 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription/DNA
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
3dfv
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent
|
1 term
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
transcription factor activity
|
3 terms
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
381:1292-1306
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Crystal structures of multiple GATA zinc fingers bound to DNA reveal new insights into DNA recognition and self-association by GATA.
|
|
D.L.Bates,
Y.Chen,
G.Kim,
L.Guo,
L.Chen.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The GATA family of transcription factors (GATA1-6) binds selected GATA sites in
vertebrate genomes to regulate specific gene expression. Although vertebrate
GATA factors have two highly conserved zinc finger motifs, how the two fingers
act together to recognize functional DNA elements is not well understood. Here
we determined the crystal structures of the C-terminal zinc finger of mouse
GATA3 bound to DNA containing two variously arranged GATA binding sites. Our
structures and accompanying biochemical analyses reveal two distinct modes of
DNA binding by GATA to closely arranged sites. One mode involves cooperative
binding by two GATA factors that interact with each other through
protein-protein interactions. The other involves simultaneous binding of the
N-terminal zinc finger (N-finger) and the C-terminal zinc finger of the same
GATA factor. Our studies represent the first crystallographic analysis of GATA
zinc fingers bound to DNA and provide new insights into the DNA recognition
mechanism by the GATA zinc finger. Our crystal structure also reveals a
dimerization interface in GATA that has previously been shown to be important
for GATA self-association. These findings significantly advance our
understanding of the structure and function of GATA and provide an important
framework for further investigating the in vivo mechanisms of GATA-dependent
gene regulation.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Structural basis of GATA3 C-finger dimerization. (a)
Surface model of the GATA3 C-finger dimer bound to the ADJ DNA
showing the extended protein/DNA and protein–protein
interaction interfaces. The transparent surfaces are colored
according to the underling ribbon/stick/atom model. The
orientation is similar to that of Fig. 1b. (b) Detailed view of
the main dimerization interface formed by the NRPL motif. Here
Pro353 and Thr355 engage in extensive van der Waals contacts,
while Arg352 interacts with the DNA backbone to stabilize the
conformation of the NRPL motif. Several contacts are indicated
by dashed lines to give a distance scale. (c) Close contacts
between the C-terminal basic tail of one zinc finger in
alternative conformation (cyan) with the recognition helix of
another zinc finger bound to the adjacent major groove.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Fig. 5. Diverse modes of DNA binding to different double-GATA
sites by GATA factors. A model of GATA3 DF is built wherein the
N-finger (green) is constructed by homology modeling based on
the crystal structure of the C-finger (purple). The linker
region is assumed to be flexible and may adopt different
conformations depending on the arrangement of the double-GATA
sites. (a) Model of GATA3 DF bound to double-GATA site
resembling the ADJ DNA. (b) Model of GATA3 DF bound to the
GATA/GATC composite site (OPP A–C) DNA or palindromic
double-GATA site at low protein concentrations. (c) Model of
GATA3 DF bound to palindromic double-GATA site at high protein
concentrations. The three models were constructed based on EMSA
data of Fig. 4 and were meant to interpret the specific DNA
binding interactions by the N-finger and the C-finger on
different probes and under different conditions. The
conformation of the linker region, and whether the N-finger
interacts with the C-finger or DNA nonspecifically in (a) and
(c), cannot be determined with current data and are therefore
hypothetical in the figure.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2008,
381,
1292-1306)
copyright 2008.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
M.Ohta,
M.Eguchi-Ishimae,
M.Ohshima,
H.Iwabuki,
K.Takemoto,
K.Murao,
T.Chisaka,
E.Yamamoto,
T.Higaki,
K.Isoyama,
M.Eguchi,
and
E.Ishii
(2011).
Novel dominant-negative mutant of GATA3 in HDR syndrome.
|
| |
J Mol Med, 89,
43-50.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.W.Shen,
D.F.Heiter,
S.H.Chan,
H.Wang,
S.Y.Xu,
R.D.Morgan,
G.G.Wilson,
and
B.L.Stoddard
(2010).
Unusual target site disruption by the rare-cutting HNH restriction endonuclease PacI.
|
| |
Structure, 18,
734-743.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Chou,
S.Provot,
and
Z.Werb
(2010).
GATA3 in development and cancer differentiation: cells GATA have it!
|
| |
J Cell Physiol, 222,
42-49.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.S.Leung,
K.C.Wong,
T.M.Chan,
M.H.Wong,
K.H.Lee,
C.K.Lau,
and
S.K.Tsui
(2010).
Discovering protein-DNA binding sequence patterns using association rule mining.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 38,
6324-6337.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.C.Ho,
T.S.Tai,
and
S.Y.Pai
(2009).
GATA3 and the T-cell lineage: essential functions before and after T-helper-2-cell differentiation.
|
| |
Nat Rev Immunol, 9,
125-135.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.A.Lowry,
R.Gamsjaeger,
S.Y.Thong,
W.Hung,
A.H.Kwan,
G.Broitman-Maduro,
J.M.Matthews,
M.Maduro,
and
J.P.Mackay
(2009).
Structural Analysis of MED-1 Reveals Unexpected Diversity in the Mechanism of DNA Recognition by GATA-type Zinc Finger Domains.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 284,
5827-5835.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Kodo,
T.Nishizawa,
M.Furutani,
S.Arai,
E.Yamamura,
K.Joo,
T.Takahashi,
R.Matsuoka,
and
H.Yamagishi
(2009).
GATA6 mutations cause human cardiac outflow tract defects by disrupting semaphorin-plexin signaling.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106,
13933-13938.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
|