 |
PDBsum entry 1nfh
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gene regulation
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1nfh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Structure of a sir2 substrate, Alba, Reveals a mechanism for deacetylation-Induced enhancement of DNA binding.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
K.Zhao,
X.Chai,
R.Marmorstein.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Biol Chem, 2003,
278,
26071-26077.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
The targeted acetylation status of histones and several other transcriptional
regulatory proteins plays an important role in gene expression, although the
mechanism for this is not well understood. As a model to understand how targeted
acetylation may effect transcription, we determined the x-ray crystal structure
of the chromatin protein Alba from Archaeoglobus fulgidus, a substrate for the
Sir2 protein that deacetylates it at lysine 11 to promote DNA binding by Alba.
The structure reveals a dimer of dimers in which the dimer-dimer interface is
stabilized by several conserved hydrophobic residues as well as the lysine 11
target of Sir2. We show that, in solution, the mutation of these hydrophobic
residues or lysine 11 disrupts dimer-dimer formation and decreases DNA-binding
affinity. We propose that the in vivo deacetylation of lysine 11 of archaeal
Alba by Sir2 promotes protein oligomerization for optimal DNA binding.
Implications for the mechanism by which histone acetylation modulates gene
expression are discussed.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
FIG. 1. Structure of Af-Alba. Structure of the Alba monomer
(a), dimer (b), and tetramer (c) in the crystals.
|
 |
Figure 5.
FIG. 5. Model for DNA binding by Alba. a, model for how the
Af-Alba tetramer binds DNA. b, electrostatic surface of the
Af-Alba tetramer modeled on DNA. Blue, red, and white represent
the degree of electropositive, electronegative, and neutral
surface potential, respectively.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2003,
278,
26071-26077)
copyright 2003.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |