 |
PDBsum entry 1dfl
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractile protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1dfl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
772 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Three conformational states of scallop myosin s1.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
A.Houdusse,
A.G.Szent-Gyorgyi,
C.Cohen.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2000,
97,
11238-11243.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
We have determined the structure of the intact scallop myosin head, containing
both the motor domain and the lever arm, in the nucleotide-free state and in the
presence of MgADP.V04, corresponding to the transition state. These two new
structures, together with the previously determined structure of scallop S1
complexed with MgADP (which we interpret as a detached ATP state), reveal three
conformations of an intact S1 obtained from a single isoform. These studies,
together with new crystallization results, show how the conformation of the
motor depends on the nucleotide content of the active site. The resolution of
the two new structures ( approximately 4 A) is sufficient to establish the
relative positions of the subdomains and the overall conformation of the joints
within the motor domain as well as the position of the lever arm. Comparison of
available crystal structures from different myosin isoforms and truncated
constructs in either the nucleotide-free or transition states indicates that the
major features within the motor domain are relatively invariant in both these
states. In contrast, the position of the lever arm varies significantly between
different isoforms. These results indicate that the heavy-chain helix is pliant
at the junction between the converter and the lever arm and that factors other
than the precise position of the converter can influence the position of the
lever arm. It is possible that this pliant junction in the myosin head
contributes to the compliance known to be present in the crossbridge.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Fig. 2. (A) Ribbon diagrams of the nucleotide-free
scallop S1 structure (Lower) and of scallop S1-VO[4] (Upper)
oriented such that the lower 50-kDa subdomains of these two
structures superimpose. An arrow indicates the approximate
direction of the actin filament axis relative to this subdomain,
deduced from an electron microscope study of S1-decorated actin
(16). The position of the ELC in the scallop nucleotide-free
structure is very close to that found in the electron-microscope
maps of actin decorated with vertebrate smooth muscle myosin S1
under rigor conditions (16). No data are available to indicate
how S1 binds to actin in the prepower stroke state; for
illustrative purposes only, we have chosen to orient this
structure by assuming that the interactions with the lower
50-kDa subdomain would be conserved. The lever arm is positioned
at 90° and
25° to the actin filament axis in the transition-state and
near-rigor structures, respectively. (Note that for measuring
angles, the lever-arm position is taken as a straight line drawn
from the N-terminal side of the lever-arm helix to the sharp
bend near the C terminus.) (B) Schematic drawings of the
transition-state and the near-rigor conformations of scallop
myosin from an interpretation of the structures seen in A. The
rotation of the converter (green)/relay (yellow) module during
the power stroke is amplified by the lever arm (scallop blue
helix, light chains omitted for clarity). The direction of the
movement of the subdomains in the transition between the two
states is indicated with black arrows. Although the subdomains
of the MD are similar in different isoforms, differences are
seen in the lever-arm position. To illustrate this point, the
position of the lever arm found in smooth muscle MDE (purple
helix, Upper) and that of chicken striated muscle myosin S1
(purple helix, Lower) is compared with the positions found for
scallop myosin in the transition state and near-rigor state,
respectively. Differences in the bending of the heavy-chain
helix at the junction between the converter and the lever arm
result in markedly different orientations for the lever arm of
these structures representing the same state. (C) Schematic
drawing of an orthogonal view of the structures seen in A. In
this orientation, the actin filament axis is approximately
perpendicular to the page, and one can thus estimate the
azimuthal component of the movement of the lever arm. This
component is very small in the case of scallop. In contrast,
bending of the heavy-chain helix at the pliant region in smooth
MDE in the transition-state conformation could lead to a large
azimuthal component during the power-stroke in this myosin.
Comparison of the transition-state and near-rigor conformations
in this view reveals changes in the position of the upper and
lower 50-kDa subdomains related to differences in both the
conformation of switch II and the actin-binding site.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Ribbon diagrams of the nucleotide-free scallop S1
structure in near-rigor, transition, and detached states,
oriented such that the lower 50-kDa subdomains of these three
structures superimpose. An arrow indicates the approximate
direction of the actin filament axis relative to this subdomain,
deduced from electron microscope studies (13, 16). The light
chains bound to the heavy-chain helix of the lever arm in these
three structures are omitted for clarity. Large differences are
found in the position of the converter and result from
relatively small rearrangements of the other three subdomains of
the MD (not shown). In the three scallop S1 structures, the
heavy-chain helix is straight at the junction between the
converter and the lever arm, and the interactions at the
interface between the converter and the ELC seem to be conserved.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Secondary reference #1
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Atomic structure of scallop myosin subfragment s1 complexed with mgadp: a novel conformation of the myosin head.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
A.Houdusse,
V.N.Kalabokis,
D.Himmel,
A.G.Szent-Györgyi,
C.Cohen.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Cell, 1999,
97,
459-470.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. The ELC/Converter Interactions Modulate the
Position of the Lever ArmDifferent positions of the converter in
the three states result in major movements of the lever arm (see
Figure 1 and Figure 2). This diagram illustrates how the
converter and the ELC interact differently in chicken S1 (A),
scallop S1 complexed with MgADP (B), and smooth MDE–AlF[4]^−
(C). In this view, the converter (green) and the HP helix
(yellow) appear to be in similar positions. Note that
differences in the interactions between the C-terminal lobe of
the ELC (pink) and the motor domain in these structures result
in different bending of the heavy chain helix (cyan) after the
first three turns (green) that are part of the converter.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. The Relay Controls the Position of the Converter to
which It Is Linked by Strong Conserved InteractionsRibbon
diagram of the interface between the relay (yellow) and the
converter (β sheet and last helix in green) in chicken S1 (A),
scallop S1 complexed with MgADP (B), and smooth MDE–AlF[4]^−
(C) oriented so that the converters superimpose. Note that the
orientation of the last three turns of the HP helix (yellow) is
similar in all these structures, since three glutamate residues
of this helix (brown) interact with residues of the converter
(cyan) in all three states. In contrast, the conformation of the
loop of the relay (yellow) is very different and is most rigid
in (C) where it interacts with the SH1 helix (red).
Conformational changes at both ends of the relay allow the
orientation of the lower 50 kDa subdomain (white, HP and HQ
helices) to differ with respect to that of the converter in
these three states. Note also how the environment around the
tryptophane residue (blue) of the relay varies in the three
states.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reproduced from the cited reference
with permission from Cell Press
|
 |
|
Secondary reference #2
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Structure of the regulatory domain of scallop myosin at 2 a resolution: implications for regulation.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
A.Houdusse,
C.Cohen.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Structure, 1996,
4,
21-32.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Stereo diagram of the complex between apo-CaM and
an IQ motif peptide. Two views are shown which are related by a
90° rotation about the horizontal axis. The helical IQ motif
peptide (black, residues Arg654-Ser686) is bent around residue
Tyr675. The N-terminal lobe of CaM (domain I in red, domain II
in yellow) adopts a closed conformation. The C-terminal lobe of
CaM (domain III in cyan, domain IV in blue) adopts a semi-open
conformation. The complex has a rather elongated shape; apo-CaM
forms a channel which surrounds the middle portion of the
peptide. On the other side of the interlobe linker (green),
interactions occur between the two lobes of CaM. Among these
linkages two hydrogen bonds are made across the peptide helix
between the sidechain of residue Glu114 (in ball-and-stick
representation) in linker 3 (purple) and backbone nitrogens of
Glu45 and Ala46 (blue balls) of linker 1.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figure is
reproduced from the cited reference
with permission from Cell Press
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |