 |
PDBsum entry 1cmz
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signaling protein regulation
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1cmz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
291:927-939
(1999)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Solution structure of human GAIP (Galpha interacting protein): a regulator of G protein signaling.
|
|
E.de Alba,
L.De Vries,
M.G.Farquhar,
N.Tjandra.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The solution structure of the human protein GAIP (Galpha interacting protein), a
regulator of G protein signaling, has been determined by NMR techniques. Dipolar
couplings of the oriented protein in two different liquid crystal media have
been used in the structure calculation. The solution structure of GAIP is
compared to the crystal structure of an homologous protein from rat (RGS4)
complexed to the alpha-subunit of a G protein. Some of RGS4 residues involved in
the Galpha-RGS binding interface have similar orientations in GAIP (free form),
indicating that upon binding these residues do not suffer conformational
rearrangements, and therefore, their role does not seem to be restricted to
Galpha interaction but also to RGS folding and stability. We suggest that other
structural differences between the two proteins may be related to the process of
binding as well as to a distinct efficiency in their respective GTPase
activating function.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Ribbon diagram of the backbone of the minimized
average structure. Helices are Roman- numbered. Figure 3, Figure
4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 have been generated
using the program MOLMOL [Koradi et al 1996].
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Comparison between RGS4 and GAIP conformation of
residues known to be important for the Gα interaction. GAIP and
RGS4 residues are colored red and blue, respectively. Residue
type and number are indicated.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(1999,
291,
927-939)
copyright 1999.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
P.Maurice,
A.M.Daulat,
R.Turecek,
K.Ivankova-Susankova,
F.Zamponi,
M.Kamal,
N.Clement,
J.L.Guillaume,
B.Bettler,
C.Galès,
P.Delagrange,
and
R.Jockers
(2010).
Molecular organization and dynamics of the melatonin MT₁ receptor/RGS20/G(i) protein complex reveal asymmetry of receptor dimers for RGS and G(i) coupling.
|
| |
EMBO J,
29,
3646-3659.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.R.Anderson,
E.Posokhova,
and
K.A.Martemyanov
(2009).
The R7 RGS protein family: multi-subunit regulators of neuronal G protein signaling.
|
| |
Cell Biochem Biophys,
54,
33-46.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Berlin,
D.P.O'Leary,
and
D.Fushman
(2009).
Improvement and analysis of computational methods for prediction of residual dipolar couplings.
|
| |
J Magn Reson,
201,
25-33.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.S.Apaydin,
V.Conitzer,
and
B.R.Donald
(2008).
Structure-based protein NMR assignments using native structural ensembles.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
40,
263-276.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Soundararajan,
F.S.Willard,
A.J.Kimple,
A.P.Turnbull,
L.J.Ball,
G.A.Schoch,
C.Gileadi,
O.Y.Fedorov,
E.F.Dowler,
V.A.Higman,
S.Q.Hutsell,
M.Sundström,
D.A.Doyle,
and
D.P.Siderovski
(2008).
Structural diversity in the RGS domain and its interaction with heterotrimeric G protein alpha-subunits.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
6457-6462.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.J.Kimple,
F.S.Willard,
P.M.Giguère,
C.A.Johnston,
V.Mocanu,
and
D.P.Siderovski
(2007).
The RGS protein inhibitor CCG-4986 is a covalent modifier of the RGS4 Galpha-interaction face.
|
| |
Biochim Biophys Acta,
1774,
1213-1220.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.X.Xie,
and
P.P.Palmer
(2007).
How regulators of G protein signaling achieve selective regulation.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
366,
349-365.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.B.Willars
(2006).
Mammalian RGS proteins: multifunctional regulators of cellular signalling.
|
| |
Semin Cell Dev Biol,
17,
363-376.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.A.Chasse,
P.Flanary,
S.C.Parnell,
N.Hao,
J.Y.Cha,
D.P.Siderovski,
and
H.G.Dohlman
(2006).
Genome-scale analysis reveals Sst2 as the principal regulator of mating pheromone signaling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
|
| |
Eukaryot Cell,
5,
330-346.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.M.Wilkie,
and
L.Kinch
(2005).
New roles for Galpha and RGS proteins: communication continues despite pulling sisters apart.
|
| |
Curr Biol,
15,
R843-R854.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.A.Higman,
J.Boyd,
L.J.Smith,
and
C.Redfield
(2004).
Asparagine and glutamine side-chain conformation in solution and crystal: a comparison for hen egg-white lysozyme using residual dipolar couplings.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
30,
327-346.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Qu,
J.T.Guo,
V.Olman,
and
Y.Xu
(2004).
Protein structure prediction using sparse dipolar coupling data.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
32,
551-561.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.G.Chen,
F.S.Willard,
J.Huang,
J.Liang,
S.A.Chasse,
A.M.Jones,
and
D.P.Siderovski
(2003).
A seven-transmembrane RGS protein that modulates plant cell proliferation.
|
| |
Science,
301,
1728-1731.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Meiler,
and
D.Baker
(2003).
Rapid protein fold determination using unassigned NMR data.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
100,
15404-15409.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Wakasugi,
T.Nakano,
and
I.Morishima
(2003).
Oxidized human neuroglobin acts as a heterotrimeric Galpha protein guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
278,
36505-36512.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Sterne-Marr,
J.J.Tesmer,
P.W.Day,
R.P.Stracquatanio,
J.A.Cilente,
K.E.O'Connor,
A.N.Pronin,
J.L.Benovic,
and
P.B.Wedegaertner
(2003).
G protein-coupled receptor Kinase 2/G alpha q/11 interaction. A novel surface on a regulator of G protein signaling homology domain for binding G alpha subunits.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
278,
6050-6058.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Chen,
W.D.Singer,
C.D.Wells,
S.R.Sprang,
and
P.C.Sternweis
(2003).
Mapping the Galpha13 binding interface of the rgRGS domain of p115RhoGEF.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
278,
9912-9919.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.R.Neubig,
and
D.P.Siderovski
(2002).
Regulators of G-protein signalling as new central nervous system drug targets.
|
| |
Nat Rev Drug Discov,
1,
187-197.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Inanobe,
S.Fujita,
Y.Makino,
K.Matsushita,
M.Ishii,
M.Chachin,
and
Y.Kurachi
(2001).
Interaction between the RGS domain of RGS4 with G protein alpha subunits mediates the voltage-dependent relaxation of the G protein-gated potassium channel.
|
| |
J Physiol,
535,
133-143.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Sondek,
and
D.P.Siderovski
(2001).
Ggamma-like (GGL) domains: new frontiers in G-protein signaling and beta-propeller scaffolding.
|
| |
Biochem Pharmacol,
61,
1329-1337.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.L.Longenecker,
M.E.Lewis,
H.Chikumi,
J.S.Gutkind,
and
Z.S.Derewenda
(2001).
Structure of the RGS-like domain from PDZ-RhoGEF: linking heterotrimeric g protein-coupled signaling to Rho GTPases.
|
| |
Structure,
9,
559-569.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Chen,
C.D.Wells,
P.C.Sternweis,
and
S.R.Sprang
(2001).
Structure of the rgRGS domain of p115RhoGEF.
|
| |
Nat Struct Biol,
8,
805-809.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.M.Ross,
and
T.M.Wilkie
(2000).
GTPase-activating proteins for heterotrimeric G proteins: regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) and RGS-like proteins.
|
| |
Annu Rev Biochem,
69,
795-827.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.E.Spink,
P.Polakis,
and
W.I.Weis
(2000).
Structural basis of the Axin-adenomatous polyposis coli interaction.
|
| |
EMBO J,
19,
2270-2279.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.De Vries,
B.Zheng,
T.Fischer,
E.Elenko,
and
M.G.Farquhar
(2000).
The regulator of G protein signaling family.
|
| |
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol,
40,
235-271.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.A.Burchett
(2000).
Regulators of G protein signaling: a bestiary of modular protein binding domains.
|
| |
J Neurochem,
75,
1335-1351.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Tjandra
(1999).
Establishing a degree of order: obtaining high-resolution NMR structures from molecular alignment.
|
| |
Structure,
7,
R205-R211.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |