|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class 2:
|
 |
Chain A:
E.C.2.3.2.23
- E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
S-ubiquitinyl-[E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme]-L-cysteine + [E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme]-L-cysteine = [E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme]-L-cysteine + S-ubiquitinyl-[E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme]-L- cysteine
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class 3:
|
 |
Chain B:
E.C.?
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Note, where more than one E.C. class is given (as above), each may
correspond to a different protein domain or, in the case of polyprotein
precursors, to a different mature protein.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Structure
9:897-904
(2001)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structure of a conjugating enzyme-ubiquitin thiolester intermediate reveals a novel role for the ubiquitin tail.
|
|
K.S.Hamilton,
M.J.Ellison,
K.R.Barber,
R.S.Williams,
J.T.Huzil,
S.McKenna,
C.Ptak,
M.Glover,
G.S.Shaw.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
BACKGROUND: Ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s) are central enzymes involved in
ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation. During this process, ubiquitin (Ub) and
the E2 protein form an unstable E2-Ub thiolester intermediate prior to the
transfer of ubiquitin to an E3-ligase protein and the labeling of a substrate
for degradation. A series of complex interactions occur among the target
substrate, ubiquitin, E2, and E3 in order to efficiently facilitate the transfer
of the ubiquitin molecule. However, due to the inherent instability of the E2-Ub
thiolester, the structural details of this complex intermediate are not known.
RESULTS: A three-dimensional model of the E2-Ub thiolester intermediate has been
determined for the catalytic domain of the E2 protein Ubc1 (Ubc1(Delta450)) and
ubiquitin from S. cerevisiae. The interface of the E2-Ub intermediate was
determined by kinetically monitoring thiolester formation by 1H-(15)N HSQC
spectra by using combinations of 15N-labeled and unlabeled Ubc1(Delta450) and Ub
proteins. By using the surface interface as a guide and the X-ray structures of
Ub and the 1.9 A structure of Ubc1(Delta450) determined here, docking
simulations followed by energy minimization were used to produce the first model
of a E2-Ub thiolester intermediate. CONCLUSIONS: Complementary surfaces were
found on the E2 and Ub proteins whereby the C terminus of Ub wraps around the E2
protein terminating in the thiolester between C88 (Ubc1(Delta450)) and G76 (Ub).
The model supports in vivo and in vitro experiments of E2 derivatives carrying
surface residue substitutions. Furthermore, the model provides insights into the
arrangement of Ub, E2, and E3 within a ternary targeting complex.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Model of the E2-Ub Thiolester IntermediateThe
model was determined by Monte Carlo docking as described in
Experimental Procedures. The model shows (a) side and (b) end
orientation views of helix a2 in the E2 molecule. Residues are
indicated on both E2 and Ub to indicate important side
chain-side chain interactions that arise at the protein-protein
interface, as described in the text. In both figures, the
thiol-forming C88 residue in E2 is a shown as a yellow
ball-and-stick representation near the (a) center and (b) top of
the complex 
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figure is
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Structure
(2001,
9,
897-904)
copyright 2001.
|
|
| |
Figure was
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.Plechanovová,
E.G.Jaffray,
M.H.Tatham,
J.H.Naismith,
and
R.T.Hay
(2012).
Structure of a RING E3 ligase and ubiquitin-loaded E2 primed for catalysis.
|
| |
Nature,
489,
115-120.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Dou,
L.Buetow,
G.J.Sibbet,
K.Cameron,
and
D.T.Huang
(2012).
BIRC7-E2 ubiquitin conjugate structure reveals the mechanism of ubiquitin transfer by a RING dimer.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
19,
876-883.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Lass,
R.Cocklin,
K.M.Scaglione,
M.Skowyra,
S.Korolev,
M.Goebl,
and
D.Skowyra
(2011).
The loop-less tmCdc34 E2 mutant defective in polyubiquitination in vitro and in vivo supports yeast growth in a manner dependent on Ubp14 and Cka2.
|
| |
Cell Div,
6,
7.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Saha,
S.Lewis,
G.Kleiger,
B.Kuhlman,
and
R.J.Deshaies
(2011).
Essential role for ubiquitin-ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme interaction in ubiquitin discharge from Cdc34 to substrate.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
42,
75-83.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.E.Wickliffe,
S.Lorenz,
D.E.Wemmer,
J.Kuriyan,
and
M.Rape
(2011).
The mechanism of linkage-specific ubiquitin chain elongation by a single-subunit E2.
|
| |
Cell,
144,
769-781.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.R.Cole,
L.P.Lewis,
and
H.Walden
(2010).
The structure of the catalytic subunit FANCL of the Fanconi anemia core complex.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
17,
294-298.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.M.Wenzel,
K.E.Stoll,
and
R.E.Klevit
(2010).
E2s: structurally economical and functionally replete.
|
| |
Biochem J,
433,
31-42.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Sakata,
T.Satoh,
S.Yamamoto,
Y.Yamaguchi,
M.Yagi-Utsumi,
E.Kurimoto,
K.Tanaka,
S.Wakatsuki,
and
K.Kato
(2010).
Crystal structure of UbcH5b~ubiquitin intermediate: insight into the formation of the self-assembled E2~Ub conjugates.
|
| |
Structure,
18,
138-147.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.C.Rodrigo-Brenni,
S.A.Foster,
and
D.O.Morgan
(2010).
Catalysis of lysine 48-specific ubiquitin chain assembly by residues in E2 and ubiquitin.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
39,
548-559.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.G.Sgourakis,
M.M.Patel,
A.E.Garcia,
G.I.Makhatadze,
and
S.A.McCallum
(2010).
Conformational dynamics and structural plasticity play critical roles in the ubiquitin recognition of a UIM domain.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
396,
1128-1144.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Ju,
W.Bocik,
A.Majumdar,
and
J.R.Tolman
(2010).
Solution structure and dynamics of human ubiquitin conjugating enzyme Ube2g2.
|
| |
Proteins,
78,
1291-1301.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Liu,
F.Forouhar,
A.Eletsky,
H.S.Atreya,
J.M.Aramini,
R.Xiao,
Y.J.Huang,
M.Abashidze,
J.Seetharaman,
J.Liu,
B.Rost,
T.Acton,
G.T.Montelione,
J.F.Hunt,
and
T.Szyperski
(2009).
NMR and X-RAY structures of human E2-like ubiquitin-fold modifier conjugating enzyme 1 (UFC1) reveal structural and functional conservation in the metazoan UFM1-UBA5-UFC1 ubiquination pathway.
|
| |
J Struct Funct Genomics,
10,
127-136.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Das,
J.Mariano,
Y.C.Tsai,
R.C.Kalathur,
Z.Kostova,
J.Li,
S.G.Tarasov,
R.L.McFeeters,
A.S.Altieri,
X.Ji,
R.A.Byrd,
and
A.M.Weissman
(2009).
Allosteric activation of E2-RING finger-mediated ubiquitylation by a structurally defined specific E2-binding region of gp78.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
34,
674-685.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Zhou,
Z.W.Carpenter,
G.Brennan,
and
J.R.Nambu
(2009).
The unique Morgue ubiquitination protein is conserved in a diverse but restricted set of invertebrates.
|
| |
Mol Biol Evol,
26,
2245-2259.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Ponts,
J.Yang,
D.W.Chung,
J.Prudhomme,
T.Girke,
P.Horrocks,
and
K.G.Le Roch
(2008).
Deciphering the ubiquitin-mediated pathway in apicomplexan parasites: a potential strategy to interfere with parasite virulence.
|
| |
PLoS ONE,
3,
e2386.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Slama,
I.Filippis,
and
M.Lappe
(2008).
Detection of protein catalytic residues at high precision using local network properties.
|
| |
BMC Bioinformatics,
9,
517.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Beaudenon,
and
J.M.Huibregtse
(2008).
HPV E6, E6AP and cervical cancer.
|
| |
BMC Biochem,
9,
S4.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.D.Capili,
and
C.D.Lima
(2007).
Taking it step by step: mechanistic insights from structural studies of ubiquitin/ubiquitin-like protein modification pathways.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
17,
726-735.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.T.Dye,
and
B.A.Schulman
(2007).
Structural mechanisms underlying posttranslational modification by ubiquitin-like proteins.
|
| |
Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct,
36,
131-150.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.T.Huang,
H.W.Hunt,
M.Zhuang,
M.D.Ohi,
J.M.Holton,
and
B.A.Schulman
(2007).
Basis for a ubiquitin-like protein thioester switch toggling E1-E2 affinity.
|
| |
Nature,
445,
394-398.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.T.Huzil,
R.Pannu,
C.Ptak,
G.Garen,
and
M.J.Ellison
(2007).
Direct catalysis of lysine 48-linked polyubiquitin chains by the ubiquitin-activating enzyme.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
282,
37454-37460.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.M.Scaglione,
P.K.Bansal,
A.E.Deffenbaugh,
A.Kiss,
J.M.Moore,
S.Korolev,
R.Cocklin,
M.Goebl,
K.Kitagawa,
and
D.Skowyra
(2007).
SCF E3-mediated autoubiquitination negatively regulates activity of Cdc34 E2 but plays a nonessential role in the catalytic cycle in vitro and in vivo.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
27,
5860-5870.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Knipscheer,
W.J.van Dijk,
J.V.Olsen,
M.Mann,
and
T.K.Sixma
(2007).
Noncovalent interaction between Ubc9 and SUMO promotes SUMO chain formation.
|
| |
EMBO J,
26,
2797-2807.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Gazdoiu,
K.Yamoah,
K.Wu,
and
Z.Q.Pan
(2007).
Human Cdc34 employs distinct sites to coordinate attachment of ubiquitin to a substrate and assembly of polyubiquitin chains.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
27,
7041-7052.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Yamada,
N.N.Suzuki,
T.Hanada,
Y.Ichimura,
H.Kumeta,
Y.Fujioka,
Y.Ohsumi,
and
F.Inagaki
(2007).
The crystal structure of Atg3, an autophagy-related ubiquitin carrier protein (E2) enzyme that mediates Atg8 lipidation.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
282,
8036-8043.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.J.Eddins,
C.M.Carlile,
K.M.Gomez,
C.M.Pickart,
and
C.Wolberger
(2006).
Mms2-Ubc13 covalently bound to ubiquitin reveals the structural basis of linkage-specific polyubiquitin chain formation.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
13,
915-920.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Wang,
D.Cheng,
J.Peng,
and
C.M.Pickart
(2006).
Molecular determinants of polyubiquitin linkage selection by an HECT ubiquitin ligase.
|
| |
EMBO J,
25,
1710-1719.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.S.Brzovic,
A.Lissounov,
D.E.Christensen,
D.W.Hoyt,
and
R.E.Klevit
(2006).
A UbcH5/ubiquitin noncovalent complex is required for processive BRCA1-directed ubiquitination.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
21,
873-880.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.L.Alam,
and
W.I.Sundquist
(2006).
Two new structures of Ub-receptor complexes. U2.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
13,
186-188.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Pichler,
P.Knipscheer,
E.Oberhofer,
W.J.van Dijk,
R.Körner,
J.V.Olsen,
S.Jentsch,
F.Melchior,
and
T.K.Sixma
(2005).
SUMO modification of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-25K.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
12,
264-269.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Tsui,
A.Raguraj,
and
C.M.Pickart
(2005).
Ubiquitin binding site of the ubiquitin E2 variant (UEV) protein Mms2 is required for DNA damage tolerance in the yeast RAD6 pathway.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
280,
19829-19835.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Reverter,
and
C.D.Lima
(2005).
Insights into E3 ligase activity revealed by a SUMO-RanGAP1-Ubc9-Nup358 complex.
|
| |
Nature,
435,
687-692.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.T.Huang,
A.Paydar,
M.Zhuang,
M.B.Waddell,
J.M.Holton,
and
B.A.Schulman
(2005).
Structural basis for recruitment of Ubc12 by an E2 binding domain in NEDD8's E1.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
17,
341-350.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Ozkan,
H.Yu,
and
J.Deisenhofer
(2005).
Mechanistic insight into the allosteric activation of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme by RING-type ubiquitin ligases.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
102,
18890-18895.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Massi,
M.J.Grey,
and
A.G.Palmer
(2005).
Microsecond timescale backbone conformational dynamics in ubiquitin studied with NMR R1rho relaxation experiments.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
14,
735-742.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Hicke,
H.L.Schubert,
and
C.P.Hill
(2005).
Ubiquitin-binding domains.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
6,
610-621.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Pastushok,
T.F.Moraes,
M.J.Ellison,
and
W.Xiao
(2005).
A single Mms2 "key" residue insertion into a Ubc13 pocket determines the interface specificity of a human Lys63 ubiquitin conjugation complex.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
280,
17891-17900.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Merkley,
K.R.Barber,
and
G.S.Shaw
(2005).
Ubiquitin manipulation by an E2 conjugating enzyme using a novel covalent intermediate.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
280,
31732-31738.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.J.Stogios,
G.S.Downs,
J.J.Jauhal,
S.K.Nandra,
and
G.G.Privé
(2005).
Sequence and structural analysis of BTB domain proteins.
|
| |
Genome Biol,
6,
R82.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.M.Eletr,
D.T.Huang,
D.M.Duda,
B.A.Schulman,
and
B.Kuhlman
(2005).
E2 conjugating enzymes must disengage from their E1 enzymes before E3-dependent ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like transfer.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
12,
933-934.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Dominguez,
A.M.Bonvin,
G.S.Winkler,
F.M.van Schaik,
H.T.Timmers,
and
R.Boelens
(2004).
Structural model of the UbcH5B/CNOT4 complex revealed by combining NMR, mutagenesis, and docking approaches.
|
| |
Structure,
12,
633-644.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.T.Huang,
D.W.Miller,
R.Mathew,
R.Cassell,
J.M.Holton,
M.F.Roussel,
and
B.A.Schulman
(2004).
A unique E1-E2 interaction required for optimal conjugation of the ubiquitin-like protein NEDD8.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
11,
927-935.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Teo,
D.B.Veprintsev,
and
R.L.Williams
(2004).
Structural insights into endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT-I) recognition of ubiquitinated proteins.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
279,
28689-28696.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Smalle,
and
R.D.Vierstra
(2004).
The ubiquitin 26S proteasome proteolytic pathway.
|
| |
Annu Rev Plant Biol,
55,
555-590.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Merkley,
and
G.S.Shaw
(2004).
Solution structure of the flexible class II ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc1 provides insights for polyubiquitin chain assembly.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
279,
47139-47147.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.J.Winn,
T.L.Religa,
J.N.Battey,
A.Banerjee,
and
R.C.Wade
(2004).
Determinants of functionality in the ubiquitin conjugating enzyme family.
|
| |
Structure,
12,
1563-1574.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.I.Sundquist,
H.L.Schubert,
B.N.Kelly,
G.C.Hill,
J.M.Holton,
and
C.P.Hill
(2004).
Ubiquitin recognition by the human TSG101 protein.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
13,
783-789.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
B.R.Wong,
F.Parlati,
K.Qu,
S.Demo,
T.Pray,
J.Huang,
D.G.Payan,
and
M.K.Bennett
(2003).
Drug discovery in the ubiquitin regulatory pathway.
|
| |
Drug Discov Today,
8,
746-754.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.Verdecia,
C.A.Joazeiro,
N.J.Wells,
J.L.Ferrer,
M.E.Bowman,
T.Hunter,
and
J.P.Noel
(2003).
Conformational flexibility underlies ubiquitin ligation mediated by the WWP1 HECT domain E3 ligase.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
11,
249-259.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Y.Wu,
M.Hanlon,
M.Eddins,
C.Tsui,
R.S.Rogers,
J.P.Jensen,
M.J.Matunis,
A.M.Weissman,
A.M.Weisman,
A.M.Weissman,
C.Wolberger,
C.P.Wolberger,
and
C.M.Pickart
(2003).
A conserved catalytic residue in the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme family.
|
| |
EMBO J,
22,
5241-5250.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.McKenna,
T.Moraes,
L.Pastushok,
C.Ptak,
W.Xiao,
L.Spyracopoulos,
and
M.J.Ellison
(2003).
An NMR-based model of the ubiquitin-bound human ubiquitin conjugation complex Mms2.Ubc13. The structural basis for lysine 63 chain catalysis.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
278,
13151-13158.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Orlicky,
X.Tang,
A.Willems,
M.Tyers,
and
F.Sicheri
(2003).
Structural basis for phosphodependent substrate selection and orientation by the SCFCdc4 ubiquitin ligase.
|
| |
Cell,
112,
243-256.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Varelas,
C.Ptak,
and
M.J.Ellison
(2003).
Cdc34 self-association is facilitated by ubiquitin thiolester formation and is required for its catalytic activity.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
23,
5388-5400.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.P.Bencsath,
M.S.Podgorski,
V.R.Pagala,
C.A.Slaughter,
and
B.A.Schulman
(2002).
Identification of a multifunctional binding site on Ubc9p required for Smt3p conjugation.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
277,
47938-47945.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Hochstrasser
(2002).
New structural clues to substrate specificity in the "ubiquitin system".
|
| |
Mol Cell,
9,
453-454.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Pornillos,
S.L.Alam,
R.L.Rich,
D.G.Myszka,
D.R.Davis,
and
W.I.Sundquist
(2002).
Structure and functional interactions of the Tsg101 UEV domain.
|
| |
EMBO J,
21,
2397-2406.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |