spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 2qyf

Go to PDB code: 
protein ligands Protein-protein interface(s) links
Cell cycle PDB id
2qyf

 

 

 

 

Loading ...

 
JSmol PyMol  
Contents
Protein chains
197 a.a. *
188 a.a. *
183 a.a. *
191 a.a. *
11 a.a. *
Ligands
SER-TRP-TYR-SER-
TYR-PRO-PRO-PRO-
GLN-ARG
Waters ×658
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
2qyf
Name: Cell cycle
Title: Crystal structure of the mad2/p31(comet)/mad2-binding peptide ternary complex
Structure: Mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint protein mad2a. Chain: a, c. Synonym: mad2-like 1, hsmad2. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes. Mad2l1-binding protein. Chain: b, d. Fragment: unp residues 36-274. Synonym: caught by mad2 protein.
Source: Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: mad2l1, mad2. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21(de3). Expression_system_taxid: 469008. Gene: mad2l1bp, cmt2, kiaa0110. Synthetic: yes. Other_details: synthetic 12-mer
Resolution:
2.30Å     R-factor:   0.190     R-free:   0.257
Authors: D.R.Tomchick,X.Luo
Key ref:
M.Yang et al. (2007). p31comet blocks Mad2 activation through structural mimicry. Cell, 131, 744-755. PubMed id: 18022368 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.048
Date:
14-Aug-07     Release date:   29-Jan-08    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
Q13257  (MD2L1_HUMAN) -  Mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint protein MAD2A from Homo sapiens
Seq:
Struc:
205 a.a.
197 a.a.*
Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
Q15013  (MD2BP_HUMAN) -  MAD2L1-binding protein from Homo sapiens
Seq:
Struc:
274 a.a.
188 a.a.
Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
Q13257  (MD2L1_HUMAN) -  Mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint protein MAD2A from Homo sapiens
Seq:
Struc:
205 a.a.
183 a.a.*
Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
Q15013  (MD2BP_HUMAN) -  MAD2L1-binding protein from Homo sapiens
Seq:
Struc:
274 a.a.
191 a.a.
Protein chain
No UniProt id for this chain
Struc: 11 a.a.
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain
* PDB and UniProt seqs differ at 2 residue positions (black crosses)

 

 
DOI no: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.048 Cell 131:744-755 (2007)
PubMed id: 18022368  
 
 
p31comet blocks Mad2 activation through structural mimicry.
M.Yang, B.Li, D.R.Tomchick, M.Machius, J.Rizo, H.Yu, X.Luo.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
The status of spindle checkpoint signaling depends on the balance of two opposing dynamic processes that regulate the highly unusual two-state behavior of Mad2. In mitosis, a Mad1-Mad2 core complex recruits cytosolic Mad2 to kinetochores through Mad2 dimerization and converts Mad2 to a conformer amenable to Cdc20 binding, thereby facilitating checkpoint activation. p31(comet) inactivates the checkpoint through binding to Mad1- or Cdc20-bound Mad2, thereby preventing Mad2 activation and promoting the dissociation of the Mad2-Cdc20 complex. Here, we report the crystal structure of the Mad2-p31(comet) complex. The C-terminal region of Mad2 that undergoes rearrangement in different Mad2 conformers is a major structural determinant for p31(comet) binding, explaining the specificity of p31(comet) toward Mad1- or Cdc20-bound Mad2. p31(comet) adopts a fold strikingly similar to that of Mad2 and binds at the dimerization interface of Mad2. Thus, p31(comet) exploits the two-state behavior of Mad2 to block its activation by acting as an "anti-Mad2."
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Interactions between Mad2 and p31^comet
(A) Ribbon diagrams of the Mad2-p31^comet complex. Two different views are shown to provide a clearer perspective of the Mad2-p31^comet interface. Helix αC in Mad2 is colored cyan to highlight its central role in establishing interactions between Mad2 and p31^comet. Three main patches of interactions at the Mad2-p31^comet interface are labeled and circled with red dashed lines.
(B–D) Interactions between Mad2 and p31^comet. The side chains of contacting residues are shown as sticks. Nitrogen and oxygen atoms are colored blue and red, respectively. Mad2 carbons are colored yellow and p31^comet carbons are colored gray and labeled in italics. The tightly bound water molecules are drawn as red spheres in (C).
Figure 6.
Figure 6. A Structural Model for the Blockage of Mad1-Assisted Mad2 Activation by p31^comet
(A) A structural model of the Mad1-Mad2-p31^comet complex. The Mad2 molecule in the Mad2-p31^comet complex was superimposed with the Mad2 molecules in the Mad1-Mad2 complex (PDB ID 1GO4). For clarity, the Mad2 monomers in the Mad1-Mad2 complex are omitted. Mad1 is colored green, with its Mad2-binding region colored red. The three interacting helices in Mad2-p31^comet are indicated.
(B) A surface representation to show that C-Mad2 uses a similar surface for the binding of p31^comet or O-Mad2. The p31^comet-binding residues of C-Mad2 are colored yellow, and the four key interacting residues, R133, Q134, R184 and F141, are colored red. The O-Mad2-binding residues of C-Mad2 are colored yellow. The same four residues R133, Q134, R184, and F141 (red) that are important for p31^comet binding are also involved in O-Mad2 binding.
(C) Ribbon diagram of the O-Mad2–C-Mad2 dimer (Mapelli et al., 2007). O-Mad2 is colored in cyan. C-Mad2 is colored blue with its C-terminal region shown in yellow. MBP1 is in red. The αC helices are labeled.
(D) Ribbon diagram of the Mad2-p31^comet complex with C-Mad2 in the same orientation as in (C).
(E) Overlay of ribbon diagrams of the O-Mad2–C-Mad2 dimer and the Mad2-p31^comet complex. The C-Mad2 molecules in both structures are superimposed. The color scheme is the same as in (C) and (D).
 
  The above figures are reprinted from an Open Access publication published by Cell Press: Cell (2007, 131, 744-755) copyright 2007.  
  Figures were selected by the author.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
23007861 K.Uzunova, B.T.Dye, H.Schutz, R.Ladurner, G.Petzold, Y.Toyoda, M.A.Jarvis, N.G.Brown, I.Poser, M.Novatchkova, K.Mechtler, A.A.Hyman, H.Stark, B.A.Schulman, and J.M.Peters (2012).
APC15 mediates CDC20 autoubiquitylation by APC/C(MCC) and disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex.
  Nat Struct Mol Biol, 19, 1116-1123.  
22437499 W.C.Chao, K.Kulkarni, Z.Zhang, E.H.Kong, and D.Barford (2012).
Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex.
  Nature, 484, 208-213.
PDB code: 4aez
21300909 A.Teichner, E.Eytan, D.Sitry-Shevah, S.Miniowitz-Shemtov, E.Dumin, J.Gromis, and A.Hershko (2011).
p31comet Promotes disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex in an ATP-dependent process.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108, 3187-3192.  
21968991 A.W.Murray (2011).
A brief history of error.
  Nat Cell Biol, 13, 1178-1182.  
21926987 J.Mansfeld, P.Collin, M.O.Collins, J.S.Choudhary, and J.Pines (2011).
APC15 drives the turnover of MCC-CDC20 to make the spindle assembly checkpoint responsive to kinetochore attachment.
  Nat Cell Biol, 13, 1234-1243.  
21261459 J.R.McLean, D.Chaix, M.D.Ohi, and K.L.Gould (2011).
State of the APC/C: organization, function, and structure.
  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol, 46, 118-136.  
20624902 J.Maciejowski, K.A.George, M.E.Terret, C.Zhang, K.M.Shokat, and P.V.Jallepalli (2010).
Mps1 directs the assembly of Cdc20 inhibitory complexes during interphase and mitosis to control M phase timing and spindle checkpoint signaling.
  J Cell Biol, 190, 89.  
19836959 J.Zich, and K.G.Hardwick (2010).
Getting down to the phosphorylated 'nuts and bolts' of spindle checkpoint signalling.
  Trends Biochem Sci, 35, 18-27.  
20164194 K.Hara, H.Hashimoto, Y.Murakumo, S.Kobayashi, T.Kogame, S.Unzai, S.Akashi, S.Takeda, T.Shimizu, and M.Sato (2010).
Crystal structure of human REV7 in complex with a human REV3 fragment and structural implication of the interaction between DNA polymerase zeta and REV1.
  J Biol Chem, 285, 12299-12307.
PDB codes: 3abd 3abe
20034488 Q.Liu, Y.Hirohashi, X.Du, M.I.Greene, and Q.Wang (2010).
Nek2 targets the mitotic checkpoint proteins Mad2 and Cdc20: a mechanism for aneuploidy in cancer.
  Exp Mol Pathol, 88, 225-233.  
20439434 R.Gassmann, A.J.Holland, D.Varma, X.Wan, F.Civril, D.W.Cleveland, K.Oegema, E.D.Salmon, and A.Desai (2010).
Removal of Spindly from microtubule-attached kinetochores controls spindle checkpoint silencing in human cells.
  Genes Dev, 24, 957-971.  
21041666 S.Kim, H.Sun, H.L.Ball, K.Wassmann, X.Luo, and H.Yu (2010).
Phosphorylation of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 regulates its conformational transition.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107, 19772-19777.  
19583833 E.C.Osmundson, D.Ray, F.E.Moore, and H.Kiyokawa (2009).
Smurf2 as a novel mitotic regulator: From the spindle assembly checkpoint to tumorigenesis.
  Cell Div, 4, 14.  
19143472 M.Simonetta, R.Manzoni, R.Mosca, M.Mapelli, L.Massimiliano, M.Vink, B.Novak, A.Musacchio, and A.Ciliberto (2009).
The Influence of Catalysis on Mad2 Activation Dynamics.
  PLoS Biol, 7, e10.  
19302711 T.Fujita, H.Ikeda, N.Taira, S.Hatoh, M.Naito, and H.Doihara (2009).
Overexpression of UbcH10 alternates the cell cycle profile and accelerate the tumor proliferation in colon cancer.
  BMC Cancer, 9, 87.  
19592249 V.Vanoosthuyse, and K.G.Hardwick (2009).
A novel protein phosphatase 1-dependent spindle checkpoint silencing mechanism.
  Curr Biol, 19, 1176-1181.  
20008930 V.Vanoosthuyse, and K.G.Hardwick (2009).
Overcoming inhibition in the spindle checkpoint.
  Genes Dev, 23, 2799-2805.  
18253502 B.Ibrahim, S.Diekmann, E.Schmitt, and P.Dittrich (2008).
In-silico modeling of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint.
  PLoS ONE, 3, e1555.  
18598214 J.A.Pesin, and T.L.Orr-Weaver (2008).
Regulation of APC/C activators in mitosis and meiosis.
  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 24, 475-499.  
18302922 J.M.Peters (2008).
Checkpoint control: the journey continues.
  Curr Biol, 18, R170-R172.  
18318601 M.Yang, B.Li, C.J.Liu, D.R.Tomchick, M.Machius, J.Rizo, H.Yu, and X.Luo (2008).
Insights into mad2 regulation in the spindle checkpoint revealed by the crystal structure of the symmetric mad2 dimer.
  PLoS Biol, 6, e50.
PDB code: 2vfx
18404676 R.S.Gieni, G.K.Chan, and M.J.Hendzel (2008).
Epigenetics regulate centromere formation and kinetochore function.
  J Cell Biochem, 104, 2027-2039.  
18544349 R.van Leuken, L.Clijsters, and R.Wolthuis (2008).
To cell cycle, swing the APC/C.
  Biochim Biophys Acta, 1786, 49-59.  
18472014 S.J.Suijkerbuijk, and G.J.Kops (2008).
Preventing aneuploidy: the contribution of mitotic checkpoint proteins.
  Biochim Biophys Acta, 1786, 24-31.  
19000814 X.Luo, and H.Yu (2008).
Protein metamorphosis: the two-state behavior of Mad2.
  Structure, 16, 1616-1625.  
17920260 M.Mapelli, and A.Musacchio (2007).
MAD contortions: conformational dimerization boosts spindle checkpoint signaling.
  Curr Opin Struct Biol, 17, 716-725.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB code is shown on the right.

 

spacer

spacer