|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
methylation
|
1 term
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
protein binding
|
2 terms
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
359:86-96
(2006)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural insights of the specificity and catalysis of a viral histone H3 lysine 27 methyltransferase.
|
|
C.Qian,
X.Wang,
K.Manzur,
Sachchidanand,
A.Farooq,
L.Zeng,
R.Wang,
M.M.Zhou.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
SET domain lysine methyltransferases are known to catalyze site and
state-specific methylation of lysine residues in histones that is fundamental in
epigenetic regulation of gene activation and silencing in eukaryotic organisms.
Here we report the three-dimensional solution structure of the SET domain
histone lysine methyltransferase (vSET) from Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus
1 bound to cofactor S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine and a histone H3 peptide
containing mono-methylated lysine 27. The dimeric structure, mimicking an
enzyme/cofactor/substrate complex, yields the structural basis of the substrate
specificity and methylation multiplicity of the enzyme. Our results from
mutagenesis and enzyme kinetics analyses argue that a general base mechanism is
less likely for lysine methylation by SET domains; and that the only invariant
active site residue tyrosine 105 in vSET facilitates methyl transfer from
cofactor to the substrate lysine by aligning intermolecular interactions in the
lysine access channel of the enzyme.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. The three-dimensional structure of the tertiary
complex of vSET with cofactor SAH and H3-K27me peptide. (a)
Stereoview of superimposition of backbone atoms (N, C^α and
C′) of 20 lowest energy NMR structures of the
vSET/SAH/H3-K27me. For clarity, only residues A25–A31 of the
H3 peptide are depicted in the final structures. (b) Ribbon
diagrams of the vSET/SAH/H3-K27me tertiary complex structure,
shown in front view as in (a) (left panel) and top view with
90° rotation (right panel). vSET, SAH and H3-K27me peptide
are color-coded in blue, green and pink, respectively. The
peptide residues shown in this structure are T22-G33. (c)
Surface electrostatic potential representation of the vSET
protein in tertiary complex with SAH and H3-K27me peptide,
depicted in a front view as in (b). (d) Comparison of the apo
and ternary complex structures of vSET. The structures were
superimposed with the secondary structural elements only. (e)
The backbone {^1H}–^15N heteronuclear NOEs of vSET in the free
form (lower panel) and in the tertiary complex with SAH and
H3-K27me peptide (top panel). Error bars represent the standard
deviation of NOE values measured in three data sets. (f) The
regions of vSET that exhibited increased backbone dynamics upon
ternary complex formation, as indicated by reduced {^1H}–^15N
heteronuclear NOEs in (e), are highlighted in red in the Ribbon
diagram of the vSET structure. Figure 2. The
three-dimensional structure of the tertiary complex of vSET with
cofactor SAH and H3-K27me peptide. (a) Stereoview of
superimposition of backbone atoms (N, C^α and C′) of 20
lowest energy NMR structures of the vSET/SAH/H3-K27me. For
clarity, only residues A25–A31 of the H3 peptide are depicted
in the final structures. (b) Ribbon diagrams of the
vSET/SAH/H3-K27me tertiary complex structure, shown in front
view as in (a) (left panel) and top view with 90° rotation
(right panel). vSET, SAH and H3-K27me peptide are color-coded in
blue, green and pink, respectively. The peptide residues shown
in this structure are T22-G33. (c) Surface electrostatic
potential representation of the vSET protein in tertiary complex
with SAH and H3-K27me peptide, depicted in a front view as in
(b). (d) Comparison of the apo and ternary complex structures of
vSET. The structures were superimposed with the secondary
structural elements only. (e) The backbone {^1H}–^15N
heteronuclear NOEs of vSET in the free form (lower panel) and in
the tertiary complex with SAH and H3-K27me peptide (top panel).
Error bars represent the standard deviation of NOE values
measured in three data sets. (f) The regions of vSET that
exhibited increased backbone dynamics upon ternary complex
formation, as indicated by reduced {^1H}–^15N heteronuclear
NOEs in (e), are highlighted in red in the Ribbon diagram of the
vSET structure.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. The molecular determinants of H3-K27 methylation by
vSET. The geometry and molecular environment of the lysine
access channel in SET domains is shown for (a), vSET in the apo
form; (b) vSET in the ternary complex; (c) DIM-5; (d) Set7/9;
and (e) SET8. The SET domain protein residues are color-coded in
gray, blue and red for carbon, nitrogen and oxygen,
respectively, whereas the residues of the histone peptide
substrates including substrate lysine are color-coded in green
for carbon and nitrogen. Figure 4. The molecular determinants
of H3-K27 methylation by vSET. The geometry and molecular
environment of the lysine access channel in SET domains is shown
for (a), vSET in the apo form; (b) vSET in the ternary complex;
(c) DIM-5; (d) Set7/9; and (e) SET8. The SET domain protein
residues are color-coded in gray, blue and red for carbon,
nitrogen and oxygen, respectively, whereas the residues of the
histone peptide substrates including substrate lysine are
color-coded in green for carbon and nitrogen.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2006,
359,
86-96)
copyright 2006.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
S.Krishnan,
S.Horowitz,
and
R.C.Trievel
(2011).
Structure and function of histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferases and demethylases.
|
| |
Chembiochem, 12,
254-263.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Cao,
Y.Chen,
T.Cierpicki,
Y.Liu,
V.Basrur,
M.Lei,
and
Y.Dou
(2010).
An Ash2L/RbBP5 heterodimer stimulates the MLL1 methyltransferase activity through coordinated substrate interactions with the MLL1 SET domain.
|
| |
PLoS One, 5,
e14102.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Wei,
and
M.M.Zhou
(2010).
Dimerization of a viral SET protein endows its function.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107,
18433-18438.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Wei,
and
M.M.Zhou
(2010).
Viral-encoded enzymes that target host chromatin functions.
|
| |
Biochim Biophys Acta, 1799,
296-301.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Wu,
J.Min,
V.V.Lunin,
T.Antoshenko,
L.Dombrovski,
H.Zeng,
A.Allali-Hassani,
V.Campagna-Slater,
M.Vedadi,
C.H.Arrowsmith,
A.N.Plotnikov,
and
M.Schapira
(2010).
Structural biology of human H3K9 methyltransferases.
|
| |
PLoS One, 5,
e8570.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.M.Zhou,
E.Lee,
F.Kanapathy-Sinnaiaha,
Y.Park,
J.A.Kornblatt,
Y.Lim,
and
R.K.Ibrahim
(2010).
Structure-function relationships of wheat flavone O-methyltransferase: Homology modeling and site-directed mutagenesis.
|
| |
BMC Plant Biol, 10,
156.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.S.Cosgrove,
and
A.Patel
(2010).
Mixed lineage leukemia: a structure-function perspective of the MLL1 protein.
|
| |
FEBS J, 277,
1832-1842.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Patel,
V.Dharmarajan,
V.E.Vought,
and
M.S.Cosgrove
(2009).
On the mechanism of multiple lysine methylation by the human mixed lineage leukemia protein-1 (MLL1) core complex.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 284,
24242-24256.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Raunser,
R.Magnani,
Z.Huang,
R.L.Houtz,
R.C.Trievel,
P.A.Penczek,
and
T.Walz
(2009).
Rubisco in complex with Rubisco large subunit methyltransferase.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106,
3160-3165.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.F.Couture,
L.M.Dirk,
J.S.Brunzelle,
R.L.Houtz,
and
R.C.Trievel
(2008).
Structural origins for the product specificity of SET domain protein methyltransferases.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105,
20659-20664.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Hu,
S.Wang,
and
Y.Zhang
(2008).
How do SET-domain protein lysine methyltransferases achieve the methylation state specificity? Revisited by Ab initio QM/MM molecular dynamics simulations.
|
| |
J Am Chem Soc, 130,
3806-3813.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Joshi,
E.A.Carrington,
L.Wang,
C.S.Ketel,
E.L.Miller,
R.S.Jones,
and
J.A.Simon
(2008).
Dominant Alleles Identify SET Domain Residues Required for Histone Methyltransferase of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2.
|
| |
J Biol Chem, 283,
27757-27766.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Mujtaba,
K.L.Manzur,
J.R.Gurnon,
M.Kang,
J.L.Van Etten,
and
M.M.Zhou
(2008).
Epigenetic transcriptional repression of cellular genes by a viral SET protein.
|
| |
Nat Cell Biol, 10,
1114-1122.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Zhang,
and
T.C.Bruice
(2008).
Enzymatic mechanism and product specificity of SET-domain protein lysine methyltransferases.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105,
5728-5732.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Wang,
P.Hu,
and
Y.Zhang
(2007).
Ab initio quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical molecular dynamics simulation of enzyme catalysis: the case of histone lysine methyltransferase SET7/9.
|
| |
J Phys Chem B, 111,
3758-3764.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.F.Couture,
and
R.C.Trievel
(2006).
Histone-modifying enzymes: encrypting an enigmatic epigenetic code.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol, 16,
753-760.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
|