 |
PDBsum entry 1kgm
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Eur J Biochem
269:527-537
(2002)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Comparative structure analysis of proteinase inhibitors from the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria.
|
|
Z.Gáspári,
A.Patthy,
L.Gráf,
A.Perczel.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The solution structure of three small serine proteinase inhibitors, two natural
and one engineered protein, SGCI (Schistocerca gregaria chymotrypsin inhibitor),
SGCI[L30R, K31M] and SGTI (Schistocerca gregaria trypsin inhibitor), were
determined by homonuclear NMR-spectroscopy. The molecules exhibit different
specificities towards target proteinases, where SGCI is a good chymotrypsin
inhibitor, its mutant is a potent trypsin inhibitor, and SGTI inhibits both
proteinases weakly. Interestingly, SGTI is a much better inhibitor of insect
proteinases than of the mammalian ones used in common assays. All three
molecules have a similar fold composed from three antiparallel beta-pleated
sheets with three disulfide bridges. The proteinase binding loop has a somewhat
distinct geometry in all three peptides. Moreover, the stabilization of the
structure is different in SGCI and SGTI. Proton-deuterium exchange experiments
are indicative of a highly rigid core in SGTI but not in SGCI. We suggest that
the observed structural properties play a significant role in the specificity of
these inhibitors.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Backbone of 10 superimposed structures of SGCI
(A) and 10 superimposed structures of SGTI (B). Schematic
representation of the secondary structure elements and the
disulfide bonding pattern of SGCI (C) and SGTI (D). Residues
giving sidechain NOEs to Phe10 in SGCI (E) and the Lys10–Trp25
interaction of SGTI (F). (A), (B), (E) and (F) were prepared
with sybyl[19], (C) and (D) with molscript[38] and raster3d[39].
|
 |
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. Comparison of the H -trace of the
binding loop of SGCI (blue), PMP-C (red), the turkey ovomucoid
third domain inhibitor [ 29 ] (green) and the Bowman-Birk
inhibitor [ 30 ] (orange). Structures are superimposed between
residues P3 and P3'. This figure was prepared with sybyl[19].
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the Federation of European Biochemical Societies:
Eur J Biochem
(2002,
269,
527-537)
copyright 2002.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.F.Angyán,
B.Szappanos,
A.Perczel,
and
Z.Gáspári
(2010).
CoNSEnsX: an ensemble view of protein structures and NMR-derived experimental data.
|
| |
BMC Struct Biol,
10,
39.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Breugelmans,
G.Simonet,
V.van Hoef,
S.Van Soest,
and
J.Vanden Broeck
(2009).
Identification, distribution and molecular evolution of the pacifastin gene family in Metazoa.
|
| |
BMC Evol Biol,
9,
97.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Breugelmans,
G.Simonet,
V.van Hoef,
I.Claeys,
S.Van Soest,
and
J.Vanden Broeck
(2008).
Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of pacifastin-related precursor transcripts during the reproductive cycle of solitarious and gregarious desert locusts.
|
| |
Insect Mol Biol,
17,
137-145.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Leone,
A.Roussel,
and
C.Kellenberger
(2008).
Structure of Locusta migratoria protease inhibitor 3 (LMPI-3) in complex with Fusarium oxysporum trypsin.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
64,
1165-1171.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Gáspári,
B.Szenthe,
A.Patthy,
W.M.Westler,
L.Gráf,
and
A.Perczel
(2006).
Local binding with globally distributed changes in a small protease inhibitor upon enzyme binding.
|
| |
FEBS J,
273,
1831-1842.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Perczel,
Z.Gáspári,
and
I.G.Csizmadia
(2005).
Structure and stability of beta-pleated sheets.
|
| |
J Comput Chem,
26,
1155-1168.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Mucsi,
A.Perczel,
and
G.Orosz
(2002).
Engineering new peptidic inhibitors from a natural chymotrypsin inhibitor.
|
| |
J Pept Sci,
8,
643-655.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |