 |
PDBsum entry 1ppp
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrolase(sulfhydryl proteinase)
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1ppp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.3.4.22.2
- papain.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
Hydrolysis of proteins with broad specificity for peptide bonds, with preference for a residue bearing a large hydrophobic sidechain at the P2 position. Does not accept Val at P1'.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Biochem J
287:797-803
(1992)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Crystal structure of papain-E64-c complex. Binding diversity of E64-c to papain S2 and S3 subsites.
|
|
M.J.Kim,
D.Yamamoto,
K.Matsumoto,
M.Inoue,
T.Ishida,
H.Mizuno,
S.Sumiya,
K.Kitamura.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
In order to investigate the binding mode of E64-c (a synthetic cysteine
proteinase inhibitor) to papain at the atomic level, the crystal structure of
the complex was analysed by X-ray diffraction at 1.9 A (1 A is expressed in SI
units as 0.1 nm) resolution. The crystal has a space group P2(1)2(1)2(1) with a
= 43.37, b = 102.34 and c = 49.95 A. A total of 21,135 observed reflections were
collected from the same crystal, and 14811 unique reflections of up to 1.9 A
resolution [Fo > 3 sigma(Fo)] were used for the structure solution and
refinement. The papain structure was determined by means of the molecular
replacement method, and then the inhibitor was observed on a (2 magnitude of
Fo-magnitude of Fc) difference Fourier map. The complex structure was finally
refined to R = 19.4% including 207 solvent molecules. Although this complex
crystal (Form II) was polymorphous as compared with the previously analysed one
(Form I), the binding modes of leucine and isoamylamide moieties of E64-c were
significantly different from each other. By the calculation of accessible
surface area for each complex atom, these two different binding modes were both
shown to be tight enough to prevent the access of solvent molecules to the
papain active site. With respect to the E64-c-papain binding mode,
molecular-dynamics simulations proposed two kinds of stationary states which
were derived from the crystal structures of Forms I and II. One of these, which
corresponds to the binding mode simulated from Form I, was essentially the same
as that observed in the crystal structure, and the other was somewhat different
from the crystal structure of Form II, especially with respect to the binding of
the isoamylamide moiety with the papain S subsites. The substrate specificity
for the papain active site is discussed on the basis of the present results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
T.Ishida
(2009).
Structural studies of specific intermolecular interactions and self-aggregation of biomolecules and their application to drug design.
|
| |
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo),
57,
1309-1334.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.K.Nandi,
H.R.Bairagya,
B.P.Mukhopadhyay,
K.Sekar,
D.Sukul,
and
A.K.Bera
(2009).
Conserved water-mediated H-bonding dynamics of catalytic Asn 175 in plant thiol protease.
|
| |
J Biosci,
34,
27-34.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.P.Beavers,
M.C.Myers,
P.P.Shah,
J.E.Purvis,
S.L.Diamond,
B.S.Cooperman,
D.M.Huryn,
and
A.B.Smith
(2008).
Molecular docking of cathepsin L inhibitors in the binding site of papain.
|
| |
J Chem Inf Model,
48,
1464-1472.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Bhattacharya,
S.Ghosh,
S.Chakraborty,
A.K.Bera,
B.P.Mukhopadhayay,
I.Dey,
and
A.Banerjee
(2001).
Insight to structural subsite recognition in plant thiol protease-inhibitor complexes : understanding the basis of differential inhibition and the role of water.
|
| |
BMC Struct Biol,
1,
4.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Czaplewski,
Z.Grzonka,
M.Jaskólski,
F.Kasprzykowski,
M.Kozak,
E.Politowska,
and
J.Ciarkowski
(1999).
Binding modes of a new epoxysuccinyl-peptide inhibitor of cysteine proteases. Where and how do cysteine proteases express their selectivity?
|
| |
Biochim Biophys Acta,
1431,
290-305.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Matsumoto,
K.Mizoue,
K.Kitamura,
W.C.Tse,
C.P.Huber,
and
T.Ishida
(1999).
Structural basis of inhibition of cysteine proteases by E-64 and its derivatives.
|
| |
Biopolymers,
51,
99.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Schaschke,
I.Assfalg-Machleidt,
W.Machleidt,
D.Turk,
and
L.Moroder
(1997).
E-64 analogues as inhibitors of cathepsin B. On the role of the absolute configuration of the epoxysuccinyl group.
|
| |
Bioorg Med Chem,
5,
1789-1797.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Cygler,
J.Sivaraman,
P.Grochulski,
R.Coulombe,
A.C.Storer,
and
J.S.Mort
(1996).
Structure of rat procathepsin B: model for inhibition of cysteine protease activity by the proregion.
|
| |
Structure,
4,
405-416.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Rothe,
A.Zichner,
E.A.Auerswald,
and
J.Dodt
(1994).
Structure/function implications for the aminopeptidase specificity of aleurain.
|
| |
Eur J Biochem,
224,
559-565.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |