 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.2.3.1.48
- Histone acetyltransferase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
Acetyl-CoA + [histone] = CoA + acetyl-[histone]
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Acetyl-CoA
|
+
|
[histone]
|
=
|
CoA
|
+
|
acetyl-[histone]
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the
KEGG ftp site
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Cellular component
|
nucleus
|
2 terms
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
chromatin assembly or disassembly
|
1 term
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
chromatin binding
|
1 term
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
378:987
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Novel structural and functional mode of a knot essential for RNA binding activity of the Esa1 presumed chromodomain.
|
|
H.Shimojo,
N.Sano,
Y.Moriwaki,
M.Okuda,
M.Horikoshi,
Y.Nishimura.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Chromodomains are methylated histone binding modules that have been widely
studied. Interestingly, some chromodomains are reported to bind to RNA and/or
DNA, although the molecular basis of their RNA/DNA interactions has not been
solved. Here we propose a novel binding mode for chromodomain-RNA interactions.
Essential Sas-related acetyltransferase 1 (Esa1) contains a presumed
chromodomain in addition to a histone acetyltransferase domain. We initially
determined the solution structure of the Esa1 presumed chromodomain and showed
it to consist of a well-folded structure containing a five-stranded beta-barrel
similar to the tudor domain rather than the canonical chromodomain. Furthermore,
the domain showed no RNA/DNA binding ability. Because the N-terminus of the
protein forms a helical turn, we prepared an N-terminally extended construct,
which we surprisingly found to bind to poly(U) and to be critical for in vivo
function. This extended protein contains an additional beta-sheet that acts as a
knot for the tudor domain and binds to oligo(U) and oligo(C) with greater
affinity compared with other oligo-RNAs and DNAs examined thus far. The knot
does not cause a global change in the core structure but induces a well-defined
loop in the tudor domain itself, which is responsible for RNA binding. We made
47 point mutants in an esa1 mutant gene in yeast in which amino acids of the
Esa1 knotted tudor domain were substituted to alanine residues and their
functional abilities were examined. Interestingly, the knotted tudor domain
mutations that were lethal to the yeast lost poly(U) binding ability. Amino
acids that are related to RNA interaction sites, as revealed by both NMR and
affinity binding experiments, are found to be important in vivo. These findings
are the first demonstration of how the novel structure of the knotted tudor
domain impacts on RNA binding and how this influences in vivo function.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Fig. 2. Overall structure of the Esa1 short tudor domain. (a)
Stereo view of the superposition of the 20 representative
structures of the Esa1 presumed chromodomain structure with the
lowest energy. The region unassigned by NMR is shown in blue.
The His-tag region is not shown. (b) Ribbon diagram of the Esa1
short tudor domain structure. The structure closest to the mean
structure of the 20 lowest energy structures is shown with the
secondary structural elements labeled.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Overall structure of the Esa1 knotted tudor domain.
(a) Stereo view of the superimposition of 20 representative
structures of the Esa1 knotted tudor domain with the lowest
energy. (b) Ribbon diagram of the Esa1 knotted tudor domain
structure. The structure closest to the mean structure of the 20
lowest energy structures is shown with the secondary structural
elements labeled.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2008,
378,
987-0)
copyright 2008.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
J.S.Mattick
(2011).
The central role of RNA in human development and cognition.
|
| |
FEBS Lett, 585,
1600-1616.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Hallacli,
and
A.Akhtar
(2009).
X chromosomal regulation in flies: when less is more.
|
| |
Chromosome Res, 17,
603-619.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.S.Mattick,
P.P.Amaral,
M.E.Dinger,
T.R.Mercer,
and
M.F.Mehler
(2009).
RNA regulation of epigenetic processes.
|
| |
Bioessays, 31,
51-59.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.Adams-Cioaba,
and
J.Min
(2009).
Structure and function of histone methylation binding proteins.
|
| |
Biochem Cell Biol, 87,
93.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
|
|