 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
methylation
|
3 terms
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
transferase activity
|
3 terms
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
371:1141-1150
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Alternative conformations of the archaeal Nop56/58-fibrillarin complex imply flexibility in box C/D RNPs.
|
|
S.Oruganti,
Y.Zhang,
H.Li,
H.Robinson,
M.P.Terns,
R.M.Terns,
W.Yang,
H.Li.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The Nop56/58-fibrillarin heterocomplex is a core protein complex of the box C/D
ribonucleoprotein particles that modify and process ribosomal RNAs. The previous
crystal structure of the Archaeoglobus fulgidus complex revealed a symmetric
dimer of two Nop56/58-fibrillarin complexes linked by the coiled-coil domains of
the Nop56/68 proteins. However, because the A. fulgidus Nop56/58 protein lacks
some domains found in most other species, it was thought that the bipartite
architecture of the heterocomplex was not likely a general phenomenon. Here we
report the crystal structure of the Nop56/58-fibrillarin complex bound with
methylation cofactor, S-adenosyl-L-methionine from Pyrococcus furiosus, at 2.7
A. The new complex confirms the generality of the previously observed bipartite
arrangement. In addition however, the conformation of Nop56/58 in the new
structure differs substantially from that in the earlier structure. The distinct
conformations of Nop56/58 suggest potential flexibility in Nop56/58.
Computational normal mode analysis supports this view. Importantly, fibrillarin
is repositioned within the two complexes. We propose that hinge motion within
Nop56/58 has important implications for the possibility of simultaneously
positioning two catalytic sites at the two target sites of a bipartite box C/D
guide RNA.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Configuration of the components involved in box C/D
RNP assembly. The conserved box C/D sequences and the number of
nucleotides found in predicted P. furiosus box C/D RNA spacer
regions [from http://lowelab.ucsc.edu/snoRNAdb/] are indicated.
The cartoon model represents the structure of A. fulgidus
Nop56/58–fibrillarin.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Structure comparison between Pf (yellow) and Af
(green) Nop56/58. (a) Superimposition of the Pf Nop56/58
coiled-coil domain with that of Af Nop56/58. The Pf coiled-coil
contains a 56 amino acid insertion that does not disrupt
coiled-coil dimerization. (b) A view showing the drastically
different placement of the N-terminal domains in Pf (yellow) and
Af Nop56/58 (green) with respect to the superimposed coiled-coil
domains. Black lines and distances show the path connecting the
two SAM molecules in each of the complexes. (Note fibrillarin,
the Nop56/58 C-terminal domain, and the Pf insertion domain are
not depicted. To see fibrillarin in the complex in the same
orientation, see Figure 4.) (c) Difference in the pathway
between SAM and the conserved C-terminal domain of Nop56/58
(arbitrarily oriented on the strictly conserved GAEK
tetrapeptide region) in the two structures. Only the Pf Nop56/58
C-terminal domain is shown.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2007,
371,
1141-1150)
copyright 2007.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
B.Liang,
and
H.Li
(2011).
Structures of ribonucleoprotein particle modification enzymes.
|
| |
Q Rev Biophys, 44,
95.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Lin,
S.Lai,
R.Jia,
A.Xu,
L.Zhang,
J.Lu,
and
K.Ye
(2011).
Structural basis for site-specific ribose methylation by box C/D RNA protein complexes.
|
| |
Nature, 469,
559-563.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Bleichert,
and
S.J.Baserga
(2010).
Ribonucleoprotein multimers and their functions.
|
| |
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol, 45,
331-350.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Bleichert,
K.T.Gagnon,
B.A.Brown,
E.S.Maxwell,
A.E.Leschziner,
V.M.Unger,
and
S.J.Baserga
(2009).
A dimeric structure for archaeal box C/D small ribonucleoproteins.
|
| |
Science, 325,
1384-1387.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.W.Hardin,
F.E.Reyes,
and
R.T.Batey
(2009).
Analysis of a Critical Interaction within the Archaeal Box C/D Small Ribonucleoprotein Complex.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 284,
15317-15324.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Ye,
R.Jia,
J.Lin,
M.Ju,
J.Peng,
A.Xu,
and
L.Zhang
(2009).
Structural organization of box C/D RNA-guided RNA methyltransferase.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106,
13808-13813.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Ishitani,
S.Yokoyama,
and
O.Nureki
(2008).
Structure, dynamics, and function of RNA modification enzymes.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol, 18,
330-339.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.K.Singh,
P.Gurha,
and
R.Gupta
(2008).
Dynamic guide-target interactions contribute to sequential 2'-O-methylation by a unique archaeal dual guide box C/D sRNP.
|
| |
RNA, 14,
1411-1423.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
| |