 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription/DNA
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
6gat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent
|
1 term
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
transcription factor activity
|
3 terms
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
277:621-634
(1998)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The solution structure of the Leu22-->Val mutant AREA DNA binding domain complexed with a TGATAG core element defines a role for hydrophobic packing in the determination of specificity.
|
|
M.R.Starich,
M.Wikström,
S.Schumacher,
H.N.Arst,
A.M.Gronenborn,
G.M.Clore.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The seemingly innocuous leucine-to-valine mutation at position 22 of the AREA
DNA binding domain results in dramatic changes in the in vivo expression profile
of genes controlled by this GATA transcription factor. This is associated with a
preference of the Leu22-->Val mutant for TGATAG sites over (A/C)GATAG sites.
Quantitative gel retardation assays confirm this observation and show that the
Leu22-->Val mutant AREA DNA binding domain has a approximately 30-fold lower
affinity than the wild-type domain for a 13 base-pair oligonucleotide containing
the wild-type CGATAG target. To gain insight into the measured affinity data and
further explore sequence specificity of the AREA protein, the solution structure
of a complex between the Leu22-->Val mutant AREA DNA binding domain and a 13
base-pair oligonucleotide containing its physiologically relevant TGATAG target
sequence has been determined by multidimensional nuclear magnetic resonance
spectroscopy. Comparison of this structure with that of the wild-type AREA DNA
binding domain complexed to its cognate CGATAG target site shows how subtle
changes in amino acid side-chain length and hydrophobic packing can affect
affinity and specificity for GATA-containing sequences, and how changes in DNA
sequence can be compensated for by changes in protein sequence.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Two views showing a comparison of the wtAREA (red
worm) and Leu22→Val mutAREA (gold worm) DBDs complexed to DNA.
Residues 10 to 61 of both domains are superimposed in the views
shown. The surfaces representation of only one of the DNA models
(the T GATAG site for the mutant complex) is shown for clarity.
The surfaces of the bases in the major groove are colored in
light blue while those in the minor groove are in light red.
Side-chains for the wtAREA and mutAREA DBDs are shown in blue
and green, respectively. The zinc atoms and their coordinating
ligands are shown in purple (wtAREA) and pink (mutAREA). The
coordinates of the wtAREA DBD complex are taken from [Starich et
al 1998].
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Comparison of the Leu22→Val mutAREA
DBD·T GATAG and wtAREA DBD·C GATAG complexes. A,
Superposition of the protein backbone and DNA for the wild-type
and mutant AREA DBD complexes. The protein backbones are
depicted as red (wtAREA) and gold (mutAREA) worms. Bonds between
heavy atoms of the DNA (base-pairs 3 to 11) are represented as
light red (CGATA site) or tan (TGATA site) sticks. B, Stereoview
showing protein-DNA interactions for residues at positions 22
and 24. The wtAREA DBD backbone and side-chains are shown in red
and blue, respectively, while the mutAREA DBD backbone and
side-chains are shown in gold and green, respectively. The
G3-C4-G5 element of the C GATAG site is shown in light red, and
the G3-T4-G5 element of the T GATAG site is shown in tan. Only
bonds between heavy atoms for the protein and DNA are
represented with the exception of C---H bonds for all methyl
groups shown (Leu22 δs, Val22 γs and the methyl group of T4).
The coordinates of the wtAREA DBD complex are taken from
[Starich et al 1998].
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(1998,
277,
621-634)
copyright 1998.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
X.Zhao,
S.L.Hume,
C.Johnson,
P.Thompson,
J.Huang,
J.Gray,
H.K.Lamb,
and
A.R.Hawkins
(2010).
The transcription repressor NmrA is subject to proteolysis by three Aspergillus nidulans proteases.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 19,
1405-1419.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Fufezan,
and
M.Specht
(2009).
p3d--Python module for structural bioinformatics.
|
| |
BMC Bioinformatics, 10,
258.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.R.Vonderfecht,
D.C.Schroyer,
B.L.Schenck,
V.M.McDonough,
and
M.J.Pikaart
(2008).
Substitution of DNA-contacting amino acids with functional variants in the Gata-1 zinc finger: a structurally and phylogenetically guided mutagenesis.
|
| |
Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 369,
1052-1056.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Schafmeier,
A.Diernfellner,
A.Schäfer,
O.Dintsis,
A.Neiss,
and
M.Brunner
(2008).
Circadian activity and abundance rhythms of the Neurospora clock transcription factor WCC associated with rapid nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling.
|
| |
Genes Dev, 22,
3397-3402.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.I.Muro-Pastor,
J.Strauss,
A.Ramón,
and
C.Scazzocchio
(2004).
A paradoxical mutant GATA factor.
|
| |
Eukaryot Cell, 3,
393-405.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Qu,
J.T.Guo,
V.Olman,
and
Y.Xu
(2004).
Protein structure prediction using sparse dipolar coupling data.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 32,
551-561.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Fukushige,
B.Goszczynski,
H.Tian,
and
J.D.McGhee
(2003).
The evolutionary duplication and probable demise of an endodermal GATA factor in Caenorhabditis elegans.
|
| |
Genetics, 165,
575-588.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.Collett,
J.C.Dunlap,
and
J.J.Loros
(2001).
Circadian clock-specific roles for the light response protein WHITE COLLAR-2.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol, 21,
2619-2628.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.E.Maxon,
and
I.Herskowitz
(2001).
Ash1p is a site-specific DNA-binding protein that actively represses transcription.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 98,
1495-1500.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Scazzocchio
(2000).
The fungal GATA factors.
|
| |
Curr Opin Microbiol, 3,
126-131.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Klein,
M.F.Brin,
P.Kramer,
M.Sena-Esteves,
D.de Leon,
D.Doheny,
S.Bressman,
S.Fahn,
X.O.Breakefield,
and
L.J.Ozelius
(1999).
Association of a missense change in the D2 dopamine receptor with myoclonus dystonia.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 96,
5173-5176.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.A.Lazar,
E.C.Johnson,
J.R.Desjarlais,
and
T.M.Handel
(1999).
Rotamer strain as a determinant of protein structural specificity.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 8,
2598-2610.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.I.Muro-Pastor,
R.Gonzalez,
J.Strauss,
F.Narendja,
and
C.Scazzocchio
(1999).
The GATA factor AreA is essential for chromatin remodelling in a eukaryotic bidirectional promoter.
|
| |
EMBO J, 18,
1584-1597.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.A.Lazar,
and
T.M.Handel
(1998).
Hydrophobic core packing and protein design.
|
| |
Curr Opin Chem Biol, 2,
675-679.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.M.Clore,
and
A.M.Gronenborn
(1998).
NMR structure determination of proteins and protein complexes larger than 20 kDa.
|
| |
Curr Opin Chem Biol, 2,
564-570.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.A.Wilson,
and
H.N.Arst
(1998).
Mutational analysis of AREA, a transcriptional activator mediating nitrogen metabolite repression in Aspergillus nidulans and a member of the "streetwise" GATA family of transcription factors.
|
| |
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 62,
586-596.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
|