 |
PDBsum entry 1m4c
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Binding of small molecules to an adaptive protein-Protein interface.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
M.R.Arkin,
M.Randal,
W.L.Delano,
J.Hyde,
T.N.Luong,
J.D.Oslob,
D.R.Raphael,
L.Taylor,
J.Wang,
R.S.Mcdowell,
J.A.Wells,
A.C.Braisted.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2003,
100,
1603-1608.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Understanding binding properties at protein-protein interfaces has been limited
to structural and mutational analyses of natural binding partners or small
peptides identified by phage display. Here, we present a high-resolution
analysis of a nonpeptidyl small molecule, previously discovered by medicinal
chemistry [Tilley, J. W., et al. (1997) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 7589-7590], which
binds to the cytokine IL-2. The small molecule binds to the same site that binds
the IL-2 alpha receptor and buries into a groove not seen in the free structure
of IL-2. Comparison of the bound and several free structures shows this site to
be composed of two subsites: one is rigid, and the other is highly adaptive.
Thermodynamic data suggest the energy barriers between these conformations are
low. The subsites were dissected by using a site-directed screening method
called tethering, in which small fragments were captured by disulfide
interchange with cysteines introduced into IL-2 around these subsites. X-ray
structures with the tethered fragments show that the subsite-binding
interactions are similar to those observed with the original small molecule.
Moreover, the adaptive subsite tethered many more compounds than did the rigid
one. Thus, the adaptive nature of a protein-protein interface provides sites for
small molecules to bind and underscores the challenge of applying
structure-based design strategies that cannot accurately predict a dynamic
protein surface.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. (a) Compound 1/IL-2 complex determined by x-ray
crystallography (Table 1). Compound 1 is shown in green sticks,
IL-2 in white ribbon. The B-C loop is not defined by the
electron density and is shown schematically in white spheres.
(b) Interaction of Compound 1 (green sticks) with IL-2 (white
sticks) taken from x-ray coordinates. Key contact side chains
are labeled; H-bonds and distances are shown by yellow dotted
lines. All molecular graphic images were produced with PYMOL (W.
L. DeLano, San Carlos, CA).
|
 |
Figure 2.
Fig. 2. Adaptivity of the IL-2-binding surface. (a)
Structure of the complex of IL-2 and Compound 1, shown as a
surface representation of IL-2 (white and orange) and stick
representation of Compound 1 (green). The residues that comprise
the IL-2R -binding
hot spot are shown in orange. Residues contacting the molecule
are labeled. (b-d) Surface representation of three different
unliganded structures (21) (b) and Native I and II (c and d;
Table 1). Compound 1 is overlaid to emphasize the extent of
rearrangement that occurs in both of the unliganded structures
and in the liganded form. Movie 1 (RIGIMOL, W. L. DeLano)
highlights the dynamic nature of this site across this series of
structures.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |