 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(+ 4 more)
238 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(+ 0 more)
236 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Toxin
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of the mosquitocidal toxin from bacillus sphaericus, mutant e195q
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Mosquitocidal toxin. Chain: a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p. Fragment: catalytic domain residues 30-308. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Bacillus sphaericus. Organism_taxid: 1421. Strain: ssii-1. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 511693.
|
|
Biol. unit:
|
 |
Tetramer (from PDB file)
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
3.00Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.227
|
R-free:
|
0.245
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
D.J.Reinert,I.Carpusca,K.Aktories,G.E.Schulz
|
Key ref:
|
 |
D.J.Reinert
et al.
(2006).
Structure of the Mosquitocidal Toxin from Bacillus sphaericus.
J Mol Biol,
357,
1226-1236.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
29-Dec-05
|
Release date:
|
22-Feb-06
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
357:1226-1236
(2006)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structure of the Mosquitocidal Toxin from Bacillus sphaericus.
|
|
D.J.Reinert,
I.Carpusca,
K.Aktories,
G.E.Schulz.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The catalytic domain of a mosquitocidal toxin prolonged by a C-terminal 44
residue linker connecting to four ricin B-like domains was crystallized. Three
crystal structures were established at resolutions between 2.5A and 3.0A using
multi-wavelength and single-wavelength anomalous X-ray diffraction as well as
molecular replacement phasing techniques. The chainfold of the toxin fragment
corresponds to those of ADP-ribosylating enzymes. At pH 4.3 the fragment is
associated in a C(7)-symmetric heptamer in agreement with an aggregate of
similar size observed by size-exclusion chromatography. In two distinct crystal
forms, the heptamers formed nearly spherical, D(7)-symmetric tetradecamers.
Another crystal form obtained at pH 6.3 contained a recurring C(2)-symmetric
tetramer, which, however, was not stable in solution. On the basis of the common
chainfold and NAD(+)-binding site of all ADP-ribosyl transferases, the
NAD(+)-binding site of the toxin was assigned at a high confidence level. In all
three crystal forms the NAD(+) site was occupied by part of the 44 residue
linker, explaining the known inhibitory effect of this polypeptide region. The
structure showed that the cleavage site for toxin activation is in a highly
mobile loop that is exposed in the monomer. Since it contains the inhibitory
linker as a crucial part of the association contact, the observed heptamer is
inactive. Moreover, the heptamer cannot be activated by proteolysis because the
activation loop is at the ring center and not accessible for proteases.
Therefore the heptamer, or possibly the tetradecamer, seems to represent an
inactive storage form of the toxin.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Stereoview of a ribbon representation of
MTX30-308 from crystal form I, including the activation loop
conformation (green) observed in crystal form II. The proper
catalytic core of several bacterial toxins is marked in blue.
The b-strands and a-helices are labeled, the C-terminal linker
is red. The ARTT motif (pink) and the loop at position 150
(yellow) are likely to contact the target molecule. The
positions of the two glutamate residues of the 195E-x-E motif
are shown as balls. The labels N, AL and C mark residues 33, 264
and 298, respectively. The NAD^+ molecule was transferred from
its binding location in cholera toxin26 to MTX30-308. In
MTX30-308 its position is occupied by the inhibitory linker.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Stereoview of the catalytic center of MTX30-308.
(a) Detailed binding structure of the inhibitory linker. The
crucial segment of the linker is 273D-F-D-M-F-A-P-N-G, which
occupies the putative NAD^+ binding site. (b) Putative
NAD^+-binding site as derived from cholera toxin.26 NAD^+
superimposes with the inhibitory linker explaining the
competitive type of inhibition.17 The suggested interactions of
NAD^+ with the protein (red hydrogen bonds) correspond to the
common features of the ADP-ribosyl transferase family.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2006,
357,
1226-1236)
copyright 2006.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
B.Maurer,
U.Mathias,
P.Papatheodorou,
S.Shekfeh,
J.Orth,
T.Jank,
C.Schwan,
W.Sippl,
K.Aktories,
and
M.Jung
(2011).
From cosubstrate similarity to inhibitor diversity--inhibitors of ADP-ribosyltransferases from kinase inhibitor screening.
|
| |
Mol Biosyst, 7,
799-808.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Phannachet,
P.Raksat,
T.Limvuttegrijeerat,
and
B.Promdonkoy
(2010).
Production and characterization of N- and C-terminally truncated Mtx2: a mosquitocidal toxin from Bacillus sphaericus.
|
| |
Curr Microbiol, 61,
549-553.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Rungrod,
N.K.Tjahaja,
S.Soonsanga,
M.Audtho,
and
B.Promdonkoy
(2009).
Bacillus sphaericus Mtx1 and Mtx2 toxins co-expressed in Escherichia coli are synergistic against Aedes aegypti larvae.
|
| |
Biotechnol Lett, 31,
551-555.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Baysarowich,
K.Koteva,
D.W.Hughes,
L.Ejim,
E.Griffiths,
K.Zhang,
M.Junop,
and
G.D.Wright
(2008).
Rifamycin antibiotic resistance by ADP-ribosylation: Structure and diversity of Arr.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105,
4886-4891.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Yang,
L.Wang,
A.Gaviria,
Z.Yuan,
and
C.Berry
(2007).
Proteolytic stability of insecticidal toxins expressed in recombinant bacilli.
|
| |
Appl Environ Microbiol, 73,
218-225.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.Carpusca,
T.Jank,
and
K.Aktories
(2006).
Bacillus sphaericus mosquitocidal toxin (MTX) and pierisin: the enigmatic offspring from the family of ADP-ribosyltransferases.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol, 62,
621-630.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
| |