 |
PDBsum entry 1ld5
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrolase inhibitor
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1ld5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Nmr structures of two variants of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (bpti) reveal unexpected influence of mutations on protein structure and stability.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
T.Cierpicki,
J.Otlewski.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Mol Biol, 2002,
321,
647-658.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Here we determined NMR solution structures of two mutants of bovine pancreatic
trypsin inhibitor (BPTI) to reveal structural reasons of their decreased
thermodynamic stability. A point mutation, A16V, in the solvent-exposed loop
destabilizes the protein by 20 degrees C, in contrast to marginal
destabilization observed for G, S, R, L or W mutants. In the second mutant
introduction of eight alanine residues at proteinase-contacting sites (residues
11, 13, 17, 18, 19, 34, 37 and 39) provides a protein that denatures at a
temperature about 30 degrees C higher than expected from additive behavior of
individual mutations. In order to efficiently determine structures of these
variants, we applied a procedure that allows us to share data between regions
unaffected by mutation(s). NOAH/DYANA and CNS programs were used for a rapid
assignment of NOESY cross-peaks, structure calculations and refinement. The
solution structure of the A16V mutant reveals no conformational change within
the molecule, but shows close contacts between V16, I18 and G36/G37. Thus, the
observed 4.3kcal/mol decrease of stability results from a strained local
conformation of these residues caused by introduction of a beta-branched Val
side-chain. Contrary to the A16V mutation, introduction of eight alanine
residues produces significant conformational changes, manifested in over a 9A
shift of the Y35 side-chain. This structural rearrangement provides about
6kcal/mol non-additive stabilization energy, compared to the mutant in which G37
and R39 are not mutated to alanine residues.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Comparison of calculated structures of BPTI_WT,
BPTI_A16V and BPTI_8A. Upper pictures show the backbones of the
ten lowest energy structures and lower pictures show their
ribbon representation.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Comparison of binding loop conformations
(residues 11-18 and 34-40) of various BPTI mutants: BPTI_WT (PDB
code 5pti), red; BPTI_A16V , green; BPTI_A16L (PDB code 1ejm),
cyan; BPTI_G37A, blue. (a) Comparison of the effects of A16V and
A16L mutations; (b) comparison of A16V and G37A mutations. For
the reason of clarity only single conformers of the NMR
structures are displayed.The Figure was prepared in
MOLMOL/POV-Ray.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2002,
321,
647-658)
copyright 2002.
|
 |
|
Secondary reference #1
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Substitutions at the p(1) position in bpti strongly affect the association energy with serine proteinases.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
A.Grzesiak,
R.Helland,
A.O.Smalås,
D.Krowarsch,
M.Dadlez,
J.Otlewski.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Mol Biol, 2000,
301,
205-217.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Inhibition curves of human a-plasmin by Ala16,
Ala16 -> Gly and Ala16 -> Arg mutants of BPTI. Reactions were
carried out in 100 mM Tris-Cl, 20 mM CaCl[2], 150 mM NaCl, 0.05
% Triton X-100 (pH 8.3) at 298 K. Data points were analyzed
using the equations described in Materials and Methods.
|
 |
Figure 7.
Figure 7. Stereo plot illustrating the competition between
P'[1] and P'[3] residues for the same binding site. Red
(inhibitor) and grey (trypsin) describes the bovine trypsin-BPTI
P[1]-Lys complex while blue (inhibitor) and black (trypsin)
describes the trypsin-BPTI P'[1]-Leu (molecule B) complex. The
P[1], P'[1], P'[3] and P[4]' residues of the inhibitor are
illustrated as ball and stick models. The Figures are generated
using BOBSCRIPT [Kraulis 1991 and Esnouf 1997].
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reproduced from the cited reference
with permission from Elsevier
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |