 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RNA/RNA binding protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
3k64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
binding
|
2 terms
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
106:20186-20191
(2009)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural basis for specific recognition of multiple mRNA targets by a PUF regulatory protein.
|
|
Y.Wang,
L.Opperman,
M.Wickens,
T.M.Hall.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Caenorhabditis elegans fem-3 binding factor (FBF) is a founding member of the
PUMILIO/FBF (PUF) family of mRNA regulatory proteins. It regulates multiple
mRNAs critical for stem cell maintenance and germline development. Here, we
report crystal structures of FBF in complex with 6 different 9-nt RNA sequences,
including elements from 4 natural mRNAs. These structures reveal that FBF binds
to conserved bases at positions 1-3 and 7-8. The key specificity determinant of
FBF vs. other PUF proteins lies in positions 4-6. In FBF/RNA complexes, these
bases stack directly with one another and turn away from the RNA-binding
surface. A short region of FBF is sufficient to impart its unique specificity
and lies directly opposite the flipped bases. We suggest that this region
imposes a flattened curvature on the protein; hence, the requirement for the
additional nucleotide. The principles of FBF/RNA recognition suggest a general
mechanism by which PUF proteins recognize distinct families of RNAs yet exploit
very nearly identical atomic contacts in doing so.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Three classes of RNA conformation in FBF-2 target RNAs.
Interaction of FBF-2 repeats 4–6 with gld-1 FBEa (A), fem-3
PME (B), and gld-1 FBEa G4A mutant (C) RNAs are shown. Dashed
lines indicate interacting atoms. Water molecules that mediate
interactions are shown as red spheres. (D) Superposition of the
RNA-interacting side chains of FBF-2 repeats 4–6 and gld-1
FBEa (gray), fem-3 PME (tan), and gld-1 FBEa G4A mutant (pale
cyan) RNAs (rmsd of 0.15 Å over 130 CA atoms between PME
and FBEa and rmsd of 0.28 Å over 130 CA atoms between PME
and FBEa G4A mutant).
|
 |
Figure 6.
Conservation and adaptation of PUF protein–RNA
interactions. Schematic representations of interactions between
PUF proteins and their RNA targets. Interactions and RNA base
conformations unique to each protein are indicated by color:
FBF-2 (red), PUM1 (gold), Puf4p (green), and Puf3p (orange).
|
 |
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
G.Lu,
and
T.M.Hall
(2011).
Alternate modes of cognate RNA recognition by human PUMILIO proteins.
|
| |
Structure, 19,
361-367.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.P.Mackay,
J.Font,
and
D.J.Segal
(2011).
The prospects for designer single-stranded RNA-binding proteins.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol, 18,
256-261.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.P.Ryder
(2011).
Pumilio RNA recognition: the consequence of promiscuity.
|
| |
Structure, 19,
277-279.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Quenault,
T.Lithgow,
and
A.Traven
(2011).
PUF proteins: repression, activation and mRNA localization.
|
| |
Trends Cell Biol, 21,
104-112.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Kazan,
D.Ray,
E.T.Chan,
T.R.Hughes,
and
Q.Morris
(2010).
RNAcontext: a new method for learning the sequence and structure binding preferences of RNA-binding proteins.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol, 6,
e1000832.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.J.Chritton,
and
M.Wickens
(2010).
Translational repression by PUF proteins in vitro.
|
| |
RNA, 16,
1217-1225.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Zhu,
C.R.Stumpf,
J.M.Krahn,
M.Wickens,
and
T.M.Hall
(2009).
A 5' cytosine binding pocket in Puf3p specifies regulation of mitochondrial mRNAs.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106,
20192-20197.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
|