 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Protein-binding
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2vlq
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Protein-binding
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
F86a mutant of e9 dnase domain in complex with im9
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Colicin-e9 immunity protein. Chain: a. Synonym: imme9, microcin-e9 immunity protein. Engineered: yes. Colicin e9. Chain: b. Fragment: dnase domain, residues 450-582. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Escherichia coli. Organism_taxid: 562. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562. Expression_system_taxid: 562
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
1.60Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.166
|
R-free:
|
0.199
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
A.H.Keeble,L.A.Joachimiak,M.J.Mate,N.Meenan,N.Kirkpatrick, D.Baker,C.Kleanthous
|
Key ref:
|
 |
A.H.Keeble
et al.
(2008).
Experimental and computational analyses of the energetic basis for dual recognition of immunity proteins by colicin endonucleases.
J Mol Biol,
379,
745-759.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
15-Jan-08
|
Release date:
|
20-May-08
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
cytolysis
|
4 terms
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
protein binding
|
4 terms
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
379:745-759
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Experimental and computational analyses of the energetic basis for dual recognition of immunity proteins by colicin endonucleases.
|
|
A.H.Keeble,
L.A.Joachimiak,
M.J.Maté,
N.Meenan,
N.Kirkpatrick,
D.Baker,
C.Kleanthous.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Colicin endonucleases (DNases) are bound and inactivated by immunity (Im)
proteins. Im proteins are broadly cross-reactive yet specific inhibitors binding
cognate and non-cognate DNases with K(d) values that vary between 10(-4) and
10(-14) M, characteristics that are explained by a 'dual-recognition' mechanism.
In this work, we addressed for the first time the energetics of Im protein
recognition by colicin DNases through a combination of E9 DNase alanine scanning
and double-mutant cycles (DMCs) coupled with kinetic and calorimetric analyses
of cognate Im9 and non-cognate Im2 binding, as well as computational analysis of
alanine scanning and DMC data. We show that differential DeltaDeltaGs observed
for four E9 DNase residues cumulatively distinguish cognate Im9 association from
non-cognate Im2 association. E9 DNase Phe86 is the primary specificity hotspot
residue in the centre of the interface, which is coordinated by conserved and
variable hotspot residues of the cognate Im protein. Experimental DMC analysis
reveals that only modest coupling energies to Im9 residues are observed, in
agreement with calculated DMCs using the program ROSETTA and consistent with the
largely hydrophobic nature of E9 DNase-Im9 specificity contacts. Computed values
for the 12 E9 DNase alanine mutants showed reasonable agreement with
experimental DeltaDeltaG data, particularly for interactions not mediated by
interfacial water molecules. DeltaDeltaG predictions for residues that contact
buried water molecules calculated using solvated rotamer models met with mixed
success; however, we were able to predict with a high degree of accuracy the
location and energetic contribution of one such contact. Our study highlights
how colicin DNases are able to utilise both conserved and variable amino acids
to distinguish cognate from non-cognate Im proteins, with the energetic
contributions of the conserved residues modulated by neighbouring specificity
sites.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Fig. 2. The conserved hotspot of Im9 meets the variable
hotspot of the E9 DNase. Molecular surface representation of the
E9 DNase, coloured according to values of ΔΔG for alanine
mutants, in the context of the complex with Im9 (Table 1). Only
two of the four helices of Im9 are shown for simplicity. Colour
code for values of ΔΔG[kin]^obs: yellow, 2–4 kcal/mol;
green, 1–2 kcal/mol; blue, < 1 kcal/mol. With the exception of
Arg54 and Asn75, the surface of the IPE is largely variable in
the DNase family. By contrast, the three Im9 residues of helix
III (shown as ribbon), Asp51, Tyr54 and Tyr55, are all conserved
(underlined in the figure). Wallis et al.^17 showed previously
that mutation of these residues to alanine generates much
greater values of ΔΔG (> 5 kcal/mol). The docking of helix III
into the concave cleft of the DNase IPE positions the
specificity helix of the Im protein for the appropriate
recognition of residue 86 on the DNase and to make additional
specificity contacts, such as with Lys97. The correct
positioning of helix II is thought to be through rotation about
the conserved hotspot of the Im protein in the encounter
complex, possibly mediated by three conserved water molecules,
shown as red spheres in the figure.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Fig. 5. Crystal structures of E9 DNase alanine mutants in
complex with Im9. See Table 3 for details of refinement
statistics. (a) E9 DNase F86A. (b) E9 DNase N75A. (c) E9 DNase
K97A. (d) E9 DNase R54A. See the text for details of the
structural changes in the immediate vicinity of each mutation
and the changes in bound water. All mutant structures (green,
with additional water molecules shown in red) are overlaid with
the wild-type structure (gray).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2008,
379,
745-759)
copyright 2008.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
C.Pons,
A.Solernou,
L.Perez-Cano,
S.Grosdidier,
and
J.Fernandez-Recio
(2010).
Optimization of pyDock for the new CAPRI challenges: Docking of homology-based models, domain-domain assembly and protein-RNA binding.
|
| |
Proteins, 78,
3182-3188.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Janin
(2010).
The targets of CAPRI Rounds 13-19.
|
| |
Proteins, 78,
3067-3072.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Eisenstein,
A.Ben-Shimon,
Z.Frankenstein,
and
N.Kowalsman
(2010).
CAPRI targets T29-T42: proving ground for new docking procedures.
|
| |
Proteins, 78,
3174-3181.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.A.Meenan,
A.Sharma,
S.J.Fleishman,
C.J.Macdonald,
B.Morel,
R.Boetzel,
G.R.Moore,
D.Baker,
and
C.Kleanthous
(2010).
The structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107,
10080-10085.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
O.N.Demerdash,
A.Buyan,
and
J.C.Mitchell
(2010).
ReplicOpter: a replicate optimizer for flexible docking.
|
| |
Proteins, 78,
3156-3165.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.J.Falconer,
A.Penkova,
I.Jelesarov,
and
B.M.Collins
(2010).
Survey of the year 2008: applications of isothermal titration calorimetry.
|
| |
J Mol Recognit, 23,
395-413.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
| |