 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription/DNA
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2ht0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Cellular component
|
cytoplasm
|
2 terms
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
conjugation
|
5 terms
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
DNA binding
|
1 term
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
365:1005-1016
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structure-based Analysis of HU-DNA Binding.
|
|
K.K.Swinger,
P.A.Rice.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
HU and IHF are prokaryotic proteins that induce very large bends in DNA. They
are present in high concentrations in the bacterial nucleoid and aid in
chromosomal compaction. They also function as regulatory cofactors in many
processes, such as site-specific recombination and the initiation of replication
and transcription. HU and IHF have become paradigms for understanding DNA
bending and indirect readout of sequence. While IHF shows significant sequence
specificity, HU binds preferentially to certain damaged or distorted DNAs.
However, none of the structurally diverse HU substrates previously studied in
vitro is identical with the distorted substrates in the recently published
Anabaena HU(AHU)-DNA cocrystal structures. Here, we report binding affinities
for AHU and the DNA in the cocrystal structures. The binding free energies for
formation of these AHU-DNA complexes range from approximately 10-14.5 kcal/mol,
representing K(d) values in the nanomolar to low picomolar range, and a maximum
stabilization of at least approximately 6.3 kcal/mol relative to complexes with
undistorted, non-specific DNA. We investigated IHF binding and found that
appropriate structural distortions can greatly enhance its affinity. On the
basis of the coupling of structural and relevant binding data, we estimate the
amount of conformational strain in an IHF-mediated DNA kink that is relieved by
a nick (at least 0.76 kcal/mol) and pinpoint the location of the strain. We show
that AHU has a sequence preference for an A+T-rich region in the center of its
DNA-binding site, correlating with an unusually narrow minor groove. This is
similar to sequence preferences shown by the eukaryotic nucleosome.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. IHF–DNA and AHU–DNA cocrystal structures.
(a) Stereoview of a superposition of the IHF–DNA and AHU–DNA
complexes. IHF protein is shown in grey and white, IHF DNA is
pink (1IHF). AHU is gold and the bound DNA is green (1P71).
Proline residues at the tips of the arm-like β-ribbon extension
are in yellow. (b) The AHU–DNA complex (1P71) is color-coded
as in Table 1. The protein subunits are gold and orange, and the
intercalating proline residues are in yellow. Canonical DNA is
blue, unpaired bases are green (stacked) or grey (flipped), and
mismatches are pink (from Figure 3 of Swinger et al.).^10
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Comparisons of IHF-kinked DNA and AHU-kinked DNA.
(a) A stereoview of a superposition of kinked DNA from the
previously published IHF–DNA structure in pink (1IHF), and the
sharper of the kinks in the AHU–DNA structure in green (1P78).
The tips of the β-ribbon protein arms are shown in white (IHF)
and gold (AHU), with the intercalating proline residues in
yellow. Bases at the kink in these two structures superimpose
remarkably well considering the differences in sequences and the
presence of an extra T in the AHU structure (marked by an
asterisk). The sequences for the portions of the structures
shown are in green for AHU and in pink for IHF. The asterisk
marks the intercalated T. (b) A stereoview of a superposition of
kinked DNA from a nicked IHF–DNA structure deposited recently
with the RCSB Protein Data Bank in pink (2HT0) and the AHU–DNA
structure in green. The nick in the IHF DNA backbone in this
structure is directly at the site of kinking. Proteins are
color-coded as in (a). The superposition of paired bases in
these two structures is even closer than that observed in (a).
The arrow by the IHF sequence in pink marks the location of the
nick. This view illustrates that a nick and an extra T similarly
relieve strain in the kinked DNA backbone.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2007,
365,
1005-1016)
copyright 2007.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
B.Xiao,
R.C.Johnson,
and
J.F.Marko
(2010).
Modulation of HU-DNA interactions by salt concentration and applied force.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res, 38,
6176-6185.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.F.Davenport,
and
B.Tümmler
(2010).
Abundant oligonucleotides common to most bacteria.
|
| |
PLoS One, 5,
e9841.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Kumar,
A.A.Sardesai,
D.Basu,
K.Muniyappa,
and
S.E.Hasnain
(2010).
DNA clasping by mycobacterial HU: the C-terminal region of HupB mediates increased specificity of DNA binding.
|
| |
PLoS One, 5,
0.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Oberto,
S.Nabti,
V.Jooste,
H.Mignot,
and
J.Rouviere-Yaniv
(2009).
The HU regulon is composed of genes responding to anaerobiosis, acid stress, high osmolarity and SOS induction.
|
| |
PLoS ONE, 4,
e4367.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.N.Rao,
M.R.Gómez-García,
and
A.Kornberg
(2009).
Inorganic polyphosphate: essential for growth and survival.
|
| |
Annu Rev Biochem, 78,
605-647.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.L.Whiteson,
and
P.A.Rice
(2008).
Binding and catalytic contributions to site recognition by flp recombinase.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 283,
11414-11423.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Czapla,
D.Swigon,
and
W.K.Olson
(2008).
Effects of the nucleoid protein HU on the structure, flexibility, and ring-closure properties of DNA deduced from Monte Carlo simulations.
|
| |
J Mol Biol, 382,
353-370.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
|
| |