 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription regulator
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2gzu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
DNA binding
|
2 terms
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biomol Nmr
40:1
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
High-resolution structure determination of the CylR2 homodimer using paramagnetic relaxation enhancement and structure-based prediction of molecular alignment.
|
|
S.Rumpel,
S.Becker,
M.Zweckstetter.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Structure determination of homooligomeric proteins by NMR spectroscopy is
difficult due to the lack of chemical shift perturbation data, which is very
effective in restricting the binding interface in heterooligomeric systems, and
the difficulty of obtaining a sufficient number of intermonomer distance
restraints. Here we solved the high-resolution solution structure of the 15.4
kDa homodimer CylR2, the regulator of cytolysin production from Enterococcus
faecalis, which deviates by 1.1 A from the previously determined X-ray
structure. We studied the influence of different experimental information such
as long-range distances derived from paramagnetic relaxation enhancement,
residual dipolar couplings, symmetry restraints and intermonomer Nuclear
Overhauser Effect restraints on the accuracy of the derived structure. In
addition, we show that it is useful to combine experimental information with
methods of ab initio docking when the available experimental data are not
sufficient to obtain convergence to the correct homodimeric structure. In
particular, intermonomer distances may not be required when residual dipolar
couplings are compared to values predicted on the basis of the charge
distribution and the shape of ab initio docking solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
T.Gruene,
M.K.Cho,
I.Karyagina,
H.Y.Kim,
C.Grosse,
K.Giller,
M.Zweckstetter,
and
S.Becker
(2011).
Integrated analysis of the conformation of a protein-linked spin label by crystallography, EPR and NMR spectroscopy.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR, 49,
111-119.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.J.Yeo,
H.Y.Kim,
Y.P.Kim,
E.Hwang,
M.H.Kim,
C.Cheong,
S.Choe,
and
Y.H.Jeon
(2010).
Rapid exploration of the folding topology of helical membrane proteins using paramagnetic perturbation.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 19,
2409-2417.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.R.Donald,
and
J.Martin
(2009).
Automated NMR Assignment and Protein Structure Determination using Sparse Dipolar Coupling Constraints.
|
| |
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc, 55,
101-127.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Saio,
K.Ogura,
M.Yokochi,
Y.Kobashigawa,
and
F.Inagaki
(2009).
Two-point anchoring of a lanthanide-binding peptide to a target protein enhances the paramagnetic anisotropic effect.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR, 44,
157-166.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Schwede,
A.Sali,
B.Honig,
M.Levitt,
H.M.Berman,
D.Jones,
S.E.Brenner,
S.K.Burley,
R.Das,
N.V.Dokholyan,
R.L.Dunbrack,
K.Fidelis,
A.Fiser,
A.Godzik,
Y.J.Huang,
C.Humblet,
M.P.Jacobson,
A.Joachimiak,
S.R.Krystek,
T.Kortemme,
A.Kryshtafovych,
G.T.Montelione,
J.Moult,
D.Murray,
R.Sanchez,
T.R.Sosnick,
D.M.Standley,
T.Stouch,
S.Vajda,
M.Vasquez,
J.D.Westbrook,
and
I.A.Wilson
(2009).
Outcome of a workshop on applications of protein models in biomedical research.
|
| |
Structure, 17,
151-159.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Rumpel,
R.Lakshmi,
S.Becker,
and
M.Zweckstetter
(2008).
Assignment-free solution NMR method reveals CesT as an unswapped homodimer.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 17,
2015-2019.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Wang,
S.Bansal,
M.Jiang,
and
J.H.Prestegard
(2008).
RDC-assisted modeling of symmetric protein homo-oligomers.
|
| |
Protein Sci, 17,
899-907.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
|