 |
PDBsum entry 2k3b
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structural protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2k3b
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
105:11766-11771
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structures of invisible, excited protein states by relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy.
|
|
P.Vallurupalli,
D.F.Hansen,
L.E.Kay.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Molecular function is often predicated on excursions between ground states and
higher energy conformers that can play important roles in ligand binding,
molecular recognition, enzyme catalysis, and protein folding. The tools of
structural biology enable a detailed characterization of ground state structure
and dynamics; however, studies of excited state conformations are more difficult
because they are of low population and may exist only transiently. Here we
describe an approach based on relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy in which
structures of invisible, excited states are obtained from chemical shifts and
residual anisotropic magnetic interactions. To establish the utility of the
approach, we studied an exchanging protein (Abp1p SH3 domain)-ligand (Ark1p
peptide) system, in which the peptide is added in only small amounts so that the
ligand-bound form is invisible. From a collection of (15)N, (1)HN, (13)C(alpha),
and (13)CO chemical shifts, along with (1)HN-(15)N, (1)H(alpha)-(13)C(alpha),
and (1)HN-(13)CO residual dipolar couplings and (13)CO residual chemical shift
anisotropies, all pertaining to the invisible, bound conformer, the structure of
the bound state is determined. The structure so obtained is cross-validated by
comparison with (1)HN-(15)N residual dipolar couplings recorded in a second
alignment medium. The methodology described opens up the possibility for
detailed structural studies of invisible protein conformers at a level of detail
that has heretofore been restricted to applications involving visible ground
states of proteins.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Probing chemical shifts and residual anisotropic interactions
in the invisible, excited state. (A) Stick model of a
polypeptide chain fragment highlighting the dipolar (^1HN-^15N,
^1H^α-^13C^α, ^1HN-^13CO) and chemical shift anisotropy
(^13CO) interactions of the invisible, excited state that are
probed (arrows), as well as the chemical shifts (^1HN, ^15N,
^13C^α and ^13CO) that are measured (balls) by the relaxation
dispersion NMR experiments that were recorded for the present
work. (B–F) Typical relaxation dispersion profiles recorded on
samples of ^15N,^2H- (B, C, and F), ^13C^α- (D), or
^15N,^13CO,^2H- (E) labeled Abp1p SH3 domain and
substoichiometric amounts of Ark1p peptide (≈5–10% by mole
fraction, depending on the sample) at static magnetic field
strengths of 500 and 800 MHz (red and blue points,
respectively), 25°C, along with global fits of the data to a
model of two-site chemical exchange (solid lines).
|
 |
Figure 3.
Solution structure of the invisible, Ark1p-peptide bound
conformation of the Abp1p SH3 domain. (A) Ensemble of 10
starting structures generated from high temperature molecular
dynamics of the apo-Abp1p SH3 domain x-ray structure (22), as
described in the text. Regions in gray are fixed to the x-ray
structure, because Δϖ[RMS] ≈ 0. The pair-wise rmsd values of
the backbone C^α, CO and N atoms of regions 1 (red), 2 (blue)
and 3 (green) are 5.8 ± 1.6, 3.7 ± 1.0, 2.6
± 0.7 Å, respectively (10.4 ± 1.6, 8.6
± 1.2, 3.8 ± 0.6 Å with respect to the
apo-Abp1p1 SH3 domain x-ray coordinates). (B) Ensemble of the 10
lowest energy structures generated using (φ, ψ) restraints
exclusively, as described in the text. Pair-wise rmsd values of
regions 1, 2 and 3 are 3.1 ± 1.4, 3.8 ± 2.4 and
1.2 ± 0.7 Å, respectively. (C) As in B, but
including restraints from residual anisotropic interactions as
measured using a single alignment media (Pf1). The rmsd values
of 0.39 ± 0.12, 0.30 ± 0.11 and 0.20 ± 0.06
Å are calculated for regions 1–3 (0.47 ± 0.10,
0.76 ± 0.14 and 0.53 ± 0.07 Å to the
reference structure of the bound form). Inset, ribbon diagram of
the apo-Abp1p SH3 domain x-ray structure; all conformers in the
figure are in the same orientation. All of the rmsd values
reported are calculated by superimposing the “fixed” regions
(gray in Fig. 2C); the fixed regions are not included in the
computation.
|
 |
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
G.Bouvignies,
P.Vallurupalli,
D.F.Hansen,
B.E.Correia,
O.Lange,
A.Bah,
R.M.Vernon,
F.W.Dahlquist,
D.Baker,
and
L.E.Kay
(2011).
Solution structure of a minor and transiently formed state of a T4 lysozyme mutant.
|
| |
Nature,
477,
111-114.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Bouvignies,
P.Vallurupalli,
M.H.Cordes,
D.F.Hansen,
and
L.E.Kay
(2011).
Measuring 1HN temperature coefficients in invisible protein states by relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
50,
13-18.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.M.Clore
(2011).
Exploring sparsely populated states of macromolecules by diamagnetic and paramagnetic NMR relaxation.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
20,
229-246.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Bieri,
A.H.Kwan,
M.Mobli,
G.F.King,
J.P.Mackay,
and
P.R.Gooley
(2011).
Macromolecular NMR spectroscopy for the non-spectroscopist: beyond macromolecular solution structure determination.
|
| |
FEBS J,
278,
704-715.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.R.Sosnick,
and
D.Barrick
(2011).
The folding of single domain proteins--have we reached a consensus?
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
21,
12-24.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Kodama,
M.L.Reese,
N.Shimba,
K.Ono,
E.Kanamori,
V.Dötsch,
S.Noguchi,
Y.Fukunishi,
E.Suzuki,
I.Shimada,
and
H.Takahashi
(2011).
Rapid identification of protein-protein interfaces for the construction of a complex model based on multiple unassigned signals by using time-sharing NMR measurements.
|
| |
J Struct Biol,
174,
434-442.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Cogliati,
L.Ragona,
M.D'Onofrio,
U.Günther,
S.Whittaker,
C.Ludwig,
S.Tomaselli,
M.Assfalg,
and
H.Molinari
(2010).
Site-specific investigation of the steady-state kinetics and dynamics of the multistep binding of bile acid molecules to a lipid carrier protein.
|
| |
Chemistry,
16,
11300-11310.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.M.Korzhnev,
T.L.Religa,
W.Banachewicz,
A.R.Fersht,
and
L.E.Kay
(2010).
A transient and low-populated protein-folding intermediate at atomic resolution.
|
| |
Science,
329,
1312-1316.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Morcos,
S.Chatterjee,
C.L.McClendon,
P.R.Brenner,
R.López-Rendón,
J.Zintsmaster,
M.Ercsey-Ravasz,
C.R.Sweet,
M.P.Jacobson,
J.W.Peng,
and
J.A.Izaguirre
(2010).
Modeling conformational ensembles of slow functional motions in Pin1-WW.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol,
6,
e1001015.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Robustelli,
K.Kohlhoff,
A.Cavalli,
and
M.Vendruscolo
(2010).
Using NMR chemical shifts as structural restraints in molecular dynamics simulations of proteins.
|
| |
Structure,
18,
923-933.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Auer,
D.F.Hansen,
P.Neudecker,
D.M.Korzhnev,
D.R.Muhandiram,
R.Konrat,
and
L.E.Kay
(2010).
Measurement of signs of chemical shift differences between ground and excited protein states: a comparison between H(S/M)QC and R1rho methods.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
46,
205-216.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Ren,
H.Wang,
and
R.Ghose
(2010).
Dynamics on multiple timescales in the RNA-directed RNA polymerase from the cystovirus phi6.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
38,
5105-5118.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.J.Baldwin,
and
L.E.Kay
(2009).
NMR spectroscopy brings invisible protein states into focus.
|
| |
Nat Chem Biol,
5,
808-814.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.K.Mittermaier,
and
L.E.Kay
(2009).
Observing biological dynamics at atomic resolution using NMR.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
34,
601-611.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Russel,
K.Lasker,
J.Phillips,
D.Schneidman-Duhovny,
J.A.Velázquez-Muriel,
and
A.Sali
(2009).
The structural dynamics of macromolecular processes.
|
| |
Curr Opin Cell Biol,
21,
97.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.M.Clore,
and
J.Iwahara
(2009).
Theory, practice, and applications of paramagnetic relaxation enhancement for the characterization of transient low-population states of biological macromolecules and their complexes.
|
| |
Chem Rev,
109,
4108-4139.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.K.Picton,
S.Casares,
A.C.Monahan,
A.Majumdar,
and
R.B.Hill
(2009).
Evidence for conformational heterogeneity of fission protein Fis1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
48,
6598-6609.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Lundström,
H.Lin,
and
L.E.Kay
(2009).
Measuring 13Cbeta chemical shifts of invisible excited states in proteins by relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
44,
139-155.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Neudecker,
P.Lundström,
and
L.E.Kay
(2009).
Relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy as a tool for detailed studies of protein folding.
|
| |
Biophys J,
96,
2045-2054.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Vallurupalli,
D.F.Hansen,
P.Lundström,
and
L.E.Kay
(2009).
CPMG relaxation dispersion NMR experiments measuring glycine 1H alpha and 13C alpha chemical shifts in the 'invisible' excited states of proteins.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
45,
45-55.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.R.Van Doren
(2009).
Nuclear magnetic resonance captures the elusive.
|
| |
F1000 Biol Rep,
1,
0.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Ulzega,
M.Verde,
F.Ferrage,
and
G.Bodenhausen
(2009).
Heteronuclear double resonance in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Relaxation of multiple-quantum coherences.
|
| |
J Chem Phys,
131,
224503.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Chevelkov,
U.Fink,
and
B.Reif
(2009).
Quantitative analysis of backbone motion in proteins using MAS solid-state NMR spectroscopy.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
45,
197-206.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |