|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Oxidoreductase/transcription
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Phd2:mn:nog:hif1-alpha substrate complex
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Egl nine homolog 1. Chain: a. Fragment: phd2 catalytic domain, residues 181-426. Synonym: prolyl hydroxylase, hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase 2, hif-prolyl hydroxylase 2, hif-ph2, hph-2, prolyl hydroxylase domain-containing protein 2, phd2, sm-20. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes.
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: phd2. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 469008. Synthetic: yes. Other_details: peptide synthesis
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.00Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.234
|
R-free:
|
0.248
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
R.Chowdhury,M.A.Mcdonough,C.J.Schofield
|
Key ref:
|
 |
R.Chowdhury
et al.
(2009).
Structural basis for binding of hypoxia-inducible factor to the oxygen-sensing prolyl hydroxylases.
Structure,
17,
981-989.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
08-Jun-09
|
Release date:
|
28-Jul-09
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
Chain A:
E.C.1.14.11.29
- Hypoxia-inducible factor-proline dioxygenase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
Hypoxia-inducible factor-L-proline + 2-oxoglutarate + O2 = hypoxia- inducible factor-trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline + succinate + CO2
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Hypoxia-inducible factor-L-proline
|
+
|
2-oxoglutarate
|
+
|
O(2)
|
=
|
hypoxia- inducible factor-trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline
|
+
|
succinate
|
+
|
CO(2)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Cofactor:
|
 |
Iron; L-ascorbate
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Iron
|
L-ascorbate
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the
KEGG ftp site
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
oxidation-reduction process
|
1 term
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
oxidoreductase activity
|
5 terms
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Structure
17:981-989
(2009)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural basis for binding of hypoxia-inducible factor to the oxygen-sensing prolyl hydroxylases.
|
|
R.Chowdhury,
M.A.McDonough,
J.Mecinović,
C.Loenarz,
E.Flashman,
K.S.Hewitson,
C.Domene,
C.J.Schofield.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The oxygen-dependent hydroxylation of proline residues in the alpha subunit of
hypoxia-inducible transcription factor (HIFalpha) is central to the hypoxic
response in animals. Prolyl hydroxylation of HIFalpha increases its binding to
the von Hippel-Lindau protein (pVHL), so signaling for degradation via the
ubiquitin-proteasome system. The HIF prolyl hydroxylases (PHDs, prolyl
hydroxylase domain enzymes) are related to the collagen prolyl hydroxylases, but
form unusually stable complexes with their Fe(II) cofactor and 2-oxoglutarate
cosubstrate. We report crystal structures of the catalytic domain of PHD2, the
most important of the human PHDs, in complex with the C-terminal
oxygen-dependent degradation domain of HIF-1alpha. Together with biochemical
analyses, the results reveal that PHD catalysis involves a mobile region that
isolates the hydroxylation site and stabilizes the PHD2.Fe(II).2OG complex. The
results will be of use in the design of PHD inhibitors aimed at treating anemia
and ischemic disease.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Conformational Changes in PHD2 Catalysis and Effect
of PHD2 Variations on Activity and Selectivity (A) Stereo
view ribbons representation of the tPHD2.CODD complex structure.
The tPHD2 fold comprises four α helices and ten β strands of
which eight form a double-stranded β helix (DSBH, dark blue)
(McDonough et al., 2006). Three of the four α helices (α1,
α2, and α3) pack along the major β sheet and stabilize the
DSBH. (B) Stereo view ribbons representation of the
tPHD2.CODD complex structure (green) superimposed with
tPHD2.Fe(II).A structure (cyan) showing structural differences
in the β2β3/loop (PHD2[237-254]) and C-terminal α4-helix
conformations. (C) Bicyclic inhibitors, such as A (salmon)
disrupt the Arg-252:Asp-254 salt-bridge observed in the closed
substrate binding conformation (P2[1]2[1]2[1]); they also
apparently cause rotation of Tyr-310 C[β]-C[γ] (by vert,
similar 45°) relative to that observed in the P6[3] form
(not shown). Distances for selected salt bridges are given in
angstroms. (D) The tPHD2.CODD complex showing mutation
sites (highlighted in white). (E) 2OG turnover activity of
wild-type (wt) and variant tPHD2 using NODD (blue) and CODD
(red) substrates. 2OG turnover in absence of substrate was
subtracted. Errors are standard deviations (n ≥ 3). (F)
Substrate hydroxylation and selectivity of wt and variant tPHD2
as determined by MALDI-TOF MS using CODD and NODD substrates.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. The Binding of Proline/Hydroxyproline Residues to
PHD2 and VCB (A and B) Comparisons of the Pro-564[CODD]
conformations when bound to tPHD2 (A, green) and VCB (B, wheat).
Superimposition of CODD (yellow)/ CODD[Hyp564] (purple) in
complex with tPHD2 /VCB yielded rmsd of 2.6 Å for 14
residues (561–574, Cα atoms). The Pro-564[CODD] C^4-methylene
is in the endo conformation when bound to tPHD2 and the exo
conformation when Hyp-564[CODD] is bound to the VCB complex. The
C^4 Pro-564 hydrogen(s) are modeled in black. (C) Stereo
view of coordination at the PHD2 (green) and the FIH (blue)
active site; note the alternative position of the NOG
1-carboxylate. In the PHD2 structure, NOG (orange) chelates the
metal via one of its carboxylate oxygens (O-Mn[II]; 2.4 Å;
trans to His-374 N epsilon
2 (N2-Mn[II]; 1.9 Å) and its amide α-carbonyl oxygen
(Oα-Mn(II); 2.1 Å; vert,
similar trans to Asp-315 Oδ1; 2.0 Å). The metal-ligated
water (in red) is positioned trans to His-313 (N epsilon
2-Mn[II]; 2.0 Å; H[2]O-Mn[II], 2.2 Å) and is
positioned to hydrogen bond with Asp-315 Oδ2 (Oδ2-water; 2.4
Å).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Structure
(2009,
17,
981-989)
copyright 2009.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.Thalhammer,
J.Mecinović,
C.Loenarz,
A.Tumber,
N.R.Rose,
T.D.Heightman,
and
C.J.Schofield
(2011).
Inhibition of the histone demethylase JMJD2E by 3-substituted pyridine 2,4-dicarboxylates.
|
| |
Org Biomol Chem, 9,
127-135.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Loenarz,
and
C.J.Schofield
(2011).
Physiological and biochemical aspects of hydroxylations and demethylations catalyzed by human 2-oxoglutarate oxygenases.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci, 36,
7.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Loenarz,
M.L.Coleman,
A.Boleininger,
B.Schierwater,
P.W.Holland,
P.J.Ratcliffe,
and
C.J.Schofield
(2011).
The hypoxia-inducible transcription factor pathway regulates oxygen sensing in the simplest animal, Trichoplax adhaerens.
|
| |
EMBO Rep, 12,
63-70.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Astuti,
C.J.Ricketts,
R.Chowdhury,
M.A.McDonough,
D.Gentle,
G.Kirby,
S.Schlisio,
R.S.Kenchappa,
B.D.Carter,
W.G.Kaelin,
P.J.Ratcliffe,
C.J.Schofield,
F.Latif,
and
E.R.Maher
(2011).
Mutation analysis of HIF prolyl hydroxylases (PHD/EGLN) in individuals with features of phaeochromocytoma and renal cell carcinoma susceptibility.
|
| |
Endocr Relat Cancer, 18,
73-83.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Rotili,
M.Altun,
R.B.Hamed,
C.Loenarz,
A.Thalhammer,
R.J.Hopkinson,
Y.M.Tian,
P.J.Ratcliffe,
A.Mai,
B.M.Kessler,
and
C.J.Schofield
(2011).
Photoactivable peptides for identifying enzyme-substrate and protein-protein interactions.
|
| |
Chem Commun (Camb), 47,
1488-1490.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.S.Lee,
and
M.J.Percy
(2011).
The HIF pathway and erythrocytosis.
|
| |
Annu Rev Pathol, 6,
165-192.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Chowdhury,
K.K.Yeoh,
Y.M.Tian,
L.Hillringhaus,
E.A.Bagg,
N.R.Rose,
I.K.Leung,
X.S.Li,
E.C.Woon,
M.Yang,
M.A.McDonough,
O.N.King,
I.J.Clifton,
R.J.Klose,
T.D.Claridge,
P.J.Ratcliffe,
C.J.Schofield,
and
A.Kawamura
(2011).
The oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate inhibits histone lysine demethylases.
|
| |
EMBO Rep, 12,
463-469.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Flashman,
L.M.Hoffart,
R.B.Hamed,
J.M.Bollinger,
C.Krebs,
and
C.J.Schofield
(2010).
Evidence for the slow reaction of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase 2 with oxygen.
|
| |
FEBS J, 277,
4089-4099.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Flashman,
S.L.Davies,
K.K.Yeoh,
and
C.J.Schofield
(2010).
Investigating the dependence of the hypoxia-inducible factor hydroxylases (factor inhibiting HIF and prolyl hydroxylase domain 2) on ascorbate and other reducing agents.
|
| |
Biochem J, 427,
135-142.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.L.Gorres,
and
R.T.Raines
(2010).
Prolyl 4-hydroxylase.
|
| |
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol, 45,
106-124.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.L.Hu,
S.Niu,
T.Huang,
K.Wang,
X.H.Shi,
and
Y.D.Cai
(2010).
Prediction and analysis of protein hydroxyproline and hydroxylysine.
|
| |
PLoS One, 5,
e15917.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.A.Smirnova,
I.Rakhman,
N.Moroz,
M.Basso,
J.Payappilly,
S.Kazakov,
F.Hernandez-Guzman,
I.N.Gaisina,
A.P.Kozikowski,
R.R.Ratan,
and
I.G.Gazaryan
(2010).
Utilization of an in vivo reporter for high throughput identification of branched small molecule regulators of hypoxic adaptation.
|
| |
Chem Biol, 17,
380-391.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.R.Rose,
E.C.Woon,
G.L.Kingham,
O.N.King,
J.Mecinović,
I.J.Clifton,
S.S.Ng,
J.Talib-Hardy,
U.Oppermann,
M.A.McDonough,
and
C.J.Schofield
(2010).
Selective inhibitors of the JMJD2 histone demethylases: combined nondenaturing mass spectrometric screening and crystallographic approaches.
|
| |
J Med Chem, 53,
1810-1818.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.van Wijk,
S.Sutherland,
A.C.Van Wesel,
E.G.Huizinga,
M.J.Percy,
M.Bierings,
and
F.S.Lee
(2010).
Erythrocytosis associated with a novel missense mutation in the HIF2A gene.
|
| |
Haematologica, 95,
829-832.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.D.Bugg
(2009).
Oxygenases get to grips with polypeptides.
|
| |
Structure, 17,
913-914.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
|