|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Cell cycle
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Crystal structure of the mad2/p31(comet)/mad2-binding peptide ternary complex
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint protein mad2a. Chain: a, c. Synonym: mad2-like 1, hsmad2. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes. Mad2l1-binding protein. Chain: b, d. Fragment: unp residues 36-274. Synonym: caught by mad2 protein.
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: mad2l1, mad2. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21(de3). Expression_system_taxid: 469008. Gene: mad2l1bp, cmt2, kiaa0110. Synthetic: yes. Other_details: synthetic 12-mer
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.30Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.190
|
R-free:
|
0.257
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
D.R.Tomchick,X.Luo
|
Key ref:
|
 |
M.Yang
et al.
(2007).
p31comet blocks Mad2 activation through structural mimicry.
Cell,
131,
744-755.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
14-Aug-07
|
Release date:
|
29-Jan-08
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q13257
(MD2L1_HUMAN) -
Mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint protein MAD2A from Homo sapiens
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
205 a.a.
197 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
Q15013
(MD2BP_HUMAN) -
MAD2L1-binding protein from Homo sapiens
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
274 a.a.
188 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
Q13257
(MD2L1_HUMAN) -
Mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint protein MAD2A from Homo sapiens
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
205 a.a.
183 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Cell
131:744-755
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
p31comet blocks Mad2 activation through structural mimicry.
|
|
M.Yang,
B.Li,
D.R.Tomchick,
M.Machius,
J.Rizo,
H.Yu,
X.Luo.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The status of spindle checkpoint signaling depends on the balance of two
opposing dynamic processes that regulate the highly unusual two-state behavior
of Mad2. In mitosis, a Mad1-Mad2 core complex recruits cytosolic Mad2 to
kinetochores through Mad2 dimerization and converts Mad2 to a conformer amenable
to Cdc20 binding, thereby facilitating checkpoint activation. p31(comet)
inactivates the checkpoint through binding to Mad1- or Cdc20-bound Mad2, thereby
preventing Mad2 activation and promoting the dissociation of the Mad2-Cdc20
complex. Here, we report the crystal structure of the Mad2-p31(comet) complex.
The C-terminal region of Mad2 that undergoes rearrangement in different Mad2
conformers is a major structural determinant for p31(comet) binding, explaining
the specificity of p31(comet) toward Mad1- or Cdc20-bound Mad2. p31(comet)
adopts a fold strikingly similar to that of Mad2 and binds at the dimerization
interface of Mad2. Thus, p31(comet) exploits the two-state behavior of Mad2 to
block its activation by acting as an "anti-Mad2."
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Interactions between Mad2 and p31^comet (A)
Ribbon diagrams of the Mad2-p31^comet complex. Two different
views are shown to provide a clearer perspective of the
Mad2-p31^comet interface. Helix αC in Mad2 is colored cyan to
highlight its central role in establishing interactions between
Mad2 and p31^comet. Three main patches of interactions at the
Mad2-p31^comet interface are labeled and circled with red dashed
lines. (B–D) Interactions between Mad2 and p31^comet. The
side chains of contacting residues are shown as sticks. Nitrogen
and oxygen atoms are colored blue and red, respectively. Mad2
carbons are colored yellow and p31^comet carbons are colored
gray and labeled in italics. The tightly bound water molecules
are drawn as red spheres in (C).
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. A Structural Model for the Blockage of
Mad1-Assisted Mad2 Activation by p31^comet (A) A structural
model of the Mad1-Mad2-p31^comet complex. The Mad2 molecule in
the Mad2-p31^comet complex was superimposed with the Mad2
molecules in the Mad1-Mad2 complex (PDB ID 1GO4). For clarity,
the Mad2 monomers in the Mad1-Mad2 complex are omitted. Mad1 is
colored green, with its Mad2-binding region colored red. The
three interacting helices in Mad2-p31^comet are indicated.
(B) A surface representation to show that C-Mad2 uses a similar
surface for the binding of p31^comet or O-Mad2. The
p31^comet-binding residues of C-Mad2 are colored yellow, and the
four key interacting residues, R133, Q134, R184 and F141, are
colored red. The O-Mad2-binding residues of C-Mad2 are colored
yellow. The same four residues R133, Q134, R184, and F141 (red)
that are important for p31^comet binding are also involved in
O-Mad2 binding. (C) Ribbon diagram of the O-Mad2–C-Mad2
dimer (Mapelli et al., 2007). O-Mad2 is colored in cyan. C-Mad2
is colored blue with its C-terminal region shown in yellow. MBP1
is in red. The αC helices are labeled. (D) Ribbon diagram
of the Mad2-p31^comet complex with C-Mad2 in the same
orientation as in (C). (E) Overlay of ribbon diagrams of
the O-Mad2–C-Mad2 dimer and the Mad2-p31^comet complex. The
C-Mad2 molecules in both structures are superimposed. The color
scheme is the same as in (C) and (D).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
from an Open Access publication published by Cell Press:
Cell
(2007,
131,
744-755)
copyright 2007.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
K.Uzunova,
B.T.Dye,
H.Schutz,
R.Ladurner,
G.Petzold,
Y.Toyoda,
M.A.Jarvis,
N.G.Brown,
I.Poser,
M.Novatchkova,
K.Mechtler,
A.A.Hyman,
H.Stark,
B.A.Schulman,
and
J.M.Peters
(2012).
APC15 mediates CDC20 autoubiquitylation by APC/C(MCC) and disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
19,
1116-1123.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.C.Chao,
K.Kulkarni,
Z.Zhang,
E.H.Kong,
and
D.Barford
(2012).
Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex.
|
| |
Nature,
484,
208-213.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Teichner,
E.Eytan,
D.Sitry-Shevah,
S.Miniowitz-Shemtov,
E.Dumin,
J.Gromis,
and
A.Hershko
(2011).
p31comet Promotes disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex in an ATP-dependent process.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
108,
3187-3192.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.W.Murray
(2011).
A brief history of error.
|
| |
Nat Cell Biol,
13,
1178-1182.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Mansfeld,
P.Collin,
M.O.Collins,
J.S.Choudhary,
and
J.Pines
(2011).
APC15 drives the turnover of MCC-CDC20 to make the spindle assembly checkpoint responsive to kinetochore attachment.
|
| |
Nat Cell Biol,
13,
1234-1243.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.R.McLean,
D.Chaix,
M.D.Ohi,
and
K.L.Gould
(2011).
State of the APC/C: organization, function, and structure.
|
| |
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol,
46,
118-136.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Maciejowski,
K.A.George,
M.E.Terret,
C.Zhang,
K.M.Shokat,
and
P.V.Jallepalli
(2010).
Mps1 directs the assembly of Cdc20 inhibitory complexes during interphase and mitosis to control M phase timing and spindle checkpoint signaling.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
190,
89.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Zich,
and
K.G.Hardwick
(2010).
Getting down to the phosphorylated 'nuts and bolts' of spindle checkpoint signalling.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
35,
18-27.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Hara,
H.Hashimoto,
Y.Murakumo,
S.Kobayashi,
T.Kogame,
S.Unzai,
S.Akashi,
S.Takeda,
T.Shimizu,
and
M.Sato
(2010).
Crystal structure of human REV7 in complex with a human REV3 fragment and structural implication of the interaction between DNA polymerase zeta and REV1.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
285,
12299-12307.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Q.Liu,
Y.Hirohashi,
X.Du,
M.I.Greene,
and
Q.Wang
(2010).
Nek2 targets the mitotic checkpoint proteins Mad2 and Cdc20: a mechanism for aneuploidy in cancer.
|
| |
Exp Mol Pathol,
88,
225-233.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Gassmann,
A.J.Holland,
D.Varma,
X.Wan,
F.Civril,
D.W.Cleveland,
K.Oegema,
E.D.Salmon,
and
A.Desai
(2010).
Removal of Spindly from microtubule-attached kinetochores controls spindle checkpoint silencing in human cells.
|
| |
Genes Dev,
24,
957-971.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Kim,
H.Sun,
H.L.Ball,
K.Wassmann,
X.Luo,
and
H.Yu
(2010).
Phosphorylation of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 regulates its conformational transition.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
19772-19777.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.C.Osmundson,
D.Ray,
F.E.Moore,
and
H.Kiyokawa
(2009).
Smurf2 as a novel mitotic regulator: From the spindle assembly checkpoint to tumorigenesis.
|
| |
Cell Div,
4,
14.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Simonetta,
R.Manzoni,
R.Mosca,
M.Mapelli,
L.Massimiliano,
M.Vink,
B.Novak,
A.Musacchio,
and
A.Ciliberto
(2009).
The Influence of Catalysis on Mad2 Activation Dynamics.
|
| |
PLoS Biol,
7,
e10.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Fujita,
H.Ikeda,
N.Taira,
S.Hatoh,
M.Naito,
and
H.Doihara
(2009).
Overexpression of UbcH10 alternates the cell cycle profile and accelerate the tumor proliferation in colon cancer.
|
| |
BMC Cancer,
9,
87.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Vanoosthuyse,
and
K.G.Hardwick
(2009).
A novel protein phosphatase 1-dependent spindle checkpoint silencing mechanism.
|
| |
Curr Biol,
19,
1176-1181.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Vanoosthuyse,
and
K.G.Hardwick
(2009).
Overcoming inhibition in the spindle checkpoint.
|
| |
Genes Dev,
23,
2799-2805.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Ibrahim,
S.Diekmann,
E.Schmitt,
and
P.Dittrich
(2008).
In-silico modeling of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint.
|
| |
PLoS ONE,
3,
e1555.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.A.Pesin,
and
T.L.Orr-Weaver
(2008).
Regulation of APC/C activators in mitosis and meiosis.
|
| |
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol,
24,
475-499.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.M.Peters
(2008).
Checkpoint control: the journey continues.
|
| |
Curr Biol,
18,
R170-R172.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Yang,
B.Li,
C.J.Liu,
D.R.Tomchick,
M.Machius,
J.Rizo,
H.Yu,
and
X.Luo
(2008).
Insights into mad2 regulation in the spindle checkpoint revealed by the crystal structure of the symmetric mad2 dimer.
|
| |
PLoS Biol,
6,
e50.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.S.Gieni,
G.K.Chan,
and
M.J.Hendzel
(2008).
Epigenetics regulate centromere formation and kinetochore function.
|
| |
J Cell Biochem,
104,
2027-2039.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.van Leuken,
L.Clijsters,
and
R.Wolthuis
(2008).
To cell cycle, swing the APC/C.
|
| |
Biochim Biophys Acta,
1786,
49-59.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.J.Suijkerbuijk,
and
G.J.Kops
(2008).
Preventing aneuploidy: the contribution of mitotic checkpoint proteins.
|
| |
Biochim Biophys Acta,
1786,
24-31.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Luo,
and
H.Yu
(2008).
Protein metamorphosis: the two-state behavior of Mad2.
|
| |
Structure,
16,
1616-1625.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Mapelli,
and
A.Musacchio
(2007).
MAD contortions: conformational dimerization boosts spindle checkpoint signaling.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
17,
716-725.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
| |