 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RNA binding protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2dt6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
RNA binding protein
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Solution structure of the first surp domain of human splicing factor sf3a120
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Splicing factor 3 subunit 1. Chain: a. Fragment: surp domain. Synonym: spliceosome-associated protein 114, sap 114, sf3a120. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: sf3a120, sf3a1. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562.
|
|
NMR struc:
|
 |
20 models
|
 |
|
Authors:
|
 |
K.Kuwasako,F.He,M.Inoue,A.Tanaka,S.Sugano,P.Guentert,Y.Muto, S.Yokoyama,Riken Structural Genomics/proteomics Initiative (Rsgi)
|
Key ref:
|
 |
K.Kuwasako
et al.
(2006).
Solution structures of the SURP domains and the subunit-assembly mechanism within the splicing factor SF3a complex in 17S U2 snRNP.
Structure,
14,
1677-1689.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
11-Jul-06
|
Release date:
|
26-Dec-06
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q15459
(SF3A1_HUMAN) -
Splicing factor 3A subunit 1
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
793 a.a.
64 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
*
PDB and UniProt seqs differ
at 1 residue position (black
cross)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Biological process
|
RNA processing
|
1 term
|
 |
|
Biochemical function
|
RNA binding
|
1 term
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Structure
14:1677-1689
(2006)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Solution structures of the SURP domains and the subunit-assembly mechanism within the splicing factor SF3a complex in 17S U2 snRNP.
|
|
K.Kuwasako,
F.He,
M.Inoue,
A.Tanaka,
S.Sugano,
P.Güntert,
Y.Muto,
S.Yokoyama.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The SF3a complex, consisting of SF3a60, SF3a66, and SF3a120, in 17S U2 snRNP is
crucial to spliceosomal assembly. SF3a120 contains two tandem SURP domains
(SURP1 and SURP2), and SURP2 is responsible for binding to SF3a60. We found that
the SURP2 fragment forms a stable complex with an SF3a60 fragment (residues
71-107) and solved its structure by NMR spectroscopy. SURP2 exhibits a fold of
the alpha1-alpha2-3(10)-alpha3 topology, and the SF3a60 fragment forms an
amphipathic alpha helix intimately contacting alpha1 of SURP2. We also solved
the SURP1 structure, which has the same fold as SURP2. The protein-binding
interface of SURP2 is quite similar to the corresponding surface of SURP1,
except for two amino acid residues. One of them, Leu169, is characteristic of
SF3a120 SURP2 among SURP domains. Mutagenesis showed that this single Leu
residue is the critical determinant for complex formation, which reveals the
protein recognition mechanism in the subunit assembly.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Sequence Alignment of SURP1 and SURP2 in SF3a120
and SURP1 in Human SWAP Yellow backgrounds and asterisks
indicate highly conserved residues among the SURP domains, and a
black background with yellow letters indicates the conserved
phenylalanine among all of the SURP domains, as shown in Figure
8B. The critical position for complex formation is indicated by
a red arrowhead, and the colors reflect the amino acid type:
red, blue, and green letters represent hydrophobic
(protein-binding type), charged, and neutral (S, T, and Q) amino
acids, respectively. The hydrophobic-core-forming residues are
indicated by filled circles, and the residues that interact with
the core residues are indicated by open circles. Red stars and
red open stars indicate the hydrophobic- and
hydrophilic-complex-forming residues in SURP2 of SF3a120,
respectively.
|
 |
Figure 8.
Figure 8. Sequence Profiling Analyses of SURP Domains
(A) SURP-containing proteins in eukaryotes. (B) HMM-logo
format representation of the amino acid conservation in the SURP
domains. The sequence information of all of the SURP domains
shown in (A) was analyzed by the HMMER program (Schuster-Bockler
et al., 2004). Asterisks indicate highly conserved residues
among the SURP domains. The red arrowhead indicates the critical
position for the complex formation. (C) Phylogenic tree of
the SURP domains. All of the SURP domains shown in (A) are
included. The colors of the letters reflect the amino acid type
of the critical residues for the complex formation (Leu169 in
the SURP2 domain on human SF3a120); red, blue, and green letters
represent hydrophobic (protein-binding type), charged, and
neutral (S, T, and Q) amino acids in the positions, respectively.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Structure
(2006,
14,
1677-1689)
copyright 2006.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
K.Kuwasako,
N.Dohmae,
M.Inoue,
M.Shirouzu,
S.Taguchi,
P.Güntert,
B.Séraphin,
Y.Muto,
and
S.Yokoyama
(2008).
Complex assembly mechanism and an RNA-binding mode of the human p14-SF3b155 spliceosomal protein complex identified by NMR solution structure and functional analyses.
|
| |
Proteins, 71,
1617-1636.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.S.Jurica
(2008).
Detailed close-ups and the big picture of spliceosomes.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol, 18,
315-320.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Bonet,
X.Ramirez-Espain,
and
M.J.Macias
(2008).
Solution structure of the yeast URN1 splicing factor FF domain: comparative analysis of charge distributions in FF domain structures-FFs and SURPs, two domains with a similar fold.
|
| |
Proteins, 73,
1001-1009.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
|