spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 2as6

Go to PDB code: 
protein ligands links
Oxidoreductase PDB id
2as6

 

 

 

 

Loading ...

 
JSmol PyMol  
Contents
Protein chain
291 a.a. *
Ligands
HEM
1CB
Waters ×364
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
2as6
Name: Oxidoreductase
Title: CytochromE C peroxidase in complex with cyclopentylamine
Structure: CytochromE C peroxidase, mitochondrial. Chain: a. Fragment: cytochromE C peroxidase. Synonym: ccp. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes
Source: Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Baker's yeast. Organism_taxid: 4932. Gene: ccp1, ccp, cpo. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21(de3). Expression_system_taxid: 469008.
Resolution:
1.45Å     R-factor:   0.142     R-free:   0.183
Authors: R.Brenk,S.W.Vetter,S.E.Boyce,D.B.Goodin,B.K.Shoichet
Key ref:
R.Brenk et al. (2006). Probing molecular docking in a charged model binding site. J Mol Biol, 357, 1449-1470. PubMed id: 16490206 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.01.034
Date:
22-Aug-05     Release date:   11-Apr-06    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P00431  (CCPR_YEAST) -  Cytochrome c peroxidase, mitochondrial from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c)
Seq:
Struc:
361 a.a.
291 a.a.*
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain
* PDB and UniProt seqs differ at 3 residue positions (black crosses)

 Enzyme reactions 
   Enzyme class: E.C.1.11.1.5  - cytochrome-c peroxidase.
[IntEnz]   [ExPASy]   [KEGG]   [BRENDA]
      Reaction: 2 Fe(II)-[cytochrome c] + H2O2 + 2 H+ = 2 Fe(III)-[cytochrome c] + 2 H2O
2 × Fe(II)-[cytochrome c]
+ H2O2
+ 2 × H(+)
= 2 × Fe(III)-[cytochrome c]
+ 2 × H2O
      Cofactor: Heme
Heme
Bound ligand (Het Group name = HEM) matches with 95.45% similarity
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the KEGG ftp site

 

 
    Added reference    
 
 
DOI no: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.01.034 J Mol Biol 357:1449-1470 (2006)
PubMed id: 16490206  
 
 
Probing molecular docking in a charged model binding site.
R.Brenk, S.W.Vetter, S.E.Boyce, D.B.Goodin, B.K.Shoichet.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
A model binding site was used to investigate charge-charge interactions in molecular docking. This simple site, a small (180A(3)) engineered cavity in cyctochrome c peroxidase (CCP), is negatively charged and completely buried from solvent, allowing us to explore the balance between electrostatic energy and ligand desolvation energy in a system where many of the common approximations in docking do not apply. A database with about 5300 molecules was docked into this cavity. Retrospective testing with known ligands and decoys showed that overall the balance between electrostatic interaction and desolvation energy was captured. More interesting were prospective docking scre"ens that looked for novel ligands, especially those that might reveal problems with the docking and energy methods. Based on screens of the 5300 compound database, both high-scoring and low-scoring molecules were acquired and tested for binding. Out of 16 new, high-scoring compounds tested, 15 were observed to bind. All of these were small heterocyclic cations. Binding constants were measured for a few of these, they ranged between 20microM and 60microM. Crystal structures were determined for ten of these ligands in complex with the protein. The observed ligand geometry corresponded closely to that predicted by docking. Several low-scoring alkyl amino cations were also tested and found to bind. The low docking score of these molecules owed to the relatively high charge density of the charged amino group and the corresponding high desolvation penalty. When the complex structures of those ligands were determined, a bound water molecule was observed interacting with the amino group and a backbone carbonyl group of the cavity. This water molecule mitigates the desolvation penalty and improves the interaction energy relative to that of the "naked" site used in the docking screen. Finally, six low-scoring neutral molecules were also tested, with a view to looking for false negative predictions. Whereas most of these did not bind, two did (phenol and 3-fluorocatechol). Crystal structures for these two ligands in complex with the cavity site suggest reasons for their binding. That these neutral molecules do, in fact bind, contradicts previous results in this site and, along with the alkyl amines, provides instructive false negatives that help identify weaknesses in our scoring functions. Several improvements of these are considered.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 1.
Figure 1. The cavity in CCP W191G. A transparent surface is displayed showing four ordered water molecules (red) and one potassium ion (green) in the cavity of the apo-structure. Water molecule 308 is conserved in all structures. (This Figure was made using PyMOL (www.pymol.org, as were Figure 4 and Figure 5).)
Figure 7.
Figure 7. Ranks of the CCP W191G cavity ligands (test set ligands and the new ligands in Table 2) scored using Gaussian charges and desolvation energies plotted against the ranks obtained using AMSOL charges and desolvation energies.
 
  The above figures are reprinted by permission from Elsevier: J Mol Biol (2006, 357, 1449-1470) copyright 2006.  
  Figures were selected by an automated process.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
21439477 P.Daldrop, F.E.Reyes, D.A.Robinson, C.M.Hammond, D.M.Lilley, R.T.Batey, and R.Brenk (2011).
Novel ligands for a purine riboswitch discovered by RNA-ligand docking.
  Chem Biol, 18, 324-335.
PDB codes: 2xnw 2xnz 2xo0 2xo1
19527033 C.P.Mpamhanga, D.Spinks, L.B.Tulloch, E.J.Shanks, D.A.Robinson, I.T.Collie, A.H.Fairlamb, P.G.Wyatt, J.A.Frearson, W.N.Hunter, I.H.Gilbert, and R.Brenk (2009).
One scaffold, three binding modes: novel and selective pteridine reductase 1 inhibitors derived from fragment hits discovered by virtual screening.
  J Med Chem, 52, 4454-4465.
PDB codes: 2wd7 2wd8 3gn1 3gn2
18831031 D.J.Huggins, M.D.Altman, and B.Tidor (2009).
Evaluation of an inverse molecular design algorithm in a model binding site.
  Proteins, 75, 168-186.  
19368882 D.L.Mobley, and K.A.Dill (2009).
Binding of small-molecule ligands to proteins: "what you see" is not always "what you get".
  Structure, 17, 489-498.  
18280498 A.P.Graves, D.M.Shivakumar, S.E.Boyce, M.P.Jacobson, D.A.Case, and B.K.Shoichet (2008).
Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing.
  J Mol Biol, 377, 914-934.
PDB codes: 2ray 2raz 2rb0 2rb1 2rb2 2rbn 2rbo 2rbp 2rbq 2rbr 2rbs 2rbt 2rbu 2rbv 2rbw 2rbx 2rby 2rbz 2rc0 2rc1 2rc2
18418822 R.Baron, and J.A.McCammon (2008).
(Thermo)dynamic role of receptor flexibility, entropy, and motional correlation in protein-ligand binding.
  Chemphyschem, 9, 983-988.  
18821750 W.Deng, and C.L.Verlinde (2008).
Evaluation of different virtual screening programs for docking in a charged binding pocket.
  J Chem Inf Model, 48, 2010-2020.  
17334823 K.H.Kim (2007).
Outliers in SAR and QSAR: is unusual binding mode a possible source of outliers?
  J Comput Aided Mol Des, 21, 63-86.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB codes are shown on the right.

 

spacer

spacer