 |
PDBsum entry 2rmr
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2rmr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Transcription
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Solution structure of msin3a pah1 domain
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Paired amphipathic helix protein sin3a. Chain: a. Fragment: unp residues 119-189. Synonym: sin3a pah1 domain, transcriptional corepressor, sin3a, histone deacetylase associated sin3 corepressor complex subunit sin3a. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Mus musculus. House mouse. Organism_taxid: 10090. Gene: sin3a. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562.
|
|
NMR struc:
|
 |
20 models
|
 |
|
Authors:
|
 |
S.C.Sahu,K.A.Swanson,R.S.Kang,K.Huang,K.Brubaker,K.Ratcliff, I.Radhakrishnan
|
Key ref:
|
 |
S.C.Sahu
et al.
(2008).
Conserved themes in target recognition by the PAH1 and PAH2 domains of the Sin3 transcriptional corepressor.
J Mol Biol,
375,
1444-1456.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
14-Nov-07
|
Release date:
|
22-Jan-08
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q60520
(SIN3A_MOUSE) -
Paired amphipathic helix protein Sin3a from Mus musculus
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
1274 a.a.
71 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
375:1444-1456
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Conserved themes in target recognition by the PAH1 and PAH2 domains of the Sin3 transcriptional corepressor.
|
|
S.C.Sahu,
K.A.Swanson,
R.S.Kang,
K.Huang,
K.Brubaker,
K.Ratcliff,
I.Radhakrishnan.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The recruitment of chromatin-modifying coregulator complexes by transcription
factors to specific sites of the genome constitutes an important step in many
eukaryotic transcriptional regulatory pathways. The histone
deacetylase-associated Sin3 corepressor complex is recruited by a large and
diverse array of transcription factors through direct interactions with the
N-terminal PAH domains of Sin3. Here, we describe the solution structures of the
mSin3A PAH1 domain in the apo form and when bound to SAP25, a component of the
corepressor complex. Unlike the apo-mSin3A PAH2 domain, the apo-PAH1 domain is
conformationally pure and is largely, but not completely, folded. Portions of
the interacting segments of both mSin3A PAH1 and SAP25 undergo folding upon
complex formation. SAP25 binds through an amphipathic helix to a predominantly
hydrophobic cleft on the surface of PAH1. Remarkably, the orientation of the
helix is reversed compared to that adopted by NRSF, a transcription factor
unrelated to SAP25, upon binding to the mSin3B PAH1 domain. The reversal in
helical orientations is correlated with a reversal in the underlying
PAH1-interaction motifs, echoing a theme previously described for the mSin3A
PAH2 domain. The definition of these so-called type I and type II
PAH1-interaction motifs has allowed us to predict the precise location of these
motifs within previously experimentally characterized PAH1 binders. Finally, we
explore the specificity determinants of protein-protein interactions involving
the PAH1 and PAH2 domains. These studies reveal that even conservative
replacements of PAH2 residues with equivalent PAH1 residues are sufficient to
alter the affinity and specificity of these protein-protein interactions
dramatically.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Solution NMR structures of the apo-mSin3A PAH1
domain and the SAP25 SID–mSin3A PAH1 complex. Stereographic
views of the ensemble of 20 NMR structures of (a) the apo-mSin3A
PAH1 domain and (b) the SAP25 SID–mSin3A PAH1 complex
following a best-fit superposition of backbone atoms in
structurally ordered regions. Ribbon diagrams of the
representative structures of the respective ensembles are shown
in (c) and (d). The SAP25 SID is depicted in magenta, whereas
the mSin3A PAH1 domain is colored green. Residues 151−186 of
SAP25, although considered for the structure calculations, are
essentially unstructured and have been omitted from these views
for clarity.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. The SAP25 SID binds to a deep hydrophobic cleft in
the mSin3A PAH1 domain. Molecular surface views of the cleft
color-coded according to (a) residue type (hydrophobic, yellow;
polar, cyan) and (b) curvature (concave, gray; planar, white;
convex, green). The backbone of the SAP25 SID helix and the
PAH1-interacting side-chains are shown in worm and in stick
representations, respectively. (c) A catalogue of intermolecular
interactions in the SAP25 SID–mSin3A PAH1 complex detected in
≥60% of conformers in the NMR ensemble.^64 SAP25 and mSin3A
residues are presented in pale magenta and pale green
backgrounds, respectively. The lines connect interacting
residues. Line colors indicate the type of interaction (green,
electrostatic; red, hydrogen bonding; purple, salt-bridge; gray,
hydrophobic), whereas text colors indicate the type of residue
(green, hydrophobic; blue, polar; magenta, charged).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
from an Open Access publication published by Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2008,
375,
1444-1456)
copyright 2008.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
G.S.Kumar,
T.Xie,
Y.Zhang,
and
I.Radhakrishnan
(2011).
Solution structure of the mSin3A PAH2-Pf1 SID1 complex: a Mad1/Mxd1-like interaction disrupted by MRG15 in the Rpd3S/Sin3S complex.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
408,
987.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Jäschke,
J.Schwarz,
D.Clausnitzer,
C.Müller,
and
H.J.Schüller
(2011).
Pleiotropic corepressors Sin3 and Ssn6 interact with repressor Opi1 and negatively regulate transcription of genes required for phospholipid biosynthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
|
| |
Mol Genet Genomics,
285,
91.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Escobar-Cabrera,
D.K.Lau,
S.Giovinazzi,
A.M.Ishov,
and
L.P.McIntosh
(2010).
Structural characterization of the DAXX N-terminal helical bundle domain and its complex with Rassf1C.
|
| |
Structure,
18,
1642-1653.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.J.Falconer,
A.Penkova,
I.Jelesarov,
and
B.M.Collins
(2010).
Survey of the year 2008: applications of isothermal titration calorimetry.
|
| |
J Mol Recognit,
23,
395-413.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.E.Sardiu,
J.M.Gilmore,
M.J.Carrozza,
B.Li,
J.L.Workman,
L.Florens,
and
M.P.Washburn
(2009).
Determining protein complex connectivity using a probabilistic deletion network derived from quantitative proteomics.
|
| |
PLoS One,
4,
e7310.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.McDonel,
I.Costello,
and
B.Hendrich
(2009).
Keeping things quiet: roles of NuRD and Sin3 co-repressor complexes during mammalian development.
|
| |
Int J Biochem Cell Biol,
41,
108-116.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |