spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 1h04

Go to PDB code: 
Top Page protein metals links
Immune system protein PDB id
1h04
Contents
Protein chain
125 a.a. *
Metals
_NI
Waters ×142
* Residue conservation analysis

References listed in PDB file
Key reference
Title Mapping cd55 function. The structure of two pathogen-Binding domains at 1.7 a.
Authors P.Williams, Y.Chaudhry, I.G.Goodfellow, J.Billington, R.Powell, O.B.Spiller, D.J.Evans, S.Lea.
Ref. J Biol Chem, 2003, 278, 10691-10696. [DOI no: 10.1074/jbc.M212561200]
PubMed id 12499389
Abstract
Decay-accelerating factor (CD55), a regulator of the alternative and classical pathways of complement activation, is expressed on all serum-exposed cells. It is used by pathogens, including many enteroviruses and uropathogenic Escherichia coli, as a receptor prior to infection. We describe the x-ray structure of a pathogen-binding fragment of human CD55 at 1.7 A resolution containing two of the three domains required for regulation of human complement. We have used mutagenesis to map biological functions onto the molecule; decay-accelerating activity maps to a single face of the molecule, whereas bacterial and viral pathogens recognize a variety of different sites on CD55.
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Fold and arrangement of SCR domains in CD55[34]. This figure was drawn using AESOP (M. E. M. Noble, unpublished program). A, secondary structure and location of disulfide bonds in CD55[34]. Strands are labeled according to the convention defined by Norman et al. (35). Note that there is no strand 1 as the hydrogen-bonding pattern of these residues does not meet the strict criteria for definition of a -strand. B, variation in orientation between SCR domains 3 and 4 in the five independent copies of CD55[34] found in the different crystal forms (Table I). C, model for topology of CD55 in the membrane based on our structure of CD55[34].
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Mapping of functional data onto the structure of CD55[34]. This figure was drawn using AESOP (M. E. M. Noble, unpublished program). All plates show two views of the surface of CD55, the first view corresponding to the orientation as shown in Fig. 1 and termed Front View. The Back View corresponds to a rotation of 180 degrees about the long axis of the molecule. A, orange indicates the sites mutagenized in this study, and yellow indicates the sites of sequence difference between AGM and human CD55. B, AP indicates the mutation shown to effect alternative pathway decay acceleration, and CP indicates those sites shown to affect classical pathway decay acceleration; both those sites have been shown to affect both pathways. Dark green indicates those sites shown previously to effect both classical and alternative pathway decay acceleration (22). C, sites marked with a virus name have been shown to affect binding of that virus. Sites marked in pale pink are the sites of difference between AGM and human CD55 that are known to abolish EV11 binding and significantly reduce EV12 binding. D, the locations of two of the Cromer variants of human CD55 are shown. Different E. coli strains are sensitive to changes at one or other of these positions (28, 30, 32).
The above figures are reprinted by permission from the ASBMB: J Biol Chem (2003, 278, 10691-10696) copyright 2003.
Secondary reference #1
Title Crystallization and preliminary X-Ray diffraction analysis of a biologically active fragment of cd55.
Authors S.Lea, R.Powell, D.Evans.
Ref. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 1999, 55, 1198-1200. [DOI no: 10.1107/S0907444999001638]
PubMed id 10329784
Full text Abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1 Crystals of CD55 domains 3 and 4. (a) Orthorhombic crystal form; crystal is 0.5 mm in the longest dimension. (b) Monoclinic crystal form; crystal on the right is 0.3 mm in the longest dimension.
The above figure is reproduced from the cited reference with permission from the IUCr
Secondary reference #2
Title Determination of the affinity and kinetic constants for the interaction between the human virus echovirus 11 and its cellular receptor, Cd55.
Authors S.M.Lea, R.M.Powell, T.Mckee, D.J.Evans, D.Brown, D.I.Stuart, P.A.Van der merwe.
Ref. J Biol Chem, 1998, 273, 30443-30447. [DOI no: 10.1074/jbc.273.46.30443]
PubMed id 9804811
Full text Abstract
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Measuring the affinity and kinetics of DAF[234] binding to EV11 by surface plasmon resonance. A, DAF[234] (12 µM) was injected (bar) for 22.5 s over sensor surfaces with a high level of (3020 RU), a low level of (1370 RU), or no (control) EV11 immobilized. An overlay plot of all three sensorgrams is shown, normalized to the same preinjection level. Inset, same sensorgrams after subtraction of the control sensorgram. In B, DAF[234] was injected (bar) at the indicated concentration for 22.5 s over sensor surfaces with EV11 (3020 RU) or no protein immobilized. An overlay plot is shown of all five sensorgrams after subtraction of their respective control sensorgrams. Curves, a fit of the simple Langmuir binding model (A + B AB) to all sensorgrams simultaneously gives a k[on] of 140,000 M 1·s 1 and a k[off] of 0.3 s 1. The curve fitting was performed by numerical integration using the global analysis option (i.e. simultaneous fitting of the association and dissociation phases) of BIAevaluation 3.0 (BIAcore AB). C, plot of the equilibrium response obtained in A during injection of different DAF[234] concentrations. Nonlinear curve fitting of the Langmuir binding model to these data (bar) gives a K[D] of 2.8 µM. Inset, Scatchard plot of the same data. A linear fit of these data (bar) also gives a K[D] of 2.8 µM.
The above figure is reproduced from the cited reference with permission from the ASBMB
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers

 

spacer

spacer