 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Cellular component
|
nucleus
|
1 term
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
369:334-342
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Molecular Implications of Evolutionary Differences in CHD Double Chromodomains.
|
|
J.F.Flanagan,
B.J.Blus,
D.Kim,
K.L.Clines,
F.Rastinejad,
S.Khorasanizadeh.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Double chromodomains occur in CHD proteins, which are ATP-dependent chromatin
remodeling factors implicated in RNA polymerase II transcription regulation.
Biochemical studies suggest important differences in the histone H3 tail binding
of different CHD chromodomains. In human and Drosophila, CHD1 double
chromodomains bind lysine 4-methylated histone H3 tail, which is a hallmark of
transcriptionally active chromatin in all eukaryotes. Here, we present the
crystal structure of the yeast CHD1 double chromodomains, and pinpoint their
differences with that of the human CHD1 double chromodomains. The most conserved
residues in these double chromodomains are the two chromoboxes that orient
adjacently. Only a subset of CHD chromoboxes can form an aromatic cage for
methyllysine binding, and methyllysine binding requires correctly oriented
inserts. These factors preclude yeast CHD1 double chromodomains from interacting
with the histone H3 tail. Despite great sequence similarity between the human
CHD1 and CHD2 chromodomains, variation within an insert likely prevents CHD2
double chromodomains from binding lysine 4-methylated histone H3 tail as
efficiently as in CHD1. By using the available structural and biochemical data
we highlight the evolutionary specialization of CHD double chromodomains, and
provide insights about their targeting capacities.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. A phylogenetic tree constructed using the double
chromodomain regions of non-redundant CHD sequences. Four major
divisions are highlighted to suggest unique double chromodomain
branches. Not highlighted are the four CHD proteins that exhibit
significant divergence in their sequences.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2007,
369,
334-342)
copyright 2007.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
G.Hauk,
J.N.McKnight,
I.M.Nodelman,
and
G.D.Bowman
(2010).
The chromodomains of the Chd1 chromatin remodeler regulate DNA access to the ATPase motor.
|
| |
Mol Cell, 39,
711-723.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Fertey,
I.Ammermann,
M.Winkler,
R.Stöger,
T.Iftner,
and
F.Stubenrauch
(2010).
Interaction of the papillomavirus E8--E2C protein with the cellular CHD6 protein contributes to transcriptional repression.
|
| |
J Virol, 84,
9505-9515.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.L.Yap,
and
M.M.Zhou
(2010).
Keeping it in the family: diverse histone recognition by conserved structural folds.
|
| |
Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol, 45,
488-505.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Batsukh,
L.Pieper,
A.M.Koszucka,
N.von Velsen,
S.Hoyer-Fender,
M.Elbracht,
J.E.Bergman,
L.H.Hoefsloot,
and
S.Pauli
(2010).
CHD8 interacts with CHD7, a protein which is mutated in CHARGE syndrome.
|
| |
Hum Mol Genet, 19,
2858-2866.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.K.Quan,
and
G.A.Hartzog
(2010).
Histone H3K4 and K36 methylation, Chd1 and Rpd3S oppose the functions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Spt4-Spt5 in transcription.
|
| |
Genetics, 184,
321-334.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Kim,
and
S.Buratowski
(2009).
Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 recruits the Set3 histone deacetylase complex to 5' transcribed regions.
|
| |
Cell, 137,
259-272.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Biswas,
S.Takahata,
H.Xin,
R.Dutta-Biswas,
Y.Yu,
T.Formosa,
and
D.J.Stillman
(2008).
A role for Chd1 and Set2 in negatively regulating DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
|
| |
Genetics, 178,
649-659.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.H.Sural,
S.Peng,
B.Li,
J.L.Workman,
P.J.Park,
and
M.I.Kuroda
(2008).
The MSL3 chromodomain directs a key targeting step for dosage compensation of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol, 15,
1318-1325.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Fischle,
H.Franz,
S.A.Jacobs,
C.D.Allis,
and
S.Khorasanizadeh
(2008).
Specificity of the chromodomain Y chromosome family of chromodomains for lysine-methylated ARK(S/T) motifs.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 283,
19626-19635.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Biswas,
R.Dutta-Biswas,
and
D.J.Stillman
(2007).
Chd1 and yFACT act in opposition in regulating transcription.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol, 27,
6279-6287.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Lall
(2007).
Primers on chromatin.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol, 14,
1110-1115.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
|