b is colored blue. D2 of FGFR2c is colored gray. The A' strands of both domains are shown as -strand arrows. The remainders of the domains are displayed as C coils. FGF10 is shown in orange. (b) Interactions at the FGF10-D2 interface. The side chains of interacting residues are displayed. (Right) A view of the FGF10-FGFR2b complex, with the region of interest indicated by a square. FGF10 and FGFR2b are colored as in Fig. 1. Oxygen atoms are colored red, nitrogen blue, and carbon atoms the same color as the molecules to which they belong.
Figure 6.
Fig. 6. Conformation of the FGFR2b linker region. (a) Interactions of the FGFR-invariant linker Arg-251 with FGF10. The side chains of interacting residues are displayed. (Right) A view of the whole FGF10-FGFR2b structure, with the region of interest indicated by a square. FGF10 and FGFR2b are colored as in Fig. 1. Oxygen atoms are colored red, nitrogen blue, and carbon atoms the same color as the molecules to which they belong. (b) Configuration of the FGFR-invariant linker Pro-253 in the FGF10-FGFR2b and FGF1-FGFR2c-heparin structures. The equivalent D2s from the FGF10-FGFR2b and FGF1-FGFR2c-heparin structures are superimposed (rmsd = 0.652 Å). FGFR2b is colored yellow, and FGFR2c is colored blue. The location of the linker prolines are indicated by arrows. Note the dramatic difference in the position of D3 between the two structures. (c) A FGF10-FGFR2b model with Pro-253 in the cis conformation. This model was generated by separately superimposing FGF10 and FGFR2b-D3 from the FGF10-FGFR2b structure onto FGF1 and FGFR2c-D3 in the FGF1-FGFR2c-heparin structure (rmsd = 0.791 Å and 0.668 Å, respectively). D2 and D3 are shown in green and blue, respectively. The alternatively spliced half of D3 is colored purple. FGF1 is displayed as a black C coil, and FGF10 is displayed as a thicker orange coil. FGF10 regions that interact with D3 in the FGF10-FGFR2b structure are colored red. In addition, FGF10 residues whose mutations reduce the ability of FGF10 to activate FGFR2b are rendered in ball-and-stick. The N and C termini of the receptor are labeled NT and CT, respectively.
 
  Figures were selected by the author.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
19225542 B.C.Melnik, G.Schmitz, and C.C.Zouboulis (2009).
Anti-acne agents attenuate FGFR2 signal transduction in acne.
  J Invest Dermatol, 129, 1868-1877.  
19224135 J.Wang, X.Cai, M.Zou, T.Xu, S.Liu, Y.Wang, J.Wang, and D.Xu (2009).
Construction and characterization of a high activity mutant of human keratinocyte growth factor-2.
  Biotechnol Lett, 31, 797-802.  
19185025 N.Kulahin, S.Li, V.Kiselyov, E.Bock, and V.Berezin (2009).
Identification of neural cell adhesion molecule L1-derived neuritogenic ligands of the fibroblast growth factor receptor.
  J Neurosci Res, 87, 1806-1812.  
19634127 S.Li, C.Christensen, L.B.Køhler, V.V.Kiselyov, V.Berezin, and E.Bock (2009).
Agonists of fibroblast growth factor receptor induce neurite outgrowth and survival of cerebellar granule neurons.
  Dev Neurobiol, 69, 837-854.  
19544582 Y.Yaguchi, T.Yu, M.U.Ahmed, M.Berry, I.Mason, and M.A.Basson (2009).
Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) gene expression in the developing cerebellum suggests multiple roles for FGF signaling during cerebellar morphogenesis and development.
  Dev Dyn, 238, 2058-2072.  
18478591 R.Menezes, A.Letra, J.Ruff, J.M.Granjeiro, and A.R.Vieira (2008).
Studies of genes in the FGF signaling pathway and oral clefts with or without dental anomalies.
  Am J Med Genet A, 146, 1614-1617.  
18523850 S.Oltean, P.G.Febbo, and M.A.Garcia-Blanco (2008).
Dunning rat prostate adenocarcinomas and alternative splicing reporters: powerful tools to study epithelial plasticity in prostate tumors in vivo.
  Clin Exp Metastasis, 25, 611-619.  
18230614 V.N.Patel, K.M.Likar, S.Zisman-Rozen, S.N.Cowherd, K.S.Lassiter, I.Sher, E.A.Yates, J.E.Turnbull, D.Ron, and M.P.Hoffman (2008).
Specific heparan sulfate structures modulate FGF10-mediated submandibular gland epithelial morphogenesis and differentiation.
  J Biol Chem, 283, 9308-9317.  
17682060 I.Shams, E.Rohmann, V.P.Eswarakumar, E.D.Lew, S.Yuzawa, B.Wollnik, J.Schlessinger, and I.Lax (2007).
Lacrimo-auriculo-dento-digital syndrome is caused by reduced activity of the fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF10)-FGF receptor 2 signaling pathway.
  Mol Cell Biol, 27, 6903-6912.  
17471512 J.Kosman, N.Carmean, E.M.Leaf, K.Dyamenahalli, and J.A.Bassuk (2007).
Translocation of fibroblast growth factor-10 and its receptor into nuclei of human urothelial cells.
  J Cell Biochem, 102, 769-785.  
17213838 M.Entesarian, J.Dahlqvist, V.Shashi, C.S.Stanley, B.Falahat, W.Reardon, and N.Dahl (2007).
FGF10 missense mutations in aplasia of lacrimal and salivary glands (ALSG).
  Eur J Hum Genet, 15, 379-382.  
17339340 R.Goetz, A.Beenken, O.A.Ibrahimi, J.Kalinina, S.K.Olsen, A.V.Eliseenkova, C.Xu, T.A.Neubert, F.Zhang, R.J.Linhardt, X.Yu, K.E.White, T.Inagaki, S.A.Kliewer, M.Yamamoto, H.Kurosu, Y.Ogawa, M.Kuro-o, B.Lanske, M.S.Razzaque, and M.Mohammadi (2007).
Molecular insights into the klotho-dependent, endocrine mode of action of fibroblast growth factor 19 subfamily members.
  Mol Cell Biol, 27, 3417-3428.
PDB codes: 2p23 2p39
17468828 Y.Tatekawa, H.Kanehiro, and Y.Nakajima (2007).
Duodenal atresia associated with "apple peel" small bowel without deletion of fibroblast growth factor-10 or fibroblast growth factor receptor 2IIIb: report of a case.
  Surg Today, 37, 430-433.  
16879338 D.J.Housley, and P.J.Venta (2006).
The long and the short of it: evidence that FGF5 is a major determinant of canine 'hair'-itability.
  Anim Genet, 37, 309-315.  
16838370 E.Cox, J.Lanier, L.Quina, S.R.Eng, and E.E.Turner (2006).
Regulation of FGF10 by POU transcription factor Brn3a in the developing trigeminal ganglion.
  J Neurobiol, 66, 1075-1083.  
16496021 P.Aloy, and R.B.Russell (2006).
Structural systems biology: modelling protein interactions.
  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 7, 188-197.  
16796457 P.Wei, J.Zhan, S.Liu, D.Chang, R.Haldankar, K.Burkhardt, J.Crouse, J.Hui, T.Juan, J.Talvenheimo, H.Kim, L.Li, T.Boone, and L.Borges (2006).
Generation and characterization of monoclonal antibodies to human keratinocyte growth factor receptor.
  Hybridoma (Larchmt), 25, 115-124.  
16384934 S.K.Olsen, J.Y.Li, C.Bromleigh, A.V.Eliseenkova, O.A.Ibrahimi, Z.Lao, F.Zhang, R.J.Linhardt, A.L.Joyner, and M.Mohammadi (2006).
Structural basis by which alternative splicing modulates the organizer activity of FGF8 in the brain.
  Genes Dev, 20, 185-198.
PDB code: 2fdb
15654336 M.Entesarian, H.Matsson, J.Klar, B.Bergendal, L.Olson, R.Arakaki, Y.Hayashi, H.Ohuchi, B.Falahat, A.I.Bolstad, R.Jonsson, M.Wahren-Herlenius, and N.Dahl (2005).
Mutations in the gene encoding fibroblast growth factor 10 are associated with aplasia of lacrimal and salivary glands.
  Nat Genet, 37, 125-127.  
15854058 N.Nagy, G.Szolnoky, G.Szabad, Z.Bata-Csörgo, A.Dobozy, L.Kemeny, and M.Szell (2005).
Single nucleotide polymorphisms of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene in patients with chronic venous insufficiency with leg ulcer.
  J Invest Dermatol, 124, 1085-1088.  
15632068 O.A.Ibrahimi, B.K.Yeh, A.V.Eliseenkova, F.Zhang, S.K.Olsen, M.Igarashi, S.A.Aaronson, R.J.Linhardt, and M.Mohammadi (2005).
Analysis of mutations in fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and a pathogenic mutation in FGF receptor (FGFR) provides direct evidence for the symmetric two-end model for FGFR dimerization.
  Mol Cell Biol, 25, 671-684.  
15382229 M.J.Bernett, T.Somasundaram, and M.Blaber (2004).
An atomic resolution structure for human fibroblast growth factor 1.
  Proteins, 57, 626-634.
PDB code: 1rg8
14732692 S.K.Olsen, O.A.Ibrahimi, A.Raucci, F.Zhang, A.V.Eliseenkova, A.Yayon, C.Basilico, R.J.Linhardt, J.Schlessinger, and M.Mohammadi (2004).
Insights into the molecular basis for fibroblast growth factor receptor autoinhibition and ligand-binding promiscuity.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101, 935-940.
PDB code: 1ry7
14610064 B.L.Allen, and A.C.Rapraeger (2003).
Spatial and temporal expression of heparan sulfate in mouse development regulates FGF and FGF receptor assembly.
  J Cell Biol, 163, 637-648.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB codes are shown on the right.