 |
PDBsum entry 1fs1
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Insights into scf ubiquitin ligases from the structure of the skp1-Skp2 complex.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
B.A.Schulman,
A.C.Carrano,
P.D.Jeffrey,
Z.Bowen,
E.R.Kinnucan,
M.S.Finnin,
S.J.Elledge,
J.W.Harper,
M.Pagano,
N.P.Pavletich.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Nature, 2000,
408,
381-386.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
F-box proteins are members of a large family that regulates the cell cycle, the
immune response, signalling cascades and developmental programmes by targeting
proteins, such as cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, IkappaBalpha and
beta-catenin, for ubiquitination (reviewed in refs 1-3). F-box proteins are the
substrate-recognition components of SCF (Skp1-Cullin-F-box protein)
ubiquitin-protein ligases. They bind the SCF constant catalytic core by means of
the F-box motif interacting with Skp1, and they bind substrates through their
variable protein-protein interaction domains. The large number of F-box proteins
is thought to allow ubiquitination of numerous, diverse substrates. Most
organisms have several Skp1 family members, but the function of these Skp1
homologues and the rules of recognition between different F-box and Skp1
proteins remain unknown. Here we describe the crystal structure of the human
F-box protein Skp2 bound to Skp1. Skp1 recruits the F-box protein through a
bipartite interface involving both the F-box and the substrate-recognition
domain. The structure raises the possibility that different Skp1 family members
evolved to function with different subsets of F-box proteins, and suggests that
the F-box protein may not only recruit substrate, but may also position it
optimally for the ubiquitination reaction.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1: Structure of the Skp1-Skp2 complex. Skp1 is shown
in blue and Skp2 is shown in red. The boundaries of the BTB/POZ
fold, the C-terminal helical extension of Skp1 and of the F-box,
the three non-canonical LRRs, the seven canonical LRRs and the
C-terminal tail of Skp2 are shown in the diagram below the
structure. The 100-residue N-terminal Skp2 region missing from
the crystallized protein is indicated (dashed line). The second
LRR has a partially disordered loop instead of the helix
characteristic of LRRs.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4: Comparison of the Skp2-Skp1 and VHL-ElonginC-ElonginB
complexes. a, Homologous portions of Skp1 and ElonginC are
aligned and boxed. Skp2 and VHL are red, Skp1 and ElonginC are
blue and ElonginB is green. The LRRs of Skp2 (refs 4, 8, 26, 27)
and the -domain
of VHL are thought to bind substrate^23. Owing to its unique C
terminus, Skp1 binds the F-box differently from the way that
ElonginC binds VHL. The arrangement of helices in the two
interfaces is similar, although the helices come from
non-corresponding members of the complexes (H1 and H2 from VHL
superimpose with H6 and H7 from Skp1, not helices from Skp2). b,
The ElonginC-binding region of VHL resembles the three-helix
cluster structure of the F-box.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nature
(2000,
408,
381-386)
copyright 2000.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |