 |
PDBsum entry 1n3y
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell adhesion
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1n3y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
100:1873-1878
(2003)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structure and allosteric regulation of the alpha X beta 2 integrin I domain.
|
|
T.Vorup-Jensen,
C.Ostermeier,
M.Shimaoka,
U.Hommel,
T.A.Springer.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The integrin alpha X beta 2 (CD11c/CD18, p150,95) binds ligands through the I
domain of the alpha X subunit. Ligands include the complement factor fragment
iC3b, a key component in the innate immune defense, which, together with the
expression of alpha X beta 2 on dendritic cells and on other leukocytes,
suggests a role in the immune response. We now report the structure of the alpha
X I domain resolved at 1.65 A by x-ray crystallography. To analyze structural
requirements for ligand binding we made a mutation in the alpha X I domain
C-terminal helix, which increased the affinity for iC3b approximately 200-fold
to 2.4 microM compared with the wild-type domain affinity of approximately 400
microM. Gel permeation chromatography supported a conformational change between
the wild-type and mutated domains. Conservation of allosteric regulation in the
alpha X I domain points to the functional importance of this phenomenon.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. The X I domain
structure and comparison to the M I domain.
(A-D) Comparison of X (cyan)
and the M (magenta)
I domains. The MIDAS metal ion present only in M is shown
as a magenta sphere, and the water molecule oxygen present only
in the X MIDAS is
shown as a cyan sphere. (A) Backbones of X and M. (B)
MIDAS region of the X and M I
domains. Residue numbers refer to the X sequence.
(C) Residues in proximity of the X and M MIDAS,
which form part of a putative ligand-binding interface and
differ in structure or polarity between the two I domains ( X and M residues
are labeled in roman and italics, respectively). (D) Detail of
the region forming the hydrophobic socket for Ile-314 ( X) or
Ile-316 ( M). Residue
numbers refer to the X sequence,
and Leu-164 of M is
labeled in italics. All figures were made with RIBBONS software
(41). (E and F) Electrostatic surfaces of the M and X I
domains. The molecular surfaces of the domains were constructed
with GRASP (42). The electrostatic potentials were calculated
with the Delphi algorithm (43) and mapped onto the molecular
surfaces on a scale from 10 kT/e^
(red)
to +10 kT/e^ (blue).
A Mg2+ ion was placed at the X I domain
MIDAS to make the electrostatic surfaces comparable. Positions
of the metal ions in the X and M I domains
are indicated with arrows.
|
 |
Figure 2.
Fig. 2. Comparisons among closed I domain structures of
the C-terminal -strand and
-helix and
overall secondary structure. (A) The C-terminal 6-strand and
7-helix.
Superposition is based on the entire domain. The backbone
segments shown are X, residues
288-317; M, residues
290-318 of 1JLM (15); 2, residues
306-334 of 1AOX (14); and L, residues
280-308 of 1LFA (16). The side chains of Ile-332 in 2, Ile-316
in M, Ile-314
in X, and
Ile-306 in L are
shown. (B) Structure-based sequence alignment of the X, M, L, and 2 I
domains. The same closed structures as above were superimposed.
[402]alpha -Helices are shown in gold and [403]beta -strands are
shown in cyan. Secondary structure assignment was by the DSSP
algorithm (44) from the structural coordinates.
|
 |
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.R.Klatt,
A.K.Becker,
C.D.Neacsu,
M.Paulsson,
and
R.Wagener
(2011).
The matrilins: modulators of extracellular matrix assembly.
|
| |
Int J Biochem Cell Biol,
43,
320-330.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Xie,
J.Zhu,
X.Chen,
L.Mi,
N.Nishida,
and
T.A.Springer
(2010).
Structure of an integrin with an alphaI domain, complement receptor type 4.
|
| |
EMBO J,
29,
666-679.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.J.Park,
A.Peixoto,
Y.Imai,
A.Goodarzi,
G.Cheng,
C.V.Carman,
U.H.von Andrian,
and
M.Shimaoka
(2010).
Distinct roles for LFA-1 affinity regulation during T-cell adhesion, diapedesis, and interstitial migration in lymph nodes.
|
| |
Blood,
115,
1572-1581.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Choi,
J.Choi,
and
S.U.Nham
(2010).
Characterization of the residues of αX I-domain and ICAM-1 mediating their interactions.
|
| |
Mol Cells,
30,
227-234.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Z.Zhang,
Y.Zou,
T.C.Pan,
D.Markova,
A.Fertala,
Y.Hu,
S.Squarzoni,
U.C.Reed,
S.K.Marie,
C.G.Bönnemann,
and
M.L.Chu
(2010).
Recessive COL6A2 C-globular missense mutations in Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy: role of the C2a splice variant.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
285,
10005-10015.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Izoré,
C.Contreras-Martel,
L.El Mortaji,
C.Manzano,
R.Terrasse,
T.Vernet,
A.M.Di Guilmi,
and
A.Dessen
(2010).
Structural basis of host cell recognition by the pilus adhesin from Streptococcus pneumoniae.
|
| |
Structure,
18,
106-115.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Chen,
C.Xie,
N.Nishida,
Z.Li,
T.Walz,
and
T.A.Springer
(2010).
Requirement of open headpiece conformation for activation of leukocyte integrin alphaXbeta2.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
14727-14732.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Vorup-Jensen,
T.T.Waldron,
N.Astrof,
M.Shimaoka,
and
T.A.Springer
(2007).
The connection between metal ion affinity and ligand affinity in integrin I domains.
|
| |
Biochim Biophys Acta,
1774,
1148-1155.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Hänel,
T.Stangler,
M.Stoldt,
and
D.Willbold
(2006).
Solution structure of the X4 protein coded by the SARS related coronavirus reveals an immunoglobulin like fold and suggests a binding activity to integrin I domains.
|
| |
J Biomed Sci,
13,
281-293.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Shimaoka,
M.Kim,
E.H.Cohen,
W.Yang,
N.Astrof,
D.Peer,
A.Salas,
A.Ferrand,
and
T.A.Springer
(2006).
AL-57, a ligand-mimetic antibody to integrin LFA-1, reveals chemokine-induced affinity up-regulation in lymphocytes.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
103,
13991-13996.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Zhang,
E.M.Alicot,
I.Chiu,
J.Li,
N.Verna,
T.Vorup-Jensen,
B.Kessler,
M.Shimaoka,
R.Chan,
D.Friend,
U.Mahmood,
R.Weissleder,
F.D.Moore,
and
M.C.Carroll
(2006).
Identification of the target self-antigens in reperfusion injury.
|
| |
J Exp Med,
203,
141-152.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Nishida,
C.Xie,
M.Shimaoka,
Y.Cheng,
T.Walz,
and
T.A.Springer
(2006).
Activation of leukocyte beta2 integrins by conversion from bent to extended conformations.
|
| |
Immunity,
25,
583-594.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.P.Yakubenko,
S.P.Yadav,
and
T.P.Ugarova
(2006).
Integrin alphaDbeta2, an adhesion receptor up-regulated on macrophage foam cells, exhibits multiligand-binding properties.
|
| |
Blood,
107,
1643-1650.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Frick,
A.Odermatt,
K.Zen,
K.J.Mandell,
H.Edens,
R.Portmann,
L.Mazzucchelli,
D.L.Jaye,
and
C.A.Parkos
(2005).
Interaction of ICAM-1 with beta 2-integrin CD11c/CD18: characterization of a peptide ligand that mimics a putative binding site on domain D4 of ICAM-1.
|
| |
Eur J Immunol,
35,
3610-3621.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.Arnaout,
B.Mahalingam,
and
J.P.Xiong
(2005).
Integrin structure, allostery, and bidirectional signaling.
|
| |
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol,
21,
381-410.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.L.Rich,
and
D.G.Myszka
(2005).
Survey of the year 2003 commercial optical biosensor literature.
|
| |
J Mol Recognit,
18,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Vorup-Jensen,
C.V.Carman,
M.Shimaoka,
P.Schuck,
J.Svitel,
and
T.A.Springer
(2005).
Exposure of acidic residues as a danger signal for recognition of fibrinogen and other macromolecules by integrin alphaXbeta2.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
102,
1614-1619.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.V.Carman,
and
T.A.Springer
(2003).
Integrin avidity regulation: are changes in affinity and conformation underemphasized?
|
| |
Curr Opin Cell Biol,
15,
547-556.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |