 |
PDBsum entry 1f6f
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hormone/growth factor/hormone receptor
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1f6f
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Ternary complex between placental lactogen and the extracellular domain of the prolactin receptor.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
P.A.Elkins,
H.W.Christinger,
Y.Sandowski,
E.Sakal,
A.Gertler,
A.M.De vos,
A.A.Kossiakoff.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Nat Struct Biol, 2000,
7,
808-815.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
The structure of the ternary complex between ovine placental lactogen (oPL) and
the extracellular domain (ECD) of the rat prolactin receptor (rPRLR) reveals
that two rPRLR ECDs bind to opposite sides of oPL with pseudo two-fold symmetry.
The two oPL receptor binding sites differ significantly in their topography and
electrostatic character. These binding interfaces also involve different
hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic packing patterns compared to the structurally
related human growth hormone (hGH)-receptor complexes. Additionally, the
receptor-receptor interactions are different from those of the hGH-receptor
complex. The conformational adaptability of prolactin and growth hormone
receptors is evidenced by the changes in local conformations of the receptor
binding loops and more global changes induced by shifts in the angular
relationships between the N- and C-terminal domains, which allow the receptor to
bind to the two topographically distinct sites of oPL.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. The oPL -rPRLR[2] ternary complex. The binding
loops on R1 and R2 are numbered. Loops L1 -L3 are in the
N-terminal domain of the receptor, L4 is in the linker region
between the domains and L5 and L6 are in the C-terminal domain.
In the R2 C-terminal domain, L5 and L6 are disordered. The -sheet
cores of the domains of R1 and R2 superimpose with an r.m.s.
deviation for the N-terminal domain of 0.8 Å for 53 C atoms;
for the C-terminal domain the r.m.s. deviation is 0.5 Å for 63 C
atoms.
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Ribbon diagram of oPL (left) and hGH (right).
Helices 1 -4 are labeled on the oPL molecule, and the crossover
loop between helices 1 and 2 and the mini-helix are labeled on
the hGH molecule. The N-terminal extension on oPL is shown in
yellow. In the oPL model, residues 46 -47, 96 -100 and 190 -191
are omitted due to disorder.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nat Struct Biol
(2000,
7,
808-815)
copyright 2000.
|
 |
|
Secondary reference #1
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Crystallization of ovine placental lactogen in a 1:2 complex with the extracellular domain of the rat prolactin receptor.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
H.W.Christinger,
P.A.Elkins,
Y.Sandowski,
E.Sakal,
A.Gertler,
A.A.Kossiakoff,
A.M.De vos.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 1998,
54,
1408-1411.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2 Crystal of the complex of ovine placental lactogen
with two copies of the extracellular domain of the rat prolactin
receptor. The crystal shown has dimensions of approximately
0.050 × 0.075 × 0.250 mm.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figure is
reproduced from the cited reference
with permission from the IUCr
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |