|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
DNA recombination
|
1 term
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
recombinase activity
|
2 terms
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Structure
2:371-384
(1994)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Refinement of gamma delta resolvase reveals a strikingly flexible molecule.
|
|
P.A.Rice,
T.A.Steitz.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
BACKGROUND: gamma delta resolvase is a 20.5 kDa enzyme that catalyzes a
site-specific recombination in the second step of the transposition of the gamma
delta transposon and requires no cofactors other than Mg2+ for activity. Dimers
of resolvase bind cooperatively to DNA at three inverted repeat sequences of
differing geometry but catalyze recombination at only one site. RESULTS: The
structure of the catalytic domain of gamma delta resolvase, which provides the
protein-protein interactions in the synaptic complex, has been refined to an
R-factor of 20% at 2.3 A resolution. The structures of the three independent
monomers in the asymmetric unit are similar but not identical. Differences occur
in the positions of surface loops and in the overall twist of the central
beta-sheet of the molecule. The crystal also gives two independent structures
for the dimeric form of the molecule, which also show significant differences in
the relative orientations of their subunits. CONCLUSION: Resolvase is an
unusually flexible protein. This conformational adaptability may be necessary to
allow each of the 12 resolvase subunits in the synaptic complex to play a
different but specific role in wrapping DNA, binding sites of differing geometry
and catalyzing recombination.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 8.
Figure 8. Superpositions of monomers 1 and 2 (stereo view). (a)
Monomer 1 (blue) is shown superimposed on monomer 2 (green) by
a least squares procedure using the α-carbons of helices A and
B as guides. Due to a difference in the overall twist of the
central β -sheet, the superposition becomes increasingly poor
towards the carboxy-terminal portion of the molecule. (The extra
long Cα–Cα bond in monomer 1 is between residues 37 and 45,
as the turn consisting of residues 38–44 is disordered in
this monomer.) (b) Monomer 1 superimposed on monomer 2 using
the α-carbons of helices D and E as guides. This placement of
monomer 1 differs from the one in part (a) by a rotation of
10.5°. Figure 8. Superpositions of monomers 1 and 2
(stereo view). (a) Monomer 1 (blue) is shown superimposed on
monomer 2 (green) by a least squares procedure using the
α-carbons of helices A and B as guides. Due to a difference in
the overall twist of the central β -sheet, the superposition
becomes increasingly poor towards the carboxy-terminal portion
of the molecule. (The extra long Cα–Cα bond in monomer 1 is
between residues 37 and 45, as the turn consisting of residues
38–44 is disordered in this monomer.) (b) Monomer 1
superimposed on monomer 2 using the α-carbons of helices D and
E as guides. This placement of monomer 1 differs from the one in
part (a) by a rotation of 10.5°.
|
 |
Figure 13.
Figure 13. A packing defect inside the hydrophobic core. The
structure of the cavity inside monomer 3, as defined using a 1.2
å probe radius (see text) and those side chains which
form its boundaries are shown. A very similar cavity is found
in monomer 2, and a similar but slightly larger and more
elongated cavity is found in monomer 1. Figure 13. A packing
defect inside the hydrophobic core. The structure of the cavity
inside monomer 3, as defined using a 1.2 å probe radius
(see text) and those side chains which form its boundaries are
shown. A very similar cavity is found in monomer 2, and a
similar but slightly larger and more elongated cavity is found
in monomer 1. (Figure prepared using FRODO [[3]47].)
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Structure
(1994,
2,
371-384)
copyright 1994.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
G.Dhar,
M.M.McLean,
J.K.Heiss,
and
R.C.Johnson
(2009).
The Hin recombinase assembles a tetrameric protein swivel that exchanges DNA strands.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 37,
4743-4756.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.J.Olorunniji,
J.He,
S.V.Wenwieser,
M.R.Boocock,
and
W.M.Stark
(2008).
Synapsis and catalysis by activated Tn3 resolvase mutants.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 36,
7181-7191.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.W.Mouw,
S.J.Rowland,
M.M.Gajjar,
M.R.Boocock,
W.M.Stark,
and
P.A.Rice
(2008).
Architecture of a serine recombinase-DNA regulatory complex.
|
| |
Mol Cell, 30,
145-155.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Bhardwaj,
K.Welfle,
R.Misselwitz,
S.Ayora,
J.C.Alonso,
and
H.Welfle
(2006).
Conformation and stability of the Streptococcus pyogenes pSM19035-encoded site-specific beta recombinase, and identification of a folding intermediate.
|
| |
Biol Chem, 387,
525-533.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Nöllmann,
O.Byron,
and
W.M.Stark
(2005).
Behavior of Tn3 resolvase in solution and its interaction with res.
|
| |
Biophys J, 89,
1920-1931.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Li,
S.Kamtekar,
Y.Xiong,
G.J.Sarkis,
N.D.Grindley,
and
T.A.Steitz
(2005).
Structure of a synaptic gammadelta resolvase tetramer covalently linked to two cleaved DNAs.
|
| |
Science, 309,
1210-1215.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Dhar,
E.R.Sanders,
and
R.C.Johnson
(2004).
Architecture of the hin synaptic complex during recombination: the recombinase subunits translocate with the DNA strands.
|
| |
Cell, 119,
33-45.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Fuentes,
A.Ballesteros,
and
C.S.Verma
(2004).
Specificity in lipases: a computational study of transesterification of sucrose.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 13,
3092-3103.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.E.Burke,
P.H.Arnold,
J.He,
S.V.Wenwieser,
S.J.Rowland,
M.R.Boocock,
and
W.M.Stark
(2004).
Activating mutations of Tn3 resolvase marking interfaces important in recombination catalysis and its regulation.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol, 51,
937-948.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Nöllmann,
J.He,
O.Byron,
and
W.M.Stark
(2004).
Solution structure of the Tn3 resolvase-crossover site synaptic complex.
|
| |
Mol Cell, 16,
127-137.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.E.Leschziner,
and
N.D.Grindley
(2003).
The architecture of the gammadelta resolvase crossover site synaptic complex revealed by using constrained DNA substrates.
|
| |
Mol Cell, 12,
775-781.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.J.Sarkis,
L.L.Murley,
A.E.Leschziner,
M.R.Boocock,
W.M.Stark,
and
N.D.Grindley
(2001).
A model for the gamma delta resolvase synaptic complex.
|
| |
Mol Cell, 8,
623-631.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Greenwald,
V.Le,
S.L.Butler,
F.D.Bushman,
and
S.Choe
(1999).
The mobility of an HIV-1 integrase active site loop is correlated with catalytic activity.
|
| |
Biochemistry, 38,
8892-8898.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.H.Arnold,
D.G.Blake,
N.D.Grindley,
M.R.Boocock,
and
W.M.Stark
(1999).
Mutants of Tn3 resolvase which do not require accessory binding sites for recombination activity.
|
| |
EMBO J, 18,
1407-1414.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.L.Murley,
and
N.D.Grindley
(1998).
Architecture of the gamma delta resolvase synaptosome: oriented heterodimers identity interactions essential for synapsis and recombination.
|
| |
Cell, 95,
553-562.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.K.Merickel,
M.J.Haykinson,
and
R.C.Johnson
(1998).
Communication between Hin recombinase and Fis regulatory subunits during coordinate activation of Hin-catalyzed site-specific DNA inversion.
|
| |
Genes Dev, 12,
2803-2816.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.V.Efimov
(1997).
Structural trees for protein superfamilies.
|
| |
Proteins, 28,
241-260.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Hallet,
and
D.J.Sherratt
(1997).
Transposition and site-specific recombination: adapting DNA cut-and-paste mechanisms to a variety of genetic rearrangements.
|
| |
FEMS Microbiol Rev, 21,
157-178.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.J.Kwon,
R.Tirumalai,
A.Landy,
and
T.Ellenberger
(1997).
Flexibility in DNA recombination: structure of the lambda integrase catalytic core.
|
| |
Science, 276,
126-131.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.Kercher,
P.Lu,
and
M.Lewis
(1997).
Lac repressor-operator complex.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol, 7,
76-85.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.J.Artymiuk,
T.A.Ceska,
D.Suck,
and
J.R.Sayers
(1997).
Prokaryotic 5'-3' exonucleases share a common core structure with gamma-delta resolvase.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 25,
4224-4229.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Savilahti,
and
K.Mizuuchi
(1996).
Mu transpositional recombination: donor DNA cleavage and strand transfer in trans by the Mu transposase.
|
| |
Cell, 85,
271-280.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.J.Haykinson,
L.M.Johnson,
J.Soong,
and
R.C.Johnson
(1996).
The Hin dimer interface is critical for Fis-mediated activation of the catalytic steps of site-specific DNA inversion.
|
| |
Curr Biol, 6,
163-177.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.E.Leschziner,
M.R.Boocock,
and
N.D.Grindley
(1995).
The tyrosine-6 hydroxyl of gamma delta resolvase is not required for the DNA cleavage and rejoining reactions.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol, 15,
865-870.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Craigie
(1995).
Resolving a resolvase.
|
| |
Nat Struct Biol, 2,
607-609.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Yang,
and
T.A.Steitz
(1995).
Crystal structure of the site-specific recombinase gamma delta resolvase complexed with a 34 bp cleavage site.
|
| |
Cell, 82,
193-207.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
|