|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Rangap mediates gtp hydrolysis without an arginine finger.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
M.J.Seewald,
C.Körner,
A.Wittinghofer,
I.R.Vetter.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Nature, 2002,
415,
662-666.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) increase the rate of GTP hydrolysis on guanine
nucleotide-binding proteins by many orders of magnitude. Studies with Ras and
Rho have elucidated the mechanism of GAP action by showing that their catalytic
machinery is both stabilized by GAP binding and complemented by the insertion of
a so-called 'arginine finger' into the phosphate-binding pocket. This has been
proposed as a universal mechanism for GAP-mediated GTP hydrolysis. Ran is a
nuclear Ras-related protein that regulates both transport between the nucleus
and cytoplasm during interphase, and formation of the mitotic spindle and/or
nuclear envelope in dividing cells. Ran-GTP is hydrolysed by the combined action
of Ran-binding proteins (RanBPs) and RanGAP. Here we present the
three-dimensional structure of a Ran-RanBP1-RanGAP ternary complex in the ground
state and in a transition-state mimic. The structure and biochemical experiments
show that RanGAP does not act through an arginine finger, that the basic
machinery for fast GTP hydrolysis is provided exclusively by Ran and that
correct positioning of the catalytic glutamine is essential for catalysis.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2: Details of the Ran–RanGAP interface. a, Worm plot
of Ran and RanGAP, with colours as in Fig. 1 and important
residues shown in ball and stick representation. The uncomplexed
RanGAP (cyan) is superimposed; arrows indicate the movement of
Lys 76 and Arg 74, and asterisk symbolizes the potential clash
of Leu 43 and Lys 76 on complex formation. b, Switch II of Ran
(green) superimposed on the Ran–ranBD1 structure (blue),
illustrating the reorientation of Gln 69 into a catalytically
competent conformation by the residues Tyr 39 from Ran and Asn
131 fron RanGAP.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3: The active site. a, The nucleotide and relevant
residues of Ran and RanGAP; interactions are indicated by dashed
lines. The catalytic water ('W') has very weak density (probably
owing to the limited resolution) and was not included in the
final model, but is shown here to illustrate its potential
interaction partners. It sits in a similar position as in the
Ras–RasGAP complex. Asterisk denotes the hydroxyl group of Thr
42 of Ran. The rest of the side chain is omitted for clarity. b,
The 2F[o] - F[c] electron density map contoured at 1.6 for
the structure with GDP and aluminium fluoride, the latter
modelled as AlF[3].
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nature
(2002,
415,
662-666)
copyright 2002.
|
 |
|
Secondary reference #1
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
The ras-Rasgap complex: structural basis for gtpase activation and its loss in oncogenic ras mutants.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
K.Scheffzek,
M.R.Ahmadian,
W.Kabsch,
L.Wiesmüller,
A.Lautwein,
F.Schmitz,
A.Wittinghofer.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Science, 1997,
277,
333-338.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Stereo view of a segment of the 2F[o] F[c]
electron density map (contoured at 1.2 ) covering
the active site region in the^ complex, with Ras in blue,
GAP-334 in red, and waters in light blue.
|
 |
Figure 2.
Fig. 2. The complex between GAP-334 and Ras. (A) Ribbon
representation of the complex model drawn with Molscript (52)
and^ Raster3D (53) according to the assignment of secondary
structure^ elements obtained with the program DSSP (54). The
extra and^ catalytic domains of GAP-334 are shown in green and
red (respectively), regions of GAP contacting Ras in light
brown, Ras in yellow, and^ GDP and AlF[3] as ball-and-stick
models. Regions involved in the^ interface are labeled, Sw I and
Sw II indicating the switch regions, C the COOH-terminal, and N
the NH[2]-terminal. (B) Schematic^ drawing with selected
interactions. Polar interactions between individual residues of
GAP-334 and Ras are shown as red lines for interactions of side
chains, and as red arrows for contacts from side chain to main
chain atoms, where the arrowhead marks the residue contributing
the main chain group. Yellow lines indicate^ van der Waals or
hydrophobic interactions. Some water molecules (marked W) from
the interface region are included. Residues belonging to the
interacting regions of Ras indicated in (A) are denoted^ with
specified boxes, as indicated. Interaction between Lys88 and
Thr791 is shown by a dashed arrow, because the electron density
in this region is presently not of sufficient quality to
unambiguously define the contact. Amino acid abbreviations are
in (55).
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reproduced from the cited reference
with permission from the AAAs
|
 |
|
Secondary reference #2
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Structure of a ran-Binding domain complexed with ran bound to a gtp analogue: implications for nuclear transport.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
I.R.Vetter,
C.Nowak,
T.Nishimoto,
J.Kuhlmann,
A.Wittinghofer.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Nature, 1999,
398,
39-46.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1: Representative electron density around switch I in Ran
dot- GppNHp
and the conserved WKER motif of RanBD1 (residues 57–60).
Residues from RanBD1 are represented by white carbon traces,
residues from Ran by yellow carbon traces. The omit map is
contoured at 1.1 .
The figure was prepared with BOBSCRIPT^46.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5: Molecular embrace and the DEDDDL motif. Surface
representation of RanBD1, showing the basic region where the
DEDDDL motif of Ran is expected to bind after the C terminus
wraps itself around RanBD1. Ran is shown as a backbone (green),
and GppNHp and the magnesium ion as ball and stick. The figure
was produced using GRASP^50.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reproduced from the cited reference
with permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd
|
 |
|
Secondary reference #3
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
The crystal structure of RNA1p: a new fold for a gtpase-Activating protein.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
R.C.Hillig,
L.Renault,
I.R.Vetter,
T.Drell,
A.Wittinghofer,
J.Becker.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Mol Cell, 1999,
3,
781-791.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. NCS-Averaged Experimental Electron Density MapPart
of the map showing the region of LRR8 (residues 217–243). The
refined model (ball-and-stick) is superimposed on the
experimental electron density map after 2-fold NCS averaging,
solvent flattening, and histogram matching, contoured at 1.0 σ.
Figure prepared using Bobscript ([28]).
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Structural Overlay of the 11 LRRs of rna1pLRRs that
deviate markedly from the ideal LRR structure are presented in
blue (LRR1), red (LRR3), and green (LRR5). The position of
Arg-74 is marked by a red ball. The LRR consensus residues of
LRR8 are depicted as ball-and-stick models (yellow) illustrating
the formation of the hydrophobic core. Figure produced with
Bobscript ([28]).
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reproduced from the cited reference
with permission from Cell Press
|
 |
|
Secondary reference #4
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Rna1 encodes a gtpase-Activating protein specific for gsp1p, The ran/tc4 homologue of saccharomyces cerevisiae.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
J.Becker,
F.Melchior,
V.Gerke,
F.R.Bischoff,
H.Ponstingl,
A.Wittinghofer.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Biol Chem, 1995,
270,
11860-11865.
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Secondary reference #5
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
The acidic c-Terminal domain of RNA1p is required for the binding of ran.Gtp and for rangap activity.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
J.Haberland,
J.Becker,
V.Gerke.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Biol Chem, 1997,
272,
24717-24726.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 5.
Fig. 5. GAP activity of S. pombe rna1p in the presence of
increasing concentrations of the C-terminally truncated mutant
protein rna1 p341. 1
µM Ran loaded with [ -32P]GTP
was incubated at 30 °C with buffer ( circle ),
0.025 nM rna1p ( ), 0.05 nM
rna1p ( ), or 0.1
nM rna1p ( ). In the
latter case (1^ µM Ran, 0.1 nM rna1p) the reaction was
carried out in the absence^ ( ) or
presence of 0.025 nM rna1p 341 ( ), 0.05 nM
rna1p 341 ( ), 0.1 nM
rna1p 341
(×), 0.2 nM rna1p 341 ( ), 0.5 nM
rna1p 341 ( ), 2 nM
rna1p 341 ( ), or 20 nM
rna1p 341 ( ). GTPase
activity was determined as decrease of the nitrocellulose-bound
[ -32P]GTP,
and results are given as the percentage of radioactivity bound
to Ran 30 s after addition of the respective GAP. The individual
experiments were carried out at least three times, and curves of
a representative experiment are shown. Note that the addition of
increasing amounts ot the rna1p 341 does
not affect the GAP activity of 0.1 nM wild-type rna1p. All
curves characterizing the reactions containing 1 µM Ran
and 0.1 nM rna1p are nearly identical and partially mask one
another.
|
 |
Figure 10.
Fig. 10. GAP activities of the rna1p 361/QQDQ
and GST-rna1pCT mutant proteins. A, 1 µM Ran complexed
with [ -32P]GTP
was incubated at 30 °C with buffer alone ( circle ),
with 0.1 nM rna1p ( ), with 0.1
nM rna1p 361 ( ), or with
0.1 nM rna1p 361/QQDQ (
). B,
mixtures consisted of 1 µM [ -32P]GTP-loaded
Ran and buffer alone ( circle ),
0.1 nM rna1p ( ), 0.1 nM
GST ( ), 0.1 nM
GST-rna1pCT ( ), or 50
nM GST-rna1pCT ( ). GTPase^
activities were determined as the decrease of nitrocellulose
bound^ [ -32P]GTP,
and results are given as percentage of the radioactivity bound
to Ran after the addition of buffer, rna1p, rna1p 361, rna1p
361/QQDQ,
GST, or GST-rna1pCT, respectively. All curves characterizing
reactions containing GST or GST fusion proteins are
indistinguishable from the control with buffer alone.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reproduced from the cited reference
with permission from the ASBMB
|
 |
|
|
|
|