 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription repressor
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2p5l
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent
|
2 terms
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity
|
1 term
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
379:284-298
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structure and function of the arginine repressor-operator complex from Bacillus subtilis.
|
|
J.A.Garnett,
F.Marincs,
S.Baumberg,
P.G.Stockley,
S.E.Phillips.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
In many bacteria, the concentration of L-arginine is controlled by a
transcriptional regulator, the arginine repressor. In Bacillus subtilis this
transcription factor is called AhrC and has roles in both the repression and
activation of the genes involved in arginine metabolism. It interacts with 18 bp
ARG boxes in the promoters of arginine biosynthetic and catabolic operons. AhrC
is a hexamer and each subunit has two domains. The C-terminal domains form the
core, mediating inter-subunit interactions and L-arginine binding, while the
N-terminal domains contain a winged helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif and are
arranged around the periphery. Upon binding of the co-repressor L-arginine there
is a approximately 15 degrees relative rotation between core C-terminal trimers.
Here, we report the X-ray crystal structure of a dimer of the N-terminal domains
of AhrC (NAhrC) in complex with an 18 bp DNA ARG box operator, refined to 2.85 A
resolution. Comparison of the N-terminal domains within this complex with those
of the free domain reveals that the flexible beta-wings of the DNA-binding motif
in the free domain form a stable dimer interface in the protein-DNA complex,
favouring correct orientation of the recognition helices. These are then
positioned to insert into adjacent turns of the major groove of the ARG box,
whilst the wings contact the minor groove. There are extensive contacts between
the protein and the DNA phosphodiester backbone, as well as a number of direct
hydrogen bonds between conserved amino acid side chains and bases. Combining
this structure with other crystal structures of other AhrC components, we have
constructed a model of the repression complex of AhrC at the B. subtilis
biosynthetic argC operator and, along with transcriptome data, analysed the
origins of sequence specificity and arginine activation.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Structure and symmetry of the N-terminal AhrC-DNA
complex in the asymmetric unit. (a) ARG box sequence used in the
NAhrC–DNA complex crystal structure. The top strand
corresponds to polynucleotide chains A and E of the complex, and
the bottom strand to polynucleotide chains B and F. An
approximate dyad passes between base pairs 9 and 10. Asymmetric
base positions are shaded green and positions that were
substituted by 5-bromouracil in the Br-NAhrC–DNA complex are
identified by a red asterisk. (b) Electron density showing the
orientation of the ARG box DNA in the asymmetric unit for chains
A (purple) and B (yellow). Asymmetric bases were removed and the
F[o]
–
F[c]
map
calculated after refinement (contoured at 5.5 σ). The larger
peaks correspond to adenine and are associated with chain A,
while the smaller peaks (thymine) belong to chain B. (c)
Relationship between the two independent complexes in the
asymmetric unit, in a similar orientation to that in (b). ARG
box chains A (teal), B (purple), E (red), F (blue) and NAhrC
chains C (orange), D (yellow), G (peach), H (green) pack in the
asymmetric unit, with chains A–D and chains E–H related by
approximate intermolecular twofold NCS. The adjacent complexes
in the lattice are stacked end to end, related by twofold
crystallographic symmetry to form pseudo-continuous duplexes.
(d) The triple base pair formed at the NCS intersection, where
two DNA duplexes pack 5′ to 5′, and 3′ to 3′. (e) The
structure of the NAhrC-DNA complex, chains A –D. The two
half-complexes are related by intramolecular pseudo twofold NCS.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. Energy minimised model of the AhrC–argC complex.
The figure is coloured as in Fig. 3, with ARG boxes blue and the
11 bp spacer coloured purple. The spacer DNA and AhrC linkers
were built into the model, energy minimised and the protein
stereochemistry analysed with PROCHECK^32 and the DNA curvature
with CURVES5. 1.^[34]^ and ^[35] (a) In the holo-AhrC-argC
promoter model, argC[01L] and argC[01R], separated by 11 bp of
DNA, are bent around AhrC with a helical bend of vert,
similar 120°. A third ARG box (argC[02]) bound to AhrC is
shown, although it is not certain whether the intervening DNA is
wrapped around AhrC or looped out. (b) The view is along the
twofold axis of AhrC.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2008,
379,
284-298)
copyright 2008.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
M.Fulde,
J.Willenborg,
A.de Greeff,
L.Benga,
H.E.Smith,
P.Valentin-Weigand,
and
R.Goethe
(2011).
ArgR is an essential local transcriptional regulator of the arcABC operon in Streptococcus suis and is crucial for biological fitness in an acidic environment.
|
| |
Microbiology, 157,
572-582.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.P.Zhang,
Y.Z.Pigli,
and
P.A.Rice
(2010).
Structure of the LexA-DNA complex and implications for SOS box measurement.
|
| |
Nature, 466,
883-886.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Chaix,
M.L.Ferguson,
C.Atmanene,
A.Van Dorsselaer,
S.Sanglier-Cianférani,
C.A.Royer,
and
N.Declerck
(2010).
Physical basis of the inducer-dependent cooperativity of the Central glycolytic genes Repressor/DNA complex.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 38,
5944-5957.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Resch,
E.Schiltz,
F.Titgemeyer,
and
Y.A.Muller
(2010).
Insight into the induction mechanism of the GntR/HutC bacterial transcription regulator YvoA.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 38,
2485-2497.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.A.McMahon,
G.A.Roberts,
K.A.Johnson,
L.P.Cooper,
H.Liu,
J.H.White,
L.G.Carter,
B.Sanghvi,
M.Oke,
M.D.Walkinshaw,
G.W.Blakely,
J.H.Naismith,
and
D.T.Dryden
(2009).
Extensive DNA mimicry by the ArdA anti-restriction protein and its role in the spread of antibiotic resistance.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 37,
4887-4897.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Sekeyová,
M.Kowalczewska,
P.Decloquement,
N.Pelletier,
E.Spitalská,
and
D.Raoult
(2009).
Identification of protein candidates for the serodiagnosis of Q fever endocarditis by an immunoproteomic approach.
|
| |
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 28,
287-295.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.T.Cherney,
M.M.Cherney,
C.R.Garen,
G.J.Lu,
and
M.N.James
(2008).
Structure of the C-terminal domain of the arginine repressor protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 64,
950-956.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
|