spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 1gzc

Go to PDB code: 
Top Page protein ligands metals links
Sugar binding protein PDB id
1gzc
Contents
Protein chain
239 a.a. *
Ligands
BGC-GAL
Metals
_CA
_MN
Waters ×266
* Residue conservation analysis

References listed in PDB file
Key reference
Title High-Resolution crystal structures of erythrina cristagalli lectin in complex with lactose and 2'-Alpha-L-Fucosyllactose and correlation with thermodynamic binding data.
Authors C.Svensson, S.Teneberg, C.L.Nilsson, A.Kjellberg, F.P.Schwarz, N.Sharon, U.Krengel.
Ref. J Mol Biol, 2002, 321, 69-83. [DOI no: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00554-5]
PubMed id 12139934
Abstract
The primary sequence of Erythrina cristagalli lectin (ECL) was mapped by mass spectrometry, and the crystal structures of the lectin in complex with lactose and 2'-alpha-L-fucosyllactose were determined at 1.6A and 1.7A resolution, respectively. The two complexes were compared with the crystal structure of the closely related Erythrina corallodendron lectin (ECorL) in complex with lactose, with the crystal structure of the Ulex europaeus lectin II in complex with 2'-alpha-L-fucosyllactose, and with two modeled complexes of ECorL with 2'-alpha-L-fucosyl-N-acetyllactosamine. The molecular models are very similar to the crystal structure of ECL in complex with 2'-alpha-L-fucosyllactose with respect to the overall mode of binding, with the L-fucose fitting snugly into the cavity surrounded by Tyr106, Tyr108, Trp135 and Pro134 adjoining the primary combining site of the lectin. Marked differences were however noted between the models and the experimental structure in the network of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions holding the L-fucose in the combining site of the lectin, pointing to limitations of the modeling approach. In addition to the structural characterization of the ECL complexes, an effort was undertaken to correlate the structural data with thermodynamic data obtained from microcalorimetry, revealing the importance of the water network in the lectin combining site for carbohydrate binding.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Electron density for lactose (a) and fucosyllactose (b), in the respective ECL complexes. 2F[o] -F[c] simulated-annealing omit maps covering the saccharides, displayed at 1s.
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Topology of ECL (complex with lactose). ECL residues that differ from ECorL are shown explicity. In addition, Val 92, the interaction partner of residues 111 and 125, is highlighted in orange.
The above figures are reprinted by permission from Elsevier: J Mol Biol (2002, 321, 69-83) copyright 2002.
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers

 

spacer

spacer