 |
PDBsum entry 2kis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription regulator
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2kis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Transcription regulator
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Solution structure of ca150 ff1 domain and ff1-ff2 interdomain linker
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Transcription elongation regulator 1. Chain: a. Fragment: ff1 domain: unp residues 659-724. Synonym: tata box-binding protein-associated factor 2s, transcription factor ca150, ca150, tcerg-1. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: ca150, taf2s, tcerg-1, tcerg1. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562. Other_details: n-terminal 6xhis tag cleaved using tev protease
|
|
NMR struc:
|
 |
7 models
|
 |
|
Authors:
|
 |
J.M.Murphy,D.Hansen,S.Wiesner,D.Muhandiram,M.Borg,M.J.Smith, F.Sicheri,L.E.Kay,J.D.Forman-Kay,T.Pawson
|
|
Key ref:
|
 |
J.M.Murphy
et al.
(2009).
Structural studies of FF domains of the transcription factor CA150 provide insights into the organization of FF domain tandem arrays.
J Mol Biol,
393,
409-424.
PubMed id:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
08-May-09
|
Release date:
|
08-Sep-09
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O14776
(TCRG1_HUMAN) -
Transcription elongation regulator 1 from Homo sapiens
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
1098 a.a.
71 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
*
PDB and UniProt seqs differ
at 4 residue positions (black
crosses)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
J Mol Biol
393:409-424
(2009)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural studies of FF domains of the transcription factor CA150 provide insights into the organization of FF domain tandem arrays.
|
|
J.M.Murphy,
D.F.Hansen,
S.Wiesner,
D.R.Muhandiram,
M.Borg,
M.J.Smith,
F.Sicheri,
L.E.Kay,
J.D.Forman-Kay,
T.Pawson.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
FF domains are poorly understood protein interaction modules that are present
within eukaryotic transcription factors, such as CA150 (TCERG-1). The CA150 FF
domains have been shown to mediate interactions with the phosphorylated
C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II (phosphoCTD) and a multitude of
transcription factors and RNA processing proteins, and may therefore have a
central role in organizing transcription. FF domains occur in tandem arrays of
up to six domains, although it is not known whether they adopt higher-order
structures. We have used the CA150 FF1+FF2 domains as a model system to examine
whether tandem FF domains form higher-order structures in solution using NMR
spectroscopy. In the solution structure of FF1 fused to the linker that joins
FF1 to FF2, we observed that the highly conserved linker peptide is ordered and
forms a helical extension of helix alpha3, suggesting that the interdomain
linker might have a role in orientating FF1 relative to FF2. However,
examination of the FF1+FF2 domains using relaxation NMR experiments revealed
that although these domains are not rigidly orientated relative to one another,
they do not tumble independently. Thus, the FF1+FF2 structure conforms to a
dumbbell-shape in solution, where the helical interdomain linker maintains
distance between the two dynamic FF domains without cementing their relative
orientations. This model for FF domain organization within tandem arrays
suggests a general mechanism by which individual FF domains can manoeuvre to
achieve optimal recognition of flexible binding partners, such as the
intrinsically-disordered phosphoCTD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
S.Yao,
J.M.Murphy,
A.Low,
and
R.S.Norton
(2010).
1H, 13C and 15N resonance assignments of a highly-soluble murine interleukin-3 analogue with wild-type bioactivity.
|
| |
Biomol NMR Assign,
4,
73-77.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
|
');
}
}
 |